Common Sense

The Old Man On The Mountain

Last Updated:
Sep 25, 2008

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Age: 52
State: OHIO
Country: US


Blog Archive
Older     Newer ]


Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Bett Boop For President (1932)
Category: News and Politics

The vid below speaks for itself:

1:03 PM - 11 Comments - 9 Kudos - Add Comment

Sunday, October 05, 2008

The Shape Of Things To Come
Current mood: worried
Category: News and Politics

Sometimes when we are in the middle of a crisis it is hard to see the forest for the trees. Events that seem small and unimportant are later understood as turning points in history. Yesterday such an event occured, the opening battle of a new war that will decide what America will look like for generations to come.

Yesterday Citigroup filed suit to keep Wells Fargo from acquiring Wachovia Bank. Citigroup claims it has the sole right to purchase Wachovia under a deal worked out by federal regulators several weeks ago. This is an ignored opening skirmish in a coming Battle of the Titans to decide what the US economy and financial institutions will look like for the next hundred years. This new fight is on the same scale as that of FDR's "New Deal" that  created a financial order that worked from 1933 till about 2000.

The credit crunch/financial meltdown is due to our financial system being clogged with unappraisable "derivatives" clogging our credit markets. Let's use the example of Chinese milk tainted with melamine. Probabably 95% of Chines milk products are safe to consume. No one will buy anything though because of understandible fear. The market price for Chines milk is ZERO at the moment, a distortion due to panic caused by not knowing the good from the bad. Well the same holds true for the American credit markets. Most of the assets held by financial institutions are worth substantially more (in the long haul) than the current market price driven by fear of buying someone else's tainted milk. Because (like the melamine) these derivatives cannot be sourced back to the origin, all are suspect.

We have seen one after another of our most vaunted financial institutions tumble, some like Countrywide (bought by Bank America) deservedly so. Others are failing only in part due to bad investments they made. Many are going belly up because of the bad investments others made and the impact that has had on their portfolios. Companies find themselves temporarily overleveraged because the assets they hold are undervalued, just as if they hold untainted milk that cannot be certified as safe.

So the first front has opened up as the remaining Titans fight over the comatose bodies of the fallen. The giants still standing are able to pick up massive new acquisitions for a dime on the dollar with the near certainty that these moribund fellows will come around. The Federal Government ( the machine that controls our tax dollars and thus the biggest player in the game) is subsidizing the efforts of these behemouths to gobble up their less fortunate rivals.

One example of how one giant is able to absorb another: Goldman Sachs is a venerated institution around since 1869. They are publicly traded, but barely so. Almost 80% of the stock is held by partners or managed by them for employees and retirees. Only 20% of the stock is publically held and could be repurchased at a moment's notice. This gives Goldman Sachs phenomenal advantages in the current crisis. Goldman Sachs can take the LOOOOOONG view where others are forced to scramble to shore up the next quarter's statements. (On Sept 24 GS announced a new public stock offer of $5 Billion and another $5 Billion cash infusion from Warren Buffet.)

Goldman Sachs also made phenonmenal money betting on a meltdown. The company made $4 Billion selling derivatives "short" . This was THEIR money. The assets they just managed for others fell as much as 37% due to the meltdown...GS is quick and flush with cash when others are scrambling. This week it was announced that Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase are becoming bank holding companies instead of investment banks. The change in status puts them under stricter federal oversight but gives them direct access to huge pools of money available from the fed.

The buyouts and mergers and acquisitions we have been reading about over the last months are all about making MONEY. It is also about power. Citigroup suing Wells Fargo over Wachovia is the opening skimish over who will emerge as the biggest and most powerful. The battle will intensify and much of it will be hidden from public view, even though our taxdollars will determine to a great degree who will win.

The Second Front is the political front. We just saw a massive bailout package passed. The Secretary of the Treasury (Paulsen is the former CEO of Goldman Sachs) has up to $700 Billion to use purchasing these suspect derivatives. How he chooses to spend the money will affect how thwe financial markets emerge in the coming years. He can gobble up the suspect assets while they are cheap and offer them to the remaining Titans. He can offer more than current market value knowing they will be worth more in the future, thus helping the current owners, or he can pay outlandish prices for the assets, subsidizing the current owners at taxpayer expense. Mr Paulsen has NOT made his strategy known...

Part of this second, political front will be a secret battle to force Paulsen's hand in setting up the guidelines used to purchase assets. The longer capaign will unfold over the next few years. The whole war though will be over this: Will we emerge with several MONSTER financial institutions that can determine our policies and our futures for generations to come, or will we force a divestiture? Should w instituted anti-monopoly policies and end the stranglehold the Titans have now and that will tighten in the future, or will we surrender?

 

4:20 AM - 12 Comments - 12 Kudos - Add Comment

Cases Studies Of Loans Gone Bad
Category: News and Politics

Here are three case studies I am personally familiar with, of sub-prime loans gone bad: Names have been changed to keep me from getting my ass sued...

1) Jerry and Ricki Rosen are my former neighbors and"Christians" who constantly remind you of how devout they are. They actually are always involved with two Churches at a time, going to Sunday Meeting at one church then Wednesday at another. For some reason (that will soon be obvious) they change churches quite often.

Jerry and Ricki are mooches and con artists. They have found a niche wandering from church to church whining about how miserably the "earthly" world has treated them. Good and kind hearted folks were always coming over to their house to cut the grass, put on a new roof, raise a huge barn shed, or bring a check over to help them "get by." The couple even got their house due to their whining. When a member of their then church could not sell his home before moving across the country Jerry and Ricky offered to pay rent and then find a loan to buy it. Of course they got preferential "Christian" rent (The mockery of "Christian" is intended towards the Rosens and not the good churchgoers) and a sale price based on real market value from a church appraiser.

The two never tried to get a loan for several years because they had such LOW rent. When the owner pushed and finally demanded they buy or leave, a person from their newest church offered to help them get a good rate, etc. Jerry and Ricki squealed like pigs over the price, saying it was way too high. (well the property had appreciated while they paid rent.) They cried over the rate and over closing costs. The church helped with the costs and the deluded broker called in some serious chips to get them an affordable rate.

(Did I mention that they had just walked away from a previous loan a few years earlier after getting a home equity loan?)

So the Rosens did okay till all of a sudden they'd run out of churches and goodwill to subsidize their lifestyle. The payments on their $110,000 suburban tri-level at 8.25% became more than they could handle after a school levie doubled their taxes to $2,500 a year. (To pay for a freakin' ten million dollar football stadium-but that's another story.) So the Rosen's did the only thing they knew would work for them: REFINANCE...

Before falling behind a payment or two the Rosen's did the savvy thing. Their home had appreciated to an inflated value of $155,000 according to a friendly broker from yet another church. This broker got them a loan to pay off the first mortgage and another $40,000 cash before the Rosens did what they ALWAYS had planned: ABANDON the home. They left the moment the first monthly payment came due, but they did keep coming back.

Jerry Rosen cheated Social Security Disability by doing home remodeling jobs under the table (usually for fellow church members). Actually he was pretty freakin' good. When he needed a sink he came back to the old house and just ripped out the kitchen sink and countertops. The bathrooms were stripped, light fixtures pulled. He even used a chisel to lift cheap ceramic tiles instead of buying new ones from Loew's. The police were called but could do nothing over the long months. Seems XYZ Mortgage had never put the property in foreclosure because it would make a bad set of books look even worse. Jerry and Ricky were listed as the owner still for another year.

Well, last spring the lender finally got a judgement for foreclosure and a Sheriff's sale was scheduled for May 15. On April 15 the lender filed for bankruptcy protection and shortly thereafter a class-action-suit was filed accusing them of predatory lending. Jerry and Ricki found out about the suit and got an attorney. Seems they are now party to the suit and telling anyone who will listen at their new church just how badly the "earthly" world has treated them.

******************

Thomas Bond is a really good guy. A really, really wonderful fellow. He just isn't very f*ckin' bright. Single and fifty-five, he made above the median income. For six months we rode together eight hours a day on a special project for work. Seems he wanted a house and knew his siblings and cousins were all getting houses. A friend referred him to a friend (we found out later for a finder's fee) who could get him "a good loan" from a reputable company called C***trywide. He got preapproved for much more than he imagined given his fair-to-middlin' credit score.

Two days before signing I was grilling him again to find out if he was getting an ARM. He had no idea. I'd spoken to him for hours over the preceding month about the subject. I should have talked to a sponge. At least it would have absorbed more than Thomas did. I offered him crib note questions to ask the broker and even offered to come with him. He declined.

Guess who signed for an ARM. Guess whose interest rate just reset. Guess whose health just caused him to take time off. Guess who (as always) had frittered his savings away in a goodhearted attempt to help all the mooches who are always putting the touch to him. Guess who does deserve better...

************************************

Jean Claude wass an expatriate from France. No one loved capitalist America more and socialist France less. He fell in love with this country because he could use his considerable charm and skills at bullshitting to sell condos in Miami then get the speculators a loan. Jean Claude had three or four lenders across the nation he prefered to use. Seems no one asked too many questions when borrowers all seemed to have a second job with a brother-in-law making $10 or $20 thousand a year. (Just barely hitting the marks for disposable income and debt ratio.)

Making money hand over fist selling the speculative condos without a license (under a realtor) and mortgages without a broker's license wasn't enough. Jean Claude decided he needed to make the real money by buying three condos in different developments going up in Miami. Using his many connections he could buy from a developer with little or no money down for some of the hottest projects in town, get for preapproved interest only loans, and the knowledge that the condos would be worth far more in the six months it would take to build them. After making money on a deal or two, Jean Claude knew he could juggle three...

Where was Jean Claude when the Miami condo bubble burst? I really don't know. I do know he left Miami for his dearly (and newly) beloved homeland leaving behind three condos, one of which he'd closed on and left empty.

3:31 AM - 12 Comments - 15 Kudos - Add Comment

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Summary of a Timeline In Progress...
Category: News and Politics

I'm working on a timeline to try to give people a touchstone to use in figuring out this mess. It's pretty complicated and I try not to draw conclusions, but conclusions are inescapable. A friend "WTD" said he'd need to read it again. I gave him a summary to keep in mind. I think it applies. 

"Keep in mind these things when you read it again

1) Greed. Corporations find a new vehicle (sub prime loans and the mortgage backed securities that they are converted into) to make lots of cash. Package a turd as a bag of gold, sell it and take a cut, then the next guy sells it and takes a cut to the next guy who...

2) Deregulation. The marketplace is supposed to regulate itself according to the pretend capitalism we were being fed. Instead very well connected people tweek the system for their own benefit. (See number one)

3) Government turning a blind eye. Don't let anyone fool you, both parties were on their knees earning the massive payoffs they were getting. Both parties got to sell the lie to their constituencies on main street. (See 4 below)

4) Let the good times roll! As long as consumers, and real estate agents, and mortgage brokers, and lenders, and investment firms, and developers, and builders, and politicians all were making a killing and the economy LOOKED good no one cared even when they KNEW!

5) Like ANY Ponzi/pyramid scheme, the real estate bubble burst when not enough suckers could be found to keep inflating the market and pour in money to pay the people at the top...The musical chairs STOPPED and lots of people were left holding a bag of shit. (See 1 above)

6) Profit is private, but now that losses are piling up we need to socialize disastrous loss and make the TAXPAYER pay."

Another MySpace friend is angry as hell and really loves Fox news. I've tried to convince him to be less partisan and more realistic in his anger. Below is me quoting Myself again. Sorry folks, I can be somewhat self important!

"Did you see asswipe O'Reilly with his favorite scapegoat Barney Franks? Would O'Reilly or Britt Hume go after Bush in that fashion? Or Shelby of AL who held the same position in the Senate for 6 of 8 years that Franks had in the House? Of course not. NEVER. He's not being paid to do that. The editorial board of FOX wouldn't like it, Ruppert Murdoch wouldn't either.

Fox has an ax to grind even worse than CNN or MSNBC.

Portraying affirmative action as a major cause of this meltdown is disingenuous.

If a finger must be pointed at one single entity I would point it at Countrywide Financial who sold 20% of ALL mortgages in America in 2006 (almost half of all subprime to ALL neighborhoods and to SPECULATORS). Next I would blame morons who bought their tainted "derivatives" and those of the Countrywide copycats and wannabes. Next I would blame the government officials elected by us whose public trust was to keep this fraud and corruption from happening. Then I would blame the deregulators who set up this free-for-all business climate. Then I would blame the assholes who allowed loosey-goosey credit standards for loans under the law (lenders and govt regulators and lawmakers). Then I would blame speculators who used the likes of Countrywide to get caught in a real estate bubble. Then I would blame the consumers who were stupid enough to buy homes they couldn't really afford or who sucked the equity out of their homes... Nowhere though does "affirmative action" play a role of the sort like those I listed played. To blame affirmative action is merely a ruse to let ALL the others off the freakin' hook, except Democrats and minorities."

(Note: in the original e-mail I credited Countrywide with almost all sub prime loans. That was a mistake I made in a hurry, and is corrected above. I also corrected obvious typos.)

I would add one more thing: 7) Businessmen like CERTAINTY and gaining marketshare/ monopolies allow more certainty in influencing a market. We have seen merger and acquisition mania for twenty years, creating fewer and more dangerous entities. This meltdown has accelerated that process...

These are MY conclusions. You may get something different out of my timeline when I am finished. I hope it is honest enough for people to do that...

3:05 PM - 12 Comments - 16 Kudos - Add Comment

Monday, October 06, 2008

A Nonpartisan Timeline Of How We Got In This Mess (unfinished)
Category: News and Politics

Keep in mind this is a work in progress... (still not complete. I guess I'm a little over half done with this ambitious project. Forgive all the typos, changes in tense, and a few nonsensical phrases. I'm trying!)

(if anyone has info to add feel free to message me...)

1929: The US economy begins the freefall known as the "Great Depression" with certain agreed upon causes:

Institutional Financial Speculation: American banks loaned money across the Atlantic to fund the German and Austrian reparations debt demanded under the Treaty of Versailles. The Germans and Austrians gave the money to the British and French who then repaid war loans to the American banks. When the Germans and Austrians default on the loans made by American banks they also quit paying reparations. The British and French suspend payment on their war debt and US banks are hit with a double whammy.

A real estate bubble: "The Roaring Twenties" saw a boom in certain sectors of the US economy. Banks provide mortgages at a greater pace than ever before in our history, leading to a spike in urban housing prices. As the Depression developed and deflation set in more and more of the loans went bad, adding further stress to the banks.

Underconsumption: half of the American people did not benefit from the "Roaring Twenties." Industrial workers and farmers who'd received higher wages and farm prices saw a precipitous decline when WWI ended. Workers faced grim times and farmers faced foreclosure and eviction. The pool of consumers capable of buying the products of a mass production society was kept low by policies favoring and a government completely controlled by business interests.

Overcapitalization/ Overleveraging: The maldistribution of income concentrated greater wealth in fewer hands. The savings rate surged and financiers seeking the highest returns invested the money in riskier and riskier forms of investment (like loans to Europe, real estate, and driving up the stock market to unwarranted levels).

Consumer Financial Speculation: Common citizens who had never participated in the stock market were convinced by bankers to take funds from deposit accounts and invest in stocks and bonds. Often bankers allowed consumers to pay only 10% of the price of the stocks. Regular Joes tossed money into the market expecting a return based on the pyramidal rise in prices rather than on the basis of profitability.

Panic!!! Slowly all the speculation and overleveraging of assets reached the crisis point as all Ponzi schemes do. Farmers defaulting on mortgages due to drought and European bank defaults plus an economic downturn due to a further erosion of wages sparked a panic. Regular Joe was called upon to pay the other 90% on stocks that had gone down in value, wiping out savings. Institution were caught on both sides of the equation. Some could not pay for stocks theyb had received with 10% down. Others were not paid the full 90% they were due. On "Black Tuesday" the market took a huge dive. After a small rise the market slip dramatically.

The result was that CREDIT disappeared. Banks had no money to loan and many were wiped out because they were overleveraged. Customers who had never participated in the speculation saw their savings wiped out in the closures.

The government, locked in the mindset of laissez-faire 19th century capitalism had neither the inclination nor the ability to keep the availability of credit from shrinking by 50%. Unable to borrow businesses laid off millions of workers which caused further problems... The country went into the shitter with up to 40%unemployment.

1929-33: The Hoover administration attempts several market driven reforms that fail to halt the deepening of the economic disaster. Millions are forced into unemployment and foreclosure. Tent cities called "Hoovertowns" spring up across America.  Desperation sets in and a large minority of the American people turn towards radical solutions from the left and right. Rumors of coups circulate. Federal, state, and local governments uses force to counter dissent and union activity.

Jan 1933: a run on banks causes many to collapse leading to further panic. Millions lose their life savings. The lame duck Hoover administration did nothing to stop the bank run and ensuing panic.

4 Mar 1933: Franklin Roosevelt is inaugurated as president having been elected on nothing more than the vague promise of hope and a "New Deal." Roosevelt assembles a team of Cabinet and sub-Cabinet officials who are willing to see beyond the 19th century economics of Hoover and begin trying pragmatic solutions to the nations dire problems.

5 Mar 1933: Roosevelt declares a "bank holiday" and forces the closure of the nation's banks and of all financial transactions.

9 Mar 1933: Congress passes Roosevelt's Emergency Banking Act. By the following day solvent banks begin reopening and the panic ends...

1933: The first Glass Steagle Act allows the federal government to use currency as banking reserves instead of specie (gold and other precious metals) essentially abolishing the "gold standard."

The Second Glass Steagle Act (officially the Banking Act of 1933):

creates the FDIC to insure deposits up to $100,000 to reestablish trust in commercial (deposit) banks.

sets up firewalls between commercial and investment banks forcing institutions to become one or the other. The merging of these two types of banks had caused dangerous conflicts of interest as the banks used their assets to buy bad investments sold by the investment banking side, then to toss more depositer cash to try to prop up failed ventures. Depositers were encouraged to use savings to buy highly leveraged and risky investments. Financial giant JP Morgan was the most prominent example of a mixed commercial/investment bank...

Forbade commercial banks to have more than 10% of investments in securities (generally bonds) with the exception of federal gov't bonds. Unscrupulous financiers often had forced banks to buy risky bond issues which led to the Panic of 1933...

1938: The Federal  National Mortgage Association (FNMA/ Fannie Mae) is created as a government agency as part of FDR's New Deal. The agency is given the task of improving liquidity in the moribund mortgage industry of the Great Depression with the primary goal of expanding the opportunity of lower and middle class buyers to be able to purchase affordable housing. For thirty years the agancy has a near monopoly on the secondary mortgage market. (Not made a semi-private GSE until 1968)

Fannie Mae bought mortgages from banks and other mortgage lenders, bundled them together, and resold them as "mortgage backed securities" on the secondary market, guarenteeing that the principal and interest would be paid even if the borrower defaulted. By doing this Fannie Mae providied lending institutions with fresh money to buy more mortgages.

Simply put Fannie Mae is created as a government run credit union for mortgage lenders. Each transaction is regulated and charged a small fee which is held in an insurance reserve pool against possible losses.

1956: The Bank Holding Act: is passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by President Eisenhower. The aim is to prevent banks from circumventing federal laws that forbid commercial banks to operate across state lines. Large banks had formed holding companies to purchase banks in other states and then operated them as subsidiaries in all but name only. The act was meant to prevent combinations that would have undue economic and political power or threaten the economic health of the nation if allowed to grow too large.

Sep 9 1965: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is created by an act of Congress (Democrat) and signed into law by President Johnson.

1968: President Johnson and ( Democratic Congress privatize Fannie Mae by selling stock to participating lending instituitions. The federal government explicitly excludes any government backing, insuring, or subsidies of the mortgage backed securities sold by Fannie Mae. The securities are not debts or obligations of the federal government but solely of Fannie Mae. Where private banks are required to maintain a capital to asset ratio (reserves) of greater than 3% Fannie Mae is required to hold only half the reserves. In good times this means Fannie Mae can better leverage capital to make a greater profit, but in bad times is at greater risk of insolvency.

1970 President Nixon signs a bill passed by a Democratic Congress founding the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) to expand the secondary market for mortgages in the US. The idea was to end the near monopoly Fannie Mae had on the secondary mortgage market by providing competition. Freddie Mac is created as a government sponsored enterprise (GSE) owned by the 12 federally chartered, regional Federal Home Loan Banks and governed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Generally speaking Fannie Mae dealt with banks and Freddie Mac dealt with the secondary mortgage market for Savings & Loans.

1977: Congress (Democrat controlled) passes and President Carter signs the Community Reinvestment Act which is designed to prevent "redlining" ( banks drawing a redline around certain areas and refusing any loan applications within that zone). The act mandated that commercial banks that took deposits/ had branches in low income areas make a "good faith effort" to lend within those communities to creditworthy borrowers. Enforcement of the original bill was lax, and the main requirements were that banks work with community boards and publish loan information in local publiucations. No lowering of credit standards was called for in the act.

Bankers predict that the act will result in fewer banking services in low income areas as prudent bankers would close branches instead of providing risky loans. 

1980: The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act is signed by President Jimmy Carter after passage by a Democratic Congress. The bill repeals portions of Reg. Q of the Glass Steagle Act and allows financial institutions to set their own interest rates given to depositers instead of the rate being set by the Fed.

1981: Credit card services giant American Express buys Shearson, the second largest securities firm in America.

Oct 12, 1982: Congress (Rep Senate and Dem House) passes and Ronald Reagan signs the Garn St. Germain Institutions Act of 1982 which repealed some of the regulatory provisions of the Roosevelt era Glass Steagle Act. This bill allowed the vast increase in the number of federally chartered Savings & Loans and is cited as a direct cause of the Savings & Loan Crisis of the late 1980s. This act specifically allowed (Title VII) for S&Ls to issue ARMs (Adjustible Rate Mortgages). The bill was a Reagan administration initiative and passed both houses of Congress with strong bi-partisan support. In his signing statement Reagan stated:

"... this bill also represents the first step in our administration's comprehensive program of financial deregulation. I particularly want to commend the leadership of the chairman, Senator Garn, and Chairman St Germain, along with Secretary Regan and his fine team at Treasury. They did a remarkable job forging a consensus within the Congress and among affected industries in favor of the bill's deregulatory provisions...Unfortunately, this legislation does not deal with the important question of delivery of other financial services, including securities activities by banks and other depository institutions. But I'm advised that many in the Congress want to put this question at the top of the banking deregulatory agenda next year, and I would strongly endorse such an initiative and hope that at the same time, the Congress will consider other proposals for more comprehensive deregulation which the administration advanced during the 97th Congress."

State chartered S&Ls rushed to become federally chartered to gain the benefits of the Act and to avoid state regulation.

1984: Charles Keating's American Financial Corporation purchases tiny Lincoln Savings for $51 million. Over the next four years Lincoln's claimed assets grew to $5 Billion.

1984: Shearson American Express buys investment banking/trading  firm Lehman Bros

Feb 1985: Keating hires Alan Greenspan as an economic consultant, in an unsuccessful effort to convince an oversight agency to exempt Lincoln Savings from certain regulations. Greenspan delivers a favorable report, writing that Lincoln Savings was "a financially strong institution that presents no foreseeable risk to depositors or the government." (Greenspan produced similar favorable reports on numerous other banks that also failed soon after.)

Mar 1985: The Home State Savings Bank of Cincinnati verges on collapse. Customers made aware of the imminent failure rush to withdraw deposits. Depositors of other S&Ls also begin panic withdraws. Gov. Celeste orders the closure of all Ohio S&Ls and only those that join the FDIC are allowed to reopen.

1986: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 is passed by Congress ( Republican Senate, Democratic House) and signed by Ronald Reagan. Unregulated S&Ls that made imprudent mortgage loans during the 1970s and early '80s were placed under greater pressure. The tax code change placed a further burden on the S&Ls as the tax benefits for money losing commercial real estate ventures were eliminated. Real estate values plummeted and the assets held by S&L were greatly reduced in value. Over the next few years the S&L meltdown led to the number of housing units built each year to drop from 1.8 million to 1 million ( a post WWII low).

1986: Large numbers of S&Ls begin to fail. Bad investments, lack of regulation, and the real estate bust are proximate causes. A major problem is that small S&Ls attract huge amounts of deposits by offering high rates of return on CDs. In one type of deal Mike Milken offers to deposit large quantities of cash in tiny S&Ls if even greater amounts of customer deposits are then used to buy junk bonds issued by his firm.

Nov 19, 1986: Rudy Giuliani, US Attorney, launches an investigation of Drexel Burnham Lambert and junk bond shyster Michael Milken. Milken and his firm are finally indicted in 1988 for insider trading, stock manipulation, and fraud. Under threat of a further RICO indictment Drexel pleads no contest to six felonies and agrees to pay a $650 million fine.

1987: The first "credit debt obligation" ( a "derivative") is issued by now defunct Drexel Burnham Lambert for the Imperial Savings Association. ISA goes bankrupt and is taken over in 1990 by the Resolution Trust Fund. The CDOs give financial managers less accountability and greater profit opportunities.

ANALYSIS:

A Collateralized Debt Obligation, or CDO, is a synthetic instrument created by bundling a pool of similar loans into a single investment that can be bought or sold. An investor that buys a CDO owns a right to a part of this pool's interest income and principal. For example, a bank might pool together 5,000 different mortgages into a CDO. An investor who purchases the CDO would be paid the interest owed by the 5,000 borrowers whose mortgages made up the CDO, but runs the risk that some borrowers don't pay back their loans.

1988: The Silverado Savings and Loan ( Director Neil Bush, son of then VP G.H.W. Bush and brother of George W. Bush) collapses at a cost of $1.3 billion to taxpayers. Director Bush admits to giving himself loans deemed improper and also approving $100 million in improper bad loans to business partners. Bush agrees to an out of court settlement negotiated by Reagan administration prosecutors, pays a $50,000 fine and is barred from any role in banking for his lifetime. In 1991 Bush and the other officers are ordered to pay a $26.5 million civil suit verdict against them.

1989: Lincoln Savings goes bankrupt. Charles Keating cheats 21,000 mostly elderly depositers out of $228 Million. Most of the investors were assured that the junk bonds they invested in were FDIC insured. They were not. Keating is indicted. The Keating Five (Senators John McCain, John Glenn, Alan Cranston, Dennis Deconcini, and Donald Riegle) are accused of improperly aiding Keating.

1989: Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (creating the Resolution Trust Fund) passes in a Democratic Congress and is signed by President George H.W. Bush in response to the Savings and Loan debacle. The act commits taxpayers to a massive bailout of the Savings & Loan Industry and ends up costing the taxpayers of America $160 Billion (1996 dollars). Freddie Mac, the primary market for mortgage backed securities for  Savings & Loans is reorganized, putting it under an appointed board of directors and HUD.

The act also requires the banking industry to issue CRA ratings publicly. 

ANALYSIS: The Savings & Loan Crisis of the late 1980s was in large part due to S & L s having a large percentage of their investment portfolios in fixed rate mortgages. When inflation ( which actually hit 21% one year {1981?} the S& Ls were stuck with securities based on a 7 or 8% fixed rate.) The value of the securities evaporated, capitalization and liquidity took a dive. (sound familiar?) As a result common business practices, accounting procedures, and new federal regulations said that banking institutions should not over-invest in fixed rate mortgages in case inflation ever took off again. Because of this adjustible rate mortgages (ARM) made a big splash in the 1980s...At one point even the most creditworthy home buyers could not get a fixed rate mortgage because of inflation and because no one would sell one!

Lenders could tell borrowers "I know the rate is 21% now, but it will DROP as inflation goes down since the rate is tagged to the Federal Reserve rate to banks. Bankers could safely buy more mortgage securities because the ARMs would adjust UPWARDS if inflation ever took off and because federal regulations only allowed 10%? of an institution's assets to be fixed rate mortgages or securities backed by fixed rate mortgages. Bankers, buyers, investors, and the federal government all could benefit by the prudent use of ARMs.

The lesson to be learned was not to be caught overinvesting in one particular asset that could flip you upside down if the business climate changed, Financiers learned the wrong simple lesson of "fixed = bad and ARM = good!" In the following years very savvy businessmen (and women) adapted to the new love affair with ARMs and mutate both the ARM mortgage and securities backed by them to something completely different. THERE WAS MONEY TO BE MADE!!!)

1989: After being warned that HUD under the Reagan and Bush 1 administrations was a "sewer", Catherine Austin Fitts takes an appointment as  Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner. She explains

"After issuing $9 billion in mortgage guarantees, HUD/FHA was to lose something approaching 50% of the value of the portfolio – a level of losses hard to explain with mortal logic. When my staff approached me with a proposal to bail out a mortgage company so they could continue to lose money for us, I asked why we should spend money to lose more money in a way that would harm communities. After a long silence during which 30 staff members intently studied their feet, one brave soul explained to me that the mortgage bank was owned and run by a major Republican donor. Shocked, I said. 'I am a major Republican donor,' and pointing to my presidential cufflinks that were adorning my French cuffs, 'I got a pair of cuff links. You get cuff links. You don't get $400 million of federal credit to throw down the drain.' My staff looked at me like I was so naive and clueless that there was no point in trying to communicate with me – better to let me learn the hard way."

1991: After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined that Senators Alan Cranston, Dennis DeConcini, and Donald Riegle had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings. Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised "poor judgment".

1992: The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety And Soundness Act is passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by President G.H.W.Bush. The act directs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to direct a portion of their lending to underserved communities.

1994: The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act repealed the Banking Act of 1956 allowed commercial banks to, legally operate across state lines for the first time. The idea of keeping banks small and local to prevent monopolistic influence and to limit the damage any bank's failure would cause the economy was abandoned. The bill was passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by President Clinton.

1994: Reigle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act authorized community development banks, credit unions, savings & loans, and other financial entities to provide credit services in "distressed communities." The entities work primary through community agencies and the Small Business Administration to provide credit to creditworthy borrowers in those communities.

1995: Fannie Mae buys $18.6 Billion in "sub prime" loans. Sub prime loans are allowed to be counted towards Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac requirements to provide affordable housing.

Jan 31 1995: New regulations for CRA require banks to make public their compliance with CRA requirements for lending in underserved communities.

1996: Chemical Bank purchases Chase Manhatten Bank using the name of the purchased company.

1997: $1 Billion in Credit Debt Obligations are created in the year (growing to $1 Trillion outstanding by 2005.) In the coming years the massive growth of CDOs leads to further removing of assets from actual financial transactions and the increase in speculation in subprime mortgage backed securities.

1997: Countrywide Financial spins off Countrywide Mortgage Investment as an independent IndyMac Bank. The idea was to set up a secondary market clearinghouse for mortgages too large to be sold thru Fannie Mae.

1998: In violation of the Glass Steagle Act of 1933 ( under a "temporary" exemption) Citicorp purchases Travelers Insurance with the goal of merging investment banking, commercial banking, insurance underwriting, and real estate under one roof. Citigroup alone spends $200 million in 1998 alone to lobby Congress to repeal the Glass Steagle Act. Senator Phil Gramm begins a one man mission to push the "reform" through Congress.

1999: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to allow commercial and investment banks to operate under the same roof is passed by a Republican Congress with bipartisan support and signed by President Bill Clinton. Among the signers of the bill are John McCain, Nancy Pelosi, and Phil Gramm. Lawmakers are assured that proper self-regulation will keep the commercial and investment divisions of banks from engaging in conflict of interest business practices. The vote of 90-8-1 in the Senate and 362-57-15 in the house was vetoproof and thus assured signing by Clinton. Clinton threatens to veto the act anyway unless lenders are required to follow the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and subsequent amendments. Clinton's provisions are included in the final bill.

2000: (Clinton Administration) HUD anti-predatory lending rules are put into place that disallowed risky, high-cost loans from being credited toward affordable housing goals.

2000: Chase Manhatten Bank purchases investment giantt JP Morga to form JP Morgan Chase.

2000: The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 is passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Clinton. Written by Enron lobbyists and originally introduced by Senator Phil Gramm (R-TX) the bill allows the unregulated trading of "credit default swaps" which later prove to be the undoing of insurance giant AIG and an $85 Billion dollar taxpayer bailout. The bill also exempts most over-the-counter energy trades and trading on electronic energy commodity markets, called the "Enron Loophole" and led to the manipulation of energy markets and the crash of that corporation. The Loophole, despite repeated attempts by Democratic legislators with a veto by G.W.Bush was not repealed until July 2008.

ANALYSIS: This bill sets up the meltdown of 2008 more than any other single piece of legislation. The act specifically prevents the regulation of "credit default swaps" which are essentially sold as insurance in case subprime loans were to go bad. Investors and portfolio managers could explain to investors that they were not engaging in risky investment by purchasing securities based on subprime loans because the CDSs provide insurance against loss if defaults occured. The sale of subprime loans and of secondary market instruments (CDOs) based on subprime loans explodes into the hundreds of billions of dollars..Essentially insurance, the financial industry fought and paid to keep CDSs out of insurance regulations because this would have required the set-aside of reserves to back them if defaults on the underlying real estate increased dramatically (as had occured in earlier recessions).

CDSs are even sold as purely speculative instruments, as investors bet on whether or not securities will perform, even when the speculators have no financial stake in the underlying securities themselves. THE MARKET FOR THES INSTRUMENTS IS COMPLETELY UNREGULATED BY LAW!

2001: U.S. Department of Treasury guidelines define "Subprime borrowers typically have weakened credit histories that include payment delinquencies, and possibly more severe problems such as charge-offs, judgments, and bankruptcies. They may also display reduced repayment capacity as measured by credit scores, debt to income ratios, or other criteria that may encompass borrowers with incomplete credit histories."

In the financial markets "sub-prime" means junk, and includes loans not only for high risk consumers but also speculative driven mortgages that are non-traditional. Interest only and ARM mortgages used to fuel speculative purchases of properties in an appreciating real estate market are also commonly refered to as "sub-prime."

2002: Bush's Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill resigns because of disagreements with Bush over his tax cut program. O'Neill predicted budget deficits ballooning to $500 Billion  (which came true). The Bush administration dismissed his numbers as faulty.

Mar 20 2003: Begining of the Iraq War. The Bush Administration claims the War will take six weeks until troops can begin coming home (six months maximun) and that the war will pay for itself with Iraqi oil. Instead the war drags on through 2008 and adds over $150 Billion to the Federal budget deficit each year. Through Mar 2008 the direct war costs are estimated at $865 Billion and final costs conservatively expected to exceed $3 Trillion.

Apr 23 2003: The world's ten largest investment firms ( Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros, Merrill Lynch, USB, Morgan Stanley, Salomon Smith Barney, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse) settle with the SEC over corruption charges, essentially that analysts were being paid to improperly rate the investment instruments being sold by the firms to the public.

Sept 2003: Fortune Magazine describes Countrywide Financial as the "23,000% stock" with a better rate of return for investors than Washington Mutual, WalMart, or Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway.

2004: Under pressure from investors the Bush administration drops Clinton era HUD regulations that do not allow predatory loans to be counted towards fullfilment of affordable housing goals. High risk loans are once again counted towards affordable housing numbers.

2004: $157 Billion of CDOs are issued worldwide

2004: JP Morgan Chase merges with Capital One Corp. The Chase and Capital One names are used for retail banking and credit card services. JP Morgan is used for investment banking.

Fannie Mae buys $175 Billion in sub prime loans (up from $18.6 Billion in 1995)

Sept 2004: A federal investigation discovers that during the tenure of former Clinton Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae James Jackson (1991-1998)expenses of $100,000,000 went unreported to allow senior officials to receive performance bonuses.

Dec 21 2004: Bush Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Franklin Raines accepts "early retirement" because of seperate investigations by HUD, the FBI, and a grand jury. He was accused of creative accounting to allow him to "earn" multi-million dollar bonuses for performance.

2005-7: Chairman Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide begins selling his stock, earning almost $300 Million in profits. (A class action suit of former stockholders is currently pending against Mozilo claiming violation of  secuities laws and regulations in his stock selloff.)

2005: $272 Billion of CDOs are issued worldwide

2005: A study by the Census Bureau estimates the number of foreign born inhabitants of the US at 35 Million, the highest proportion in eight decades. Of that number 18 to 20 million are 'undocumented" or 'illegal' aliens. The Census Bureau report draws no conclusions concerning employment but the general consensus among economists is that: the illegal/undocumented workers place a downward pressure on the wages and salaries of native born citizens and legal immigrants; and that employment of native born inhabitants and legal immigrants is decreased. The lowering of wages primarily effects the second lowest quintile of income earners, contributing to the skewing of income distribution and a drop in consumer spending that makes up over 60% of economic activity...

Jan 2005: Senators Hagel (R-Ne) Dole (R-NC) and Sununu (R-NH) sponsor a bill (the Federal Housing Regulatory Reform Act, S-190, 109th Congress) calling for increased oversight and a management shakeup at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and warns of consequences if mismanagement is allowed to continue. Senator McCain allows his name to be added as a co-sponsor of the bill. The bill fails to come to a vote in the Republican controlled committee(because of its criticism of Bush Administration appointees) and an alternative bill sponsored by Sen. Shelby (R-AL) is voted on and passes 11-9 along party lines. The Republican majority leadership tables the proposal which never comes up for a floor debate or vote ...This bill is cited by McCain in his election bid as proof of his warnings about Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

2005-2007: Subprime lender Countrywide boss Angelo Mozilo, seeing the handwriting on the wall, begins selling off his stock in the company.

Sept 2005: Bush Administration greatly reduces the effectiveness of the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) deeming them unnessary and burdensome as loans are available outside of government programs. Despite the gutting of the CRA loans to innercity neighborhoods continue to soar, showing that the CRA had very little to do with the vast expansion of sub-prime loans into minority neighborhoods. Total bank loans made under the auspices of the CRA are estimated in the "tens of billions" of dollars with the great majority of the loans performing profitably.

Jan 1 2006 Bank of America buys the nations largest credit card giant MBNA. MBNA owns or manages $122 in credit card debt, and had invented the sale of securities based on credit card debt. Most of the credit card securities are owned by pension funds and insurance companies.

2006: Subprime mortgages purchased in 2006 amount to approx. $600 Biilion, about 20% of all mortgages sold (up from 9% 1996-2004).

22% of homes puchased ( 1.65 million units) during the year are bought as speculative investments. Another 14% (1.07) million units are purchased as second homes or vacation homes. An estimated 85% of condos purchased in the overheated Miami housing market are bought as investments. Like all Ponzi schemes, when the available pool of speculators able to further drive up the price of overvalued homes in speculative markets dried up the bubble burst. Speculators either did not enter the housing market or began trying to sell off properties at this point. Home values began to tumble. The reset of ARM and interest only mortgages made speculative investments untenable in a falling market. Foreclosures and further downward pressure on housing prices resulted. An economic downturn and the rset of ARMs also adds to the increase of foreclosures in non-speculative loans.

2006: Over 45% of the sub-prime loans written by sub-prime giant Countrywide Financial are too large to be sold to Fannie Mae. These "non-conforming" loans were above the $417,000 limit. A spinoff company, IndyMac, serves as a clearinghouse for selling securities originating from mortgages too large to be sold thru Fannie Mae.

Countrywide originates 20% of all mortgages sold in the US.equalling 3.5% of GDP.

2006: $552 Billion of CDOs are issued worldwide. The total of CDOs floating around the world at the end of 2006 totals over TWO TRILLION dollars.

First Quarter 2007: Countrywide Financial in it's annual report states that 19% of its subprime loans are "nonperforming" (delinquent or in foreclosure).

2007: $503 billion of CDOs are issued worldwide.

June 28 2007: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight certifies that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are adequately capitalized for Q1 2007.

Aug 2007: Shearson Lehman American Express closes its sub prime lender BMC Mortgage citing poor market conditions.

Third Quarter 2007: Sub-prime Adjustible Rate Mortgages (ARM) represent 6.8% of outstanding US mortgages but 43% of all foreclosures started. Sub-prime fixed rate mortgages represent 6.3% and 12% of foreclosures starting in this period.

Nov 2007: Realizing that the company was too deep in the private secondary mortgage market not covered under Fannie Mae, IndyMac changes business plans in a panic. Indymac dramtically shifts from to mortgages that can be sold thru Fannie Mae instead of acting as a clearinghouse for the private secondary mortgage market. The shift comes too late...

IndyMac shifts $10.7 Billion in non-agency mortgages from the "held for investment" status to the Oh fuck we gotta hurry and sell these to raise capital category, essentially dumping these securities on an already depressed market for such securities. This further lowers the market price of non-agency securities across the industry causing all dealers in such securities to become more overleveraged. (IndyMac begins looking for a White Knight buyer realizing the company is undercapitalized and would never be able to raise the necessary money alone.)

2007: Fortune Magazine recognizes Bear Stearns as America's most admired securities firm.

Dec 2007: The outstanding amount of credit default swaps (cds) outstanding is estimated to be $62.2 TRILLION.

Jan 11 2008: Bank of America announces plans to buy Countrywide Financial.

Feb 13 2008: President Bush signs the Economic Stimulus Package giving "rebate" checks of up to $1600 to taxpayers and accelerating depreciation deductions for small business in an attempt to ward off recession. Estimated cost of $152 Billion for 2008 and $276 Billion over ten years.

Mar 2008: Bush's Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Alphonso Jackson, resigns after an FBI investigation, grand jury probe, and internal HUD investigation look into Jackson's conflict of interest vis-a-vis a $127 million contract awarded to Columbia Residential, a firm Jackson had substantial business dealing with.

The Federal Reserve grants a loan of billions to investment banking, securities trader Bear Stearns in an attempt to head off bankruptcy.

Mar 16 2008: JP Morgan Chase announces FDIC approval of the purchase of failed investment firm Bear Stearns.

Mar 31 2008: IndyMac Bank announces losses of $1.85 billion from nonperforming loans and later announces that figure is expected to rise for the next quarter.

April 2008: Moodys drop the bond rating on non-governmental mortgage backed securities dramatically affecting the capitalization of financial institutions across the industry. In one fell swoop the value of billions of dollars of securities drops and their perceived risk rises sharply. Moodys had been sharply criticized for over-rating such instruments in the past.

May 2008: Senate Banking Committe Chairman Dodd (D-CT) along with Rep. Barney Franks (D-MA) sponsor a plan that would allow the FHA to insure $400 Billion in sub prime mortgages converted to fixed rate mortgages at market rates. President Bush announces he will veto any such bill as a bailout.

May 12 2008: IndyMac bank suspends dividend payments (after halfing them the quarter before) and announces suspension of interest payments on some prefered securities.

First Half 2008: Shearson Lehman American Express stock drops 73% in th first half after the company reports huge losses in the sub prime mortgage and secondary mortgage security market.

May 30 2008: JP Morgan Chase acquires bankrupt Bear Stearns for $10 per share, down from $133 a year earlier.

Jun 2008: The Wall Street Journal breaks a story about troubled sub-prime lender Countrywide making sweatheart deals for politicians under the umbrella of "Friends of Anjelo" (Chairman Anjelo Mozilo). Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT current Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee) Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND current Chairman of the Banking Committee), Franklin Raines ( disgraced former Chairman/CEO of Fannie Mae and Obama advisor), Donna Shalala (former Clinton Secretary of Health and Human Services), James Jackson (former Clinton CEO/Chairman of Fannie Mae), and Alphonso Jackson (former Bush Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) all received preferential mortgage terms from Countrywide.

Jun 5 2008: Bank of America announces that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System have approved the planned purchase of Countrywide Financial. The deal is completed on Jul 1. Bof A puchases Countrywide for $4 Biilion, one sixth of the company's $24 Billion value from a year earlier.

Jun 26 2008: Sen Charles Schumer (D-NY) releases several letters questioning the viability of Savings and Loan sub-prime IndyMac. This begins a run on the bank with depositors withdrawing several billion dollars. IndyMac, facing a liquidity crisis already is sent over the brink.

July 2008: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are granted access to low interest loans from the Federal Reserve already available to banks. A prohibition against the Treasury Dept buying Fannie Mae? Freddie Mac stock is suspended. The measures are instituted to bolster financial market confidence.

Jul 11 2008: IndyMac Bank (formerly Countrywide Mortgage Investment) is seized by federal regulators.

Jul 28 2008: Former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers (1999-2001) in an article in the Washington Post opposes the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac bailout because the people in charge are not ousted from entities they helped run into the ground and who would continue to operate under the same faulty premises..

Aug 2008: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock falls to only 10% of the value from the previous year.

Sep 7 2008: Fannie Mae, a privately held corporation and a government sponsored enterprise (GSE) is put into a federal government conservatorship. The executves f th cprations ae repaced d te government takes an eqty sake in the GSEs (Government Sponrd Enrpres).

Sept 10 2008: Lehman Brothers says it lost $3.9 billion in its fiscal third quarter and plans a number of moves to shore up its balance sheet. The firm says it will consider all "strategic alternatives," a Wall Street synonym for seeking a buyer.

Sept 14 2008: After a weekend of furious negotiations, U.S. regulators make it clear there will be no government bailout of Lehman Brothers. Fearful of the likely fallout from a Lehman failure, Merrill Lynch & Co. arranges a hasty deal to be bought by Bank of America Corp. for $50 billion in stock.

Sep 15 2008: Shearson Lehman American Express announces filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the largest bankruptcy in US history. Between 1994 and 2007 the company's revenue had increased from $2.7 to $19 Billion and assets had grown to $275 Billion.

Sep 16 2008: The Federal Reserve announces an $85 Billion bailout of insurance giant AIG which got into desperate financial trouble dealing in "credit swap defaults" and insuring the trades of other companies in those instruments. (see 2000 Commodities Futures Modernization Act)

Sept 16 2008:  Two remaining major independent investment banks, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, report third-quarter profits above Wall Street's expectations. A massive pullout from Reserve Primary Fund, a $62 billion money market fund, causes its holdings to fall below its total deposits. Money market funds are typically considered to be almost as safe as cash.

Sept 17 2008: A major investor in ailing Washington Mutual Inc. removes a potential obstacle to a sale of the thrift. Morgan Stanley and Wachovia Corp. are said to be in talks about a possible combination.

Sept 18 2008: The Fed and several other central banks inject as much as $180 billion into money markets. The Fed also added another $55 billion in overnight loans. Putnam Investments closes a $15 billion money market fund after institutional clients pull their cash.

Sept 19 2008: Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says he will formulate a plan to help banks remove toxic assets from their books. The Fed says it will expand its emergency lending, let commercial banks finance purchases of asset-backed paper from money market funds. Injects another $20 billion in temporary reserves. The Treasury Dept. says it will tap into a Depression-era fund to provide guarantees for money market funds. SEC enacts temporary ban on the short-selling of nearly 800 financial stocks. (Goldman Sachs and others made billions on short selling, essentially betting the price of rival stocks would fall.)

Sept 22 2008: Congressional leaders and the Bush administration haggle over details of the massive $700 billion financial bailout legislation. Main stumbling blocks are executive compensation, government purchase of equity in faltering companies, allowing judges to rewrite bankrupt homeowners' mortgages so they could avoid foreclosure.

Sept 22 2008: The last two remaining major investment banks, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase, receive Federal Reserve approval to transition from investment banks (raising and selling securities) to bank holding companies (owning other banks).

Sept 23 2008:Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson testify before Senate Banking Committe about their bailout plan. Lawmakers in both parties demanded changes to the administration's proposal despite dire warnings from top economic officials of recessions, layoffs and lost homes if Congress doesn't approve it quickly.

Sept 24 2008: Lawmakers and Bush administration officials got closer to agreement on a Wall Street rescue plan but were still wrangling over major elements, including how to phase in the eye-popping cost without spooking markets and the government's stake in troubled companies as part of the rescue. The president, in a prime-time television address, acknowledged that the bailout would be a "tough vote" for lawmakers but said failing to approve it would risk dire consequences for the economy and most Americans.

Sept 25 2008: The FDIC forced the closure of Washington Mutual Savings (WaMu, the largest Savings & Loan in the US) and sells the assets to JP Morgan Chase. Also after early reports of agreement "in principal" on the Wall Street bailout, a White House meeting descended into arguments between Republicans which put the plan in jeopardy.

Sept 29 2008: The House defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue package, ignoring urgent pleas from President Bush and congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle to quickly bail out the staggering financial industry. Stocks plummeted on Wall Street even before the 228-205 vote to reject the bill was announced on the House floor (losing $1 Trillion in value to shareholders).

Sept 30 2008: Congressional leaders scrambled to come up with changes to help them sell the failed $700 billion U.S. financial rescue plan to rank-and-file members. One idea gathering support: raise the federal deposit insurance limit to reassure nervous savers and help small businesses. Meanwhile, President Bush made another statement at the White House. "Congress must act," he said.

Oct 1 2008: The Senate passes its own version of the bailout plan (now called a "rescue plan") which includes and extra $150 Billion in tax cuts and pork to try to influence the coming House vote.

Oct 2 2008: A Fed report revealed banks and investment firms ramped up borrowing from the Federal Reserve's emergency lending facility over the past week, providing fresh evidence of the credit stresses squeezing the country. Meanwhile President Bush and congressional backers of the $700 billion financial industry bailout carried out high-intensity lobbying on the eve of a crucial House vote.

Oct 3 2008: Wells Fargo Bank announces an agreement to purchase ailing Wachovia Bank in a private purchase. The deal catches Citigroup by surprise after that company and federal regulators already worked out a deal whereby Citibank purchases Wachovia with federal guarantees. Citigroup demands the acquisition be stopped.

Oct 5 2008: Bank of America announces a court settlement providing that tens of thousands of former Contrywide Financial subprime loans will be renegotiated to provide lower interest rates for borrowers whose rates have reset.

Oct 7 2008: The Federal Reserve has announced a radical plan to buy massive amounts of short-term debts in a dramatic effort to break through a credit clog that is imperiling the economy. The Federal Reserve said Tuesday it will buy "commercial paper," a short-term financing mechanism that many companies rely on to finance their day-to-day operations, such as purchasing supplies or making payrolls.

2:35 PM - 15 Comments - 20 Kudos - Add Comment

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

It’s All The Fault Of Do-Gooder LIBERALS and MINORITIES!
Current mood: amused
Category: News and Politics

The right wing propaganda machine has gone into high gear in the last week to remanufacture history, subvert objective truth, and create a mythology to account for the utter and undeniable failure of the whole "greed is good" paradigm that our economy has operated under for a generation. In this psychotic and schizophrenic reconstruction of reality the poor, poor Republicans were screaming for regulation of the financial markets, only to be thwarted by evil Democrats at every turn; and poor, poor Wall Street was forced to make foolish loans to minorities because these same liberals put a gun to their head. In essence the Rabid Right Dream Machine (led by Brit Hume and the Fox Entertainment News) broadcasts instructions to the faithful on how to make tin-foil hats, put fingers tightly in their ears, and shout "La-La-La" if anyone tries to find the truth...

The new delusional construct that feeds the inate bigotry of the anti-intellectual spuds on the right goes like this: In 1977 President Carter and the Democrats passed the Community Reinvestment Act to force bankers to lend money to minorities who were not credit worthy, and since that date liberals have weakened oversight standards and created dubious financial instruments to force such risky lending. According to the new reality tv/radio the Republicans have been steadfast in promoting regulation and sensible business practices... In essence they posit once again that all our ills are due to irresponsible liberals pandering to lazy darkies. It's a lie with a ready audience waiting for the new "reality" show from Fox...

Let's examine a few OBJECTIVE truths:

First, the CRA of 1977 simply required that DEPOSIT banks make a good faith effort to invest some of the deposits made in poorer neighborhoods to be reinvested in those neighborhoods. The CRA attempted to end a practice called "redlining" where bankers literally drew red lines on maps and refused to make loans in poorer areas. Low income people in those areas were good enough to make deposits, but not good enough for loans under ANY circumstances...

The CRA originally had no enforcement provisions and required only that local banks make a "good faith" effort to provide safe loans to creditworthy customers within areas formerly redlined (such as advertise in local papers). Investment banks and mortgage brokers were not covered and still are not covered under the provisions of the CRA. Despite some strengthening of the CRA the act has been responsible for only a tiny proportion of the bad mortgages written that resulted in our current crisis...

Oh, and at the time the CRA was passed (and every time it was strengthened) the warnings from bankers were the OPPOSITE of the result the rabid right is crying about. Local bankers warned that if their institutions were forced to make loans in low income areas where they had branches the result would be that sensible bankers would CLOSE those branches and FEWER loans would be available. (But that prediction doesn't fit well with the cut and paste revisionism of Fox and Sean and Rush.)

Remember the extremely important point that the CRA only applied to LOCAL DEPOSIT BANKS that operated in a neighborhood and NOT to mortgage brokers or investment banks that did the vast majority of sub-prime mortgages. (CORRECTION: Under the Clinton administration banks covered by the CRA of 1977 was expanded to include those which benefited under the deregulation of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Still the loans written covered by the CRA are in the amount of tens of billions of the TRILLIONS of dollars of sub-prime lending.)

Second: the myth machine is running at max RPMs to shift all the blame to Democrats while portraying all Republicans as honest and efficient businessmen who have spent thirty years warning us against this insidious program that is meant to redistribute wealth from the deserving and responsible financial institutions to the hands of welfare loving, liberal minorities. McCain has been recast, not as the scion of destroying burdensome regulations that prevent business from doing business, but as Jereniah warning us of the dire consequences of government forcing socialist programs to subvert the marketplace.

Fox has done a masterful job of playing the game of intellectual dishonesty and the tin-foil hat crowd has received the mindfuck transmissions with glee. Thirty years of legislative history have been reviewed to cull a few soundbytes, which played out of context, seem to support the newest paranoid conspiracy theory. In one clip Barney Franks is literally cut off in midsentence ( when discussing the viability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) and ingeniously identified as now the chairman of the influential House Financial Services Committee. The fact that Franks was in the minority when the culled statement was made is glossed over. The fact that REPUBLICANS were to blame for doing nothing when they controlled both the House and Senate is ignored. The truth is inconvenient. The truth must be re-edited for consumption by the credulous zombies not just ready but eager to absorb the latest in a series of simplistic lies.

Third: the denial of truth posits that the only reason that Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, investment banks, AIG, and the host of other institution failed is because of the obligations forced upon them by the CRA. This is the most insipid of all the allegations made to support this far-fetched delusion. Again, only a tiny percentage of sub-prime loans were made under the aegis of the CRA. Cause and effect are completely decoupled when the fact that mortgage brokers and investment banks (who were never covered under the CRA) went absolutely crazy promoting sub-prime loans EVERYWHERE in the country, including low-income/minority neighborhoods is completely ignored. Bad business decisions are falsely attached to a program that has nothing to do with said loans; but of course reality does not matter.

Fourth: Our current financial difficulities are largely the result of "derivatives" that have absolutely NOTHING to do with "affirmative action" in any way. The tainted financial instruments are clogging our credit markets and THAT is what is causing the panic. Derivatives are a BUSINESS problem and mistake allowed by the LACK of regulation and oversight. This is inconvenient to the proponents of rubber-room theories though...The failiure is primarily a BUSINESS failure magnified by government looking the other way in return for campaign financing and false prosperity.

A critical thinker can point out that Clinton signed much of the responsible legislation that was first introduced and passed by a Republican Congress. The true believers take this information, adjust their hats, and reconform reality to say "See it's Clinton's fault." Someone in tune with objective reality can admit that Nancy Pelosi voted for the responsible bills, but the partisan pinheads find it impossible to admit that McCain COSPONSORED the bills and his mentor Phil Gramm was the crusader who wrote the bills and slammed them through a Republican controlled Congress. Responsible people will try to discern true causes and see enough blame to go around. The neo-con elect will just try to give you a tin-foil hat to wear so they don't look stupid alone...

 

 

10:53 AM - 39 Comments - 27 Kudos - Add Comment

Monday, September 29, 2008

The BIG Con!
Category: News and Politics

Paul Newman died yesterday. We lost a great actor, entrepeneur, and philanthropist extraordinaoire. One gift he gave us was his role in "The Sting." This wonderful movie (which I am refering to from thirty year old memories) was about the BIG CON. Newman's and Redford's characters fleece Robert Shaw's character in a very elaborate hoax and take him for a fortune. Newman and Redford set up a fake bookie parlor and wire, employing dozens of conmen to complete the setup. The mark falls for it hook, line, and sinker, loses a fortune, and walks away never realizing he has been bamboozled. The last bit was the important part. Robert Shaw's character never knew he was taken!

Well folks we just fell victim to a swindle much more elaborate than even Hollywood could dream up. Not only was the scam the largest of all time, looking for TRILLIONS from the taxpayer: it was also a variation called THE LONG CON.

The Long Con requires infinite skill to perpetuate and actually requires the participation of the mark (victim). Well for nearly thirty years we have succumbed to the confidence game of pretend market capitalism, free trade, trickle down economics, shifting taxes to regressive sources, the invisible hand of the marketplace, and all the other phantasmagorical bullshit of the ULTIMATE CON! And we are only in the middle of this con, not the end!!!

For a generation Americans have watched the supposed Middle-Class erode away. Blue collar guys n gals watched it all slip away. White collar people never realized the shifting burden of increasing state and local taxes eroded their incomes while those at the top got a Federal Tax Holiday. But here's where it gets interesting: Not only did the con men bleed us for a generation, they are handing us a bill that will take another generation to pay off AND their candidate has convinces tens of millions of voters that the con-men are due ANOTHER series of tax cuts...

Just remember that when a con-man puts on a frock and collar it does not make him a priest. Just because these scammers have been spewing the gospel of Adam Smith doesn't make them free market capitalists. That perhaps is their most brilliant of performances...

Can you say Flim-Flam boys n girls???

 

9:00 PM - 18 Comments - 22 Kudos - Add Comment

Bailout, Compromise, and Political Tactics...
Category: News and Politics

In this time when American institutions seem to be crumbling and we have less and less faith in the system, it seems that our political process may have worked!

Last week President Bush handed a one page ultimatum to Congress and the American people demanding a TRILLION DOLLAR bailout of the financial sector. In this bill a president who has lost the support of nearly all Americans demanded dictatorial powers for the executive branch. The Treasury Secretary would have had the power to decide how and where to spend the approved funds and all oversight and accountability was specifically written out of the bill; furthermore Bush demanded IMMEDIATE passage with the threat that not doing so in a day or two would cause another Great Depression.

The public was absolutely outraged with many good reasons. Democrats were skeptical (both in the House and Senate) and demanded changes. The REAL heroes here may well be John Boehner (R-Oh) and a group of insurgent House Republicans.

Often I don't like Boehner very much, but I do respect him. He is an old line, no nonsense conservative. Unlike most, he has a real set of core values and these values came into play this last week. These House rebels stood on principle and told Bush HELL NO. Instead of handing Paulsen and Bush the biggest blank check ever, they insisted on a different approach. The Tories demanded that instead of the taxpayers picking up the bill that the feds set up an insurance program covering the "toxic" instruments clogging the financial markets. Boehner and his allies insisted the feds merely operate a program that will be paid for by "Wall Street" and that will drastically lower the exposure of taxpayers.

I haven't seen details yet. I don't know if Boehner's Trojan Horse tax cuts were stripped from the compromise or not. I'm also uncertain of just how far the insurance program will go and how much of the bailout remains. From initial reports it appears the system worked.:

An unpopular president attempts to ramrod a horrendous bill through Congress using fear to try to provoke hasty action. The public screams in outrage. House Republicans refuse to sign on. Democrats state they will nott support any bill without Republican backing. They know the Republicans will slander the Dems for a generation if they are the party backing a Bush socialization of the financial markets. All parties come together and come up with a compromise that seems much better for the taxpayer and even Wall Street...In Congress both powerplays and principles seem to have worked as the "Founding Fathers" envisioned...

Paraphrasing Churchill: This is not the begining of the end of our difficulties, but maybe we have seen the end of the begining....

UPDATE 4pm EST: Well, look what I get for being hopeful. Pelosi opens her mouth and the House Republicans throw a fit... So much for compromise today...

9:59 AM - 21 Comments - 16 Kudos - Add Comment

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Quality vs. Quantity: We Did It Before...
Category: News and Politics

Sitting on my desk are three ancient coins minted during the reign of Roman Emperor Theodosius I. These three coins were part of a hoard found buried in a farmer's field in Eastern Turkey for sixteen centuries. From the dates of the coins (and a knowledge of Roman history) I can ascertain that these coins were buried about 395AD in response to the Huns invading that area and destroying city after city. The owner of the buried treasure, which included my three little pennies, proved unable to retrieve it after the barbarians had returned across the mountains with their spoils (which did not include his/her savings). I keep these coins for many reasons, but mainly as a reminder.

Money is easy to overvalue. Because money can be traded for damned near anything it is seen as the absolute distillation of well-being. More money = good, less money = bad is an easy fallacy to fall prey to. The unfortunate loser of the ancient hoard at least had a stack of coins to rub between his fingers when he fell for this notion. In modern times the belief has become much more abstract and complex.

For years, we as a society, have assumed that our lives are better because we have more money to spend. A bigger house and car, more pairs of shoes, the latest techno-gizmo all symbolize the new quantification of happiness. As individuals our desire for new and shiny threatens to turn us from Homo Sapiens (thinking man) into Homo Omnivorus (all devouring man). For all of us the entire thrust and focus of our society has been to create an environment of more, more, more. Our group consciousness is instinctively that more must be better, and this obviously ain't true. A few examples below.

If politicians tell us that our GDP went up 3% in a year this is ballyhoed as great progress. But what if all the extra money is spent for outfits for small dogs, extra healthcare costs to pay for an increase of 100,000 gunshot victims, and a government program to send every taxpayer a complete set of Britney Spears CDs? Did our quality of life go up 3% as we want to believe?

Well folks, my examples may seem ludicrous; but the exaggeration is not as great as they seem. As individuals and as a society we have made decisions even more inane than the examples I give. We have surrendered nearly every sensibility to the notion that bigger and more is better.

If we, as a nation, import more oil our GDP automatically goes up. Why? because the sale of the product down the line produces transactions measured that inflate that number. Achieving fuel efficiency actually appears to reduce GDP (or growth in GDP) because the $$$ are not spent.

A bigger home is definitely better correct? What if it means a monumental increase in stress? Leads to more divorces? Causes an insane financial/real estate bubble where GDP keeps growing till KA-POP?

All of us, myself included use "more/bigger is better" as a baseline for our understanding of personal and public economics. Sometimes we can allow other values to override this. A teen might call in sick on Saturday to PAR-TAY. Parents might forego the new Lexus to save more for Josh's and Amber's education. Government might actually not fund the Britney CDs for everyone program. Even still we must understand that our basic functioning assumption is still more = better. We've have merely succeeded in stepping around it just this once.

Let's instead try to keep in mind an entirely different assumption: "Quality counts." Just possibly we should stress this idea until it becomes at least co-equal in our mindset with the aforementioned premise. Let's automatically look for the quality benefits...

When a politician brags about a net increase of a million jobs we clap. If seven million people lose what are commonly called "good" jobs and eight million jobs are created flippin' burgers at minimum wage are created, is that progess? Is it better?

Let's examine our private lives and our role in the public life of America. Is it possible to find ways to improve quality without the imperative of MORE? Would it be an improvement to get rid of cable and DSL for a year and concentrate on reading to the kids, going to the park, and raising a garden?

Mostly I ask this out of concern. We as a people are facing hard times. Most of us will see tighter incomes and tighter credit. Can we just maybe take a breath and realize the benefits this may bring instead of lamenting the inability to afford XM Radio, or the new I-Phone that monitors your halitosis? Would raising a garden and learning to cook from scratch sometimes really be such a sacrifice?

For our own happiness we can learn to look at times where quantity is diminished as a time where we learned that quality counts...

...and I will look at my three little coins again and remember.

And lastly as a famous sage once said "Don't Worry, Be Happy"

 

3:32 PM - 24 Comments - 32 Kudos - Add Comment

Saturday, September 27, 2008

The "N" Word
Current mood: blustery
Category: News and Politics

From time to time I have used the word nigger in some of my blogs and some of my comments on other peoples' blogs. I do believe I have pissed some people off despite the context in which I use this foul and offensive word. Despite the knowledge I might alienate a person or two I absolutely refuse to stoop to the liberal white euphemism of "the 'n' word."

In no way do I want to try and assume the mantle of some champion campaigner against racism. I'm just an ordinary guy of 52 who has been around. From the time I first became aware of racism I have refused to compromise, will never look the other way, and have often used my fists when words weren't worthwhile. In truth I am strident against racism and any other form of irrational, powermongering abuse of the underdog.

Many times I've gotten in peoples' faces when they look around a room, and only when the complexion  is correct, begin with encoded racist garbage. "Say it!. Say what you mean! C.mon." is my response. I refuse to back down out of politeness or pretend I am being silent "because it won't make a difference anyway." Instead I challenge and am perfectly willing to go wherever the challenge leads. Once I even lost a job because I did this to my employer who admitted he would never hire an African American for anything except janitor.

No, I am not trying to establish credentials, just pointing out that on this issue I am uncompromising. But just as I refuse to allow the hatemongers to get away with euphemisms I also disdain the lily-livered liberal tendency to sanitize hard and obvious truths. I refuse to slip in the chickenshit surrender of using "the 'n' word."

My stridency may upset people. I do understand; but if I give in and use the shallow code words of the politically correct I will also lose the ability to confront. I don't apologize, I just ask you to understand if I have pissed you off...

NOTE: Somehow for the first time Myspaz changed my title for this blog to "The."

1:24 PM - 13 Comments - 17 Kudos - Add Comment


About  |  FAQ  |  Terms  |  Privacy  |  Safety Tips  |  Contact MySpace  |  Promote!  |  Advertise  |  MySpace Shop

©2003-2008 MySpace.com. All Rights Reserved.