|
Bring Patric Brian Shaver and Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron Home
Category: Goals, Plans, Hopes
Marilyn
Date: Apr 2, 2008 8:59 AM
To: SPC Brian P Shavers Mom - Determined and
myspace.com/peskyvarmt
Date: Apr 2, 2008 8:59
Subject:
RE: Hey there ’Dreamer of Dreams’... guess what!
Body:
Dear Pam,
Hey, your Yuwie account is mad at you for content and locked pending canselation. ? Go over there and smooth thing out with them. What did you do? You?
Bleu was named Alexander because it meant ’gracious gift from God’, and had nothing to do with the judge Alexander, who re instated my case against State Farm Insurance after he dismissed it with prejudice, but, I also picked his name so he could call himself anything he liked professional or casual; like, Tom, Zane, Zander, Bleu, Alex, so forth... But, we all called him Bleu and that is what has stuck. I love it and know he must one day take on something other than what his loved oned called him all his life, that would be particularly true if he did wind up a judge... We will see.
Well that is a long way off and I hope to pick up where we left off because he was so close to me. I know this must have hurt him but I don’t imagine it did him as much as it did me.
Now what is funny is his dad did not call me to verify if all was well or if he had any concerns about Bleu having contact with me now. This weekend visit was arranged without one single investigation from Bleu’s dad into why he claimed he took him in the first place. It was, Dolly, who takes the credit, the ’foster’ mother for Melanie, whom I have been ’very’ mean to as she put it. I told her I had hired a detective and in the past told her, "When I get Bleu back you will never see him! Ever! But, if I had him, and you had not betrayed me, you would have got to see me, meaning him, too, much more often. That is in regard to the visits she is stealing from me, by who knows what compact with Zack, while they put Nazi social pressure on me to comply with TREASON UNDER THE PAIN OF THE IMPLIED SOCIAL EXPERTS MEADALING WHILE PROMISING TO ENFORCEME JUDGE HORNERS DEATH PENALTY THREAT!!!!
Grrrrrrrrrrr & No Due Process at all...
Grrrrrrrrrrr Not once did I get to face my non-accusers in Polk County, not a one of them!
My daughter told me that, "Dolly knows I will not appreciate what she did for me and that Dolly said, ’I would just brush it off as, ’she owed it to me’, because I have been so mean to her lately". Can you believe the arrogance of people! ’She owed me’... what a snippety way to send the message, "I’m in control over your children".
Last time I was at her house, Easter, I walked out just as they set the table and sat down. I called her and said; "Don’t ever invite me to those things at your house again". Just before that I refused to have a plate brought to the back room where I was talking to the great grand mom who also refused to sit or be served. Not a healthy place to be and she gets my son instead of me.
This tells me she realized I meant all the other messages I sent her about ’she had no right to compete with me for my son’s visits on and on, and tell her all the legal stuff I have studied about how Mute Judge Horner’s ’adjudication is’, but she is not very bright and is fearful instead of intelligent about CPS things.
I wonder what she said to ’’Zach’’ and will try to find out just how bad she has been meddling.
I guess it is good to be honored as a Board Member of United Civil Rights Councils of america, that may have been a factor along with my informing her how offensive her actions are when she sends one message to my face and does the exact opposite at all other times and does not ever do anything I ask. I keep reminding her she is not my lawyer, and to never introduce me as her daughter again!
Well she thinks I’m just being mean, but I meant it and so that is not malicious it is reality! I don’t think she gets it yet. I guess I’ll have to pray God change my heart because I think I know myself well enough to know I don’t go around manipulating people just with ’get lost’ messages just to get what I want out of them. I always mean it and don’t ever look back. But, this has been a particularly long and drawn out good-by! She has held me hostage and I have never been able to drop the ax when I wanted it to fall!
I hope she gets arrested for letting my daughter get abused in her ’foster placement’; she let a known drug user move in and get my daughter pregnant! I’m disgusted! I was refusing him entry into my home at all times and Melanie wanted him so she went behind my back while she was under the control of the State and Dolly let him move in. Wow the State is the better parent and only destroys everything they touch!
I’m disgusted!
Can’t wait to see my son!
I hope he has not changed too much - It seems he is interested in his friends more that parents at this point and that is why Zack will let him visit because now Bleu has lost his bond and will - Zack sees he has broken him and that teen age stuff has set in - so he is wiling to risk that I might influence Bleu to stay instead of go home.
I don’t have any way to tell what kind of legal points ere covered but I bet that is all it amounts too. The fact that Melanie told me Bleu did not want to loose his new friend at his new school (again) so he did not want to come home anymore. Isn’t that just sad as all hell! God damn it all to hell that my son would have to settle the matter under such prolonged emotional duress and be put through this while the state sits and waits to grab foster $$$$$$ if we don’t comply to their Nazi bull shit demands on something Judges and Lawyers devised in violation of the Separation of Powers and our right to Privacy and all the CPS wanted was a release of information and had no allegation of a criminal act naming me a perpetrator and them the only victim!
This is sick! I refuse to ay Hail Hitler!!!!!!!!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
What to do!
Love dogettydog who is sick of smelling their pooooooo!
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
From: judgethebench@hotmail.com
To: reformcps@aol.com
CC: dolly.d@---
Subject: Parental Alienation Syndrome ---- Child Abuse
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 00:24:18 -0800
Parental Alienation Syndrome
Category: Nonprofits & Activism
Tags: Parental Alienation Syndrome
============================================
Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)
Category: Nonprofits & Activism
Tags: alec baldwin Fathers Rights children contact custody Parental Alienation Syndrome PAS divorce courts absent dads
Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is the process by which one parent, usually the mother, turns a child against the other parent in disputes regarding custody or access - PLEASE NOTE THIS VIDEO CLIP WAS PRODUCED BEFORE THE INFAMOUS TAPED TELEPHONE MESSAGE FROM MR BALDWIN TO HIS DAUGHTER - Do you think his reaction on the ’phone is the result of years of PAS?
Added: March 02, 2007
============================================
Parent Alienation, fathers rights, child abuse
Added: June 08, 2007
Category: People & Blogs
Tags: Parent Alienation Child abuse Fathers rights
It will be a year this month since I saw my dau...
Added: June 08, 2007
It will be a year this month since I saw my daughter or even talked to her. We had a great father daughter relationship before her hateful mother turned her against me. This is the worst form of child abuse there is. Please pray for me that the truth will be revealed. I miss my daughter very much.......Gary
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
&
LeBaron Family
Thomas LeBaron
Victoria Couvillion
NTBAA
THOMAS LEBARON VICTORIA COUVILLION without Due Process
Marilyn LeBaron
Melanie LeBaron
NTBAA
MARILYN LEBARON MELANIE LEBARON without Due Process
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Watch The Video. Support our Troops... Impeach Treason...
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:48:31 -0500
From: reformcps@aol.com
To:
Sent: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 4:25 am
Subject: Watch The Video. Support our Troops... Impeach Treason...
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html
See: Endorsements 665, 666, and 999
Video To Watch.... Do Not Fall For The, "I’m on YOUR side", lure you in tactic... Those People are Liars and Murderers - Treason knows no bounds...
Watch The Video. Support our Troops... Impeach Treason...
From: Marilyn LeBaron
To: timespresident@sptimes.com
Cc: RE-Polk Judge
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:25:19 PM
Subject: Re: Comments sent from Contact Us
Pursuant to ’No Complaint, No Victim’, I, Salvatore Saccoccio, rescind my signature off the report ----------------presented me by Rock County Sheriffs, _______________, speech given under duress, as I was under threat of prosecution without the presence of Counsel to advise me of the conflict of interest between the team of prosecutors and defense attorneys (The Rock County Sheriffs was acting as both), who assigned themselves to me on both ends of the arguments circumventing my Substantive Due Process rights when acting as judge on both counts. However, I never became WARD OF THE COURT, as they are not Licensed Attorneys even if they got me to wave my and my mother’s Miranda Rights, seeking that which is protected under Parent Child Privilege.
Miranda will be given for you to sign, reserve your
rights on this instrument by not becoming in personam
at Rule 12 (b). Do not give up your personam to "power
of attorney" because you waive rights with each
admission or tacit response answered by "persons
standing in your stead," which makes you in personam
for accepting this "benefit." Remain SILENT and the
reservation will command you to Justice.
Acting as judge and prosecutor is Treason, an Impeachable offense, punishable by death.
I was under duress at the time when I was asked questions regarding waving my rights without understanding that in doing so I was also waiving my mother’s, my privilege, ’rolled over’ by Rock County Sheriffs, made ’to save my own skin’. Thereto, I, Salvatore Saccoccio, to date was not informed of the intended charges against me when questioned, nor am I in receipt of what the purported charges could possibly be. This is misconduct and Rock County Sheriffs simulated Court Room Process when there were no Charges available for them to press since my mother would not give them a statement or allege I have committed a crime against her. Asking me to waive my Miranda Rights is evidence of this Misconduct since a victim in not in need of a defense attorney, Rule 12 (b) does not apply, Rock County Sheriffs cannot represent me.
I was coerced, against my right to Council of Choice as I did not realize Rock County Sheriffs were acting as defense purporting they, as prosecutors, had a case against me. I object to this act of Official Misconduct to be incorporated as an investigative lie as I made spoke without fully understanding, not being Advised of the Premise, while they intended to prosecute my mother.
My Mother and I, we are family, one in the same. Violation of Privilege makes me property of the State of Wisconsin against Supreme Rule that children are property of the parent. If my mother damages her property it is up to me to confer with her for a settlement, which is a Private Family Matter.
My due process rights as the defendant was violated according to the 14th amendment, which Rock County Sheriff are sworn to uphold and defend. I never had an actual prosecutor assigned to the case at the probable cause stage so Rock County Sheriff acted as judge, and assigned them selves to my defense, which does not preclude my rights as a victim as I had no complaint. They did judicial duties at the probable cause stage, where I was the defendant, and they were acting as my prosecutor, which is treason. They threatened to prosecute me. They made me both a victim and a defendant. This is harassment and coercion of a minor without an attorney present or parental attendance. When I had requested my mother to be present they denied me that right, saying I could not see her at the time. They were acting as judge and prosecutor, simulating an investigative process, prior to an arraignment.
I retain my power of attorney on this and assert my right to no complaint no victim. By hereby rescinding my signature off the statement, I made. I assert and demand, request, require, invoke, my right to incommunicado those two cops. I have been adjoined on the wrong side of the action on this matter.
Legal Literacy?
By: AuntyGovern
Marilyn LeBaron
Today, Nov. 15, 2007 at 4:33am
If you are confronted with
explaining what the "UCC 1-207" <---- Now UCC 1-308
does here is your answer.
http://www.landrights.com/UCC_USAGE_INFO.htm
When you are going to sign a contract ( drivers license, lease, buying a automobile, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, devoice decree, or any other document·
BEFORE you sign!!! you have the right to draw a fine line through any thing that is not to your liking. It can be a number, a letter, a word or a group of words. At this time you can add any thing you want in the contract.
Any changes you have made sign your name close to it and date it. A contract is to have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. If not the UCC 1-207 will stop you from giving up your rights on the contract you are about to sign and void out any part of the contract that you have not had the opportunity to view.
Now how the UCC 1-207 works.
After you put UCC 1-207 where your signature is going to be. "your signature" is the last you thing you put on the document_ When you pick up your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your right to change the contract. Here is some more UCC information. You can go to a public law library for more information.
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
Subject: I you have an inclination to ’do something’
instead of watch the rest of ’us’ "Just say, "Yes Massa"
under duress... Here is an Idea... Action needed…
To: mel-bleu-and-me@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:34:08 -0800
From: judgeofpolkaveray@hotmail.com
Subject: Vacation reply
Dear American, (Not to be
confused with Amer-ee-kan )
Miranda will be given for you to sign, reserve your
rights on this instrument by not becoming in personam
at Rule 12 (b). Do not give up your personam to "power
of attorney" because you waive rights with each
admission or tacit response answered by "persons
standing in your stead," which makes you in personam
for accepting this "benefit." Remain SILENT and the
reservation will command you to Justice. e-hem...
Are Court Appointed Attorneys Fully Advised? (Or as Fully Advised as my daughter was when Max R. Wall got a SECOND SET OF DOUBLE CONTINUANCES FROM JUDGE AVERA’S BENCH, Wall stating "Melanie is Fully Advised on the Premise" of the DHS (perjury), he never stating she Advised them, meaning, as it should have been, "DHS is Fully Advised and has forwarded a Premise because Melanie is a witness. But, no, Wall, got the Motive wrong in both directions, but nonetheless became seer, (’prophet’). So, why not Fully Advise my daughter about Law instead?
WHY DON’T WE LEARN what UCC 1-207 is ’in’ public schools.
??Why are we churning out Legally Illiterate caseworkers from colleges??
IT IS ABOUT TIME SOMEBODY DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!
I bet any kid, (IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS) could tell you that Marilyn Monroe did drugs and was a beautiful lesbian who had an adulterous affair with our favorite president. I bet none of those same children, who know about the iniquity of a Moooooovie Star, could tell you JFK wanted to return our Banking system back to the Gold Standard (Lawful Money) and abolish the Federal Reserve Bank ( Legal Tender ) like Ron Paul supporters state he will do if he becomes president.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh (Trade Secret).
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308 <-Formerly UCC 1-207
Body: Action Needed
If you and all who take notice, who being without the need for immediate government assistance, see your fellow men, myself and other parents, bound in that which you care not to see your posterity entrapped or caused to flee from such entanglements, either by contract or breech thereof, so shall ye say.
"This is unconscionable and destructive to find no meaningful end". "I do not consent". "My children do not consent". "My neighbor will not consent".
"The will of the governed, I, my friends, my neighbors, on behalf of our posterity call out to our constituents, to Congress, to our Public Servants, "We are all bound by the same Compact". "Under which we are all equal in the sight of the Law". "So shall the foregoing demand be interpreted:"
"NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS or have Perjury and Prejudice In Place of ’In God We Trust’".
Category: Religion and Philosophy
From: AuntyBLAWGar
http://www.myspace’>myspace.com/auntyblawgwar
Date: Nov 11, 2007 4:18 AM
"The will of the governed, I, my friends, my neighbors, on behalf of our posterity call out to our constituents, to Congress, to our Public Servants, "We are all bound by the same Compact". "Under which we are all equal in the sight of the Law". "So shall the foregoing demand be interpreted:"
"NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS or have Perjury and Prejudice In Place of ’In God We Trust’".
Category: Religion and Philosophy
NOTICE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
This document serves as notice to the court, and all officers of the court, and all other public servants, and all other people and persons that are working for, or on behalf of any public trust corporation, that I know that I have Rights that I can Demand to have protected at all times, both by the court and the police departments who follow its policies. This document serves as notice that I hereby reserve all my rights without prejudice and order all courts and related people and persons to recognize, honor, and protect All My Rights, both today, and forever, as is in accordance with the Constitutions. Furthermore, a Quo Warranto is placed upon all actions that are taken against me that might cause me a legal disability, be it now or at any time in the future.
This is official notice that I Reserve All My Rights Without Prejudice. I refuse this or any other court, public servant or person, the Right to take any liberties with my Rights. I do not consent in any way to have my rights infringed upon. I do not give permission to construe anything I say or do as permission to Prejudice any of my Rights. Any lack of knowledge of the Law on my part at this time relating to My Rights shall not be construed as permission to take any liberties with any of my Rights. Before God, I make and proclaim this statement of My Reservation of Rights as fact and order all public service people and persons to abide by it. Any infringement upon my Rights shall serve as prima facie evidence of Intent to Violate the Law. If any action is taken against me that causes me a disability and it is later determined that said actions, lack thereof, or any part thereof, are based on policy and not Law, this document shall serve as prima facie evidence of intent to willfully violate the Law. Each violation of my Rights shall create a separate claim for damages, which shall be deemed immediately due and payable to the injured party.
The following are two STATE OF OREGON administrative laws relevant to rights violations by public servants.
162.355 Simulating legal process. (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (2) As used in this section: (a) "Civil or criminal process" means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of:
(A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing a person to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) "Person" has the meaning given that term in ORS 161.015, except that in relation to a defendant, "person" means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process is a Class C felony 162.415 Official misconduct in the first degree. (1) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another: (a) The public servant knowingly fails to perform a duty imposed upon the public servant by Law or one clearly inherent in the nature of office; or (b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties. (2) Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor. All officers of the court and peace officers, such as the sheriff and deputies and all municipal private peace officers, such as all people hired for that purpose by a public corporation, such as City and State Police, are deemed to have a duty to know and uphold the law and protect the rights of the people around them.
Any violation of My Rights, or Failure to Stop Another from Violating Them, by a Public Servant Who Has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect Those Rights, Shall Constitute a crime. Such crime shall serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant does intend to, and shall, create claims on behalf of the injured party(s), for damages as follows; 1. $100,000.00 or the maximum allowed by the Administrative Tort Laws of this incorporated State against any applicable performance or security bond the Public Servant is operating under and, 2. $3,500.00 or the maximum amount allowed by the Administrative Laws of this incorporated State in a Small Claims Court. 3. Said Actions Shall Create a Claim for Damages That Can Be Collected by Filing a Suit under the Jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code for Violation of My Common Law Rights, in the Local or Federal courts. 4. It shall also serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servant intends for the injured party to File Deprivation of Rights Suit, Directly in administrative (Federal) Court for the incorporated US Government for further redress of injuries. All claims shall be valid and enforceable simultaneously as allowed by Law.
Authorities that have not been overturned: Norton vs. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 An unconstitutional act is not Law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Owen vs. Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the Law.
Jackson, J., West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette 1943 319 US 624, 638 87L ed 1628, 1638, 63 S Ct 1178, 147 ALR 674 "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." JONES V. COUNCE, 7 F3d 1359 (8th Cir. 1993) BENITEZ V. WOLFF, 985 F3d 662 (2nd Cir. 1993) Qualified immunity defense fails if public officer violates clearly established right, because a reasonably competent official should know Law governing this conduct.
United State vs. Johnson, 76 Federal Register, Supplement 538 Rights are neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his Rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can only be retained by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207.4 "All Rights Reserved" When I use "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207 in connection with my signature, I am saying: "I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement." "The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as "Without Prejudice" (UCC-1-207-.4) or "All Rights Reserved." "the making of a valid Reservation of Right preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel." (UCC 1-207.7)
This Document Is Law, and Must Be Obeyed by Anyone Who has a Public Servant Job, and in Particular, Any and All Public Servants Who Have Taken an Oath to Uphold the Constitutions of this state and the united States but shall not be avoided for lack of an oath.
Further Authorities: Whereas, the exercise of a natural right needs no authority in America other than the Constitution.
Whereas, Art. 1, Sect. 21 of the Constitution for Oregon, "...nor shall any law be passed, the taking effect of which shall be made to depend upon any authority, except as provided in this Constitution;...". Since this is the underlying principle of all American law upon which Accused is standing, the issue of lawful authority over the body and other properties of Accused cannot be ignored.
Whereas, Accused reserves all rights given him by God and protected by the Constitution for the Republican Union, and the republic of Oregon which places definite and unbridgeable limits upon the law making and enforcement abilities of any government body or corporate entity operating in accordance with and under color of American Law.
Whereas, if the STATE OF OREGON decides to mediate or decide the alleged claim against Accused, Accused reserves and exercises his sovereign power to demand that the STATE OF OREGON and JOSEPHINE COUNTY provide full disclosure of the source of the authority upon which all actions were taken. Full disclosure means; absolute in detail from its source.
Whereas, under American Law, the Accused recognizes that codes, rules and statutes are only administrative in nature and are not the actual Constitutional Laws with proper enacting clauses. Such codes, rules, and statutes, as applied as mandatory obligatory conditions to the Accused, in which the Accused is placed under a legal disability over the objections of the Accused, or thru fraud and deception, is an act of slavery.
Whereas, Accused objects to, and reserves the Right not to be subjected to slavery and reserves all Lawful Rights of redress for any act of slavery imposed upon their person and/or other properties.
Further Notice: Whereas, the STATE OF OREGON operates upon some other system of law other than the Constitutional Common Law in which Accused has Rights secure in the Bill of Rights, Accused demands to know the following: (A) Exactly what system of law is the STATE OF OREGON operating under, (B) What system of law is being used to limit the Rights of Accused, if different from (A), (C) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted for violating, if different from (A), (D) What system of law Accused is being prosecuted under, if different from (A), and (E) How that system of law(s) apply to Accused, who understands himself to be a Man with all the Rights given him by God and protected by the Constitutions for the republic of Oregon and the republican union known as the United States.
Accused reminds the court that there is no "half-pregnant" in the law, and that to deny Accused access to the STATE OF OREGON’s and JOSEPHINE COUNTY’s law and thereby access to a defense, wherein an obligation such as a debt or service obligation is forced upon Accused is, in law, an act and declaration of slavery against Accused (42 USC, §1994 "...directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise, are declared null and void.")
Accused further reminds the court that pursuant to law, actors engaged in any form of slavery lose all immunities from criminal prosecution and civil judgments, and any corporation, municipal or otherwise, that condones any act of slavery by any of its agents or employees is subject to civil judgments under the law.
Relief Demanded:
If the court cannot, or will not comply with an American and internationally recognized ’in Law’ and commercial law mandate for full disclosure, then Accused demands the court to dismiss its claim upon its own motion because JOSEPHINE COUNTY, thru its representative, failed to state a claim upon which Accused is obligated to grant relief and further failed to state a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction to grant obligatory relief.
Authority:
The Corporate State is moving in its own name in a criminal action and not Ex Rel on behalf of the People of Oregon under and in accordance with the common law.
In the mid 1990’s, the State of Oregon, Inc., entered into a commercial enterprise with all of the other State of Oregon public corporations, such as the Oregon State Police, the Department of Transportation, SOSCF, etc. in which the retirement accounts/programs known as the Public Employee Retirement System, (PERS), were combined and invested in the stock market in a for-profit commercial enterprise. As a result: (A) The State of Oregon is no longer operating in its lawfully mandated role as a non-profit public corporation. (B) The State of Oregon judges and the State of Oregon District Attorneys, court administrators, clerks, etc. all have an interest in maintaining the same retirement account.
Furthermore:
A percentage of every fine levied in Oregon, by a State of Oregon court, goes directly into the PERS account. As a result, the District Attorneys office and all of the State of Oregon judges, every Oregon State Police officer, SOSCF worker, etc., have a vested interest in assessing fines and using the State of Oregon’s private corporate courts for finding people guilty, as they each acquire personal gain from every conviction.
And Finally:
A percentage of all fines go into the State of Oregon, Inc. general fund upon which the state plans its operating budget, and also, certain administrative agencies, such as the Oregon State Police, get a certain percentage of all fines placed directly into their operating budget.
Therefore:
The State of Oregon is involved in using its courts and jails as tools for an extremely unlawful revenue collection and an undisclosed taxation system.
Accused states that being subjected over his express objections to such a system of codes, rules, statutes and the accompanying enforcement court system is an act of slavery.
Accused again notices everyone that he reserves the God-given and Lawfully protected Right that is endowed upon himself and all Mankind not to be subjected to slavery. Constitution for the united States Art. 3, Sect. 2, Clause 2: "In all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."
By____________________________________
Date:______________________
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Secured Party/Creditor/Holder in Due Course and Authorized Representative for the Debtor/Defendant
RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©
Date:
Subject: In practice, the belligerent claimant in person would never say that his rights were being trampled.
Body: I know you don’t have this memorized yet.
From: mock tried
Date: Oct 18, 2007 9:15 PM
In practice, the belligerent claimant in person would never say that his rights were being trampled. Instead, he would accuse tyranny wherever he found it, and he would take legal action to halt it whenever he had standing to do so. And he would encourage and lend whatever support he could to anyone else who would do the same. He would form alliances and create legal aid societies and funds, and he would network to build a social and voters’ block to be reckoned with, and he would be suing anyone who attempted to coerce him to surrender any of his rights in any way. This would include states and corporations that tried to make him conform to inapplicable legal venues such as privilege taxes and licensing, in order to make him an employee or in the alternative deny him the equal opportunity to make a living. Who will challenge the government’s trespasses against our rights, and thus defend them? Only the belligerent claimant in person! Why? Because in the normal course of things, the only way the average person can challenge a law is to disregard it and get cited or arrested by the police for allegedly "breaking the law". Even if the law is a repugnancy that doesn’t actually exist! And only the belligerent claimant in person is gutsy enough to invite that kind of trouble into his life. Of course, there are things we can do to make it easier for more people to become belligerent claimants in person. More on that later.
by (omitted)
UCC 1-308
You must file a Refute with this HANDBOOK. You must always file a Refute or you lose by Trial of Presumption.
You must send in a NOTICE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS so when facing the Death Penalty in a non-criminal venue so ’they’, CPS, a wolf ’in’ sheep’s clothing, cannot sentence you to the Equivalent of the Death Penalty without a grand jury indictment.
You must also notice that when asked to wave you Miranda Rights you must refuse an Attorney. That way the courts will not have you, subject to Rule 12 (b), a WARD OF THE COURT in the non crime and lots of punishment jurisdiction. (Article I).
Equal Protection of the law is circumvented because Family Law is non-criminal!!!! ... The only real SOS here in Private Family Matters.
Our troops force the ’Gift of War’ upon a foreign nation, and a Foreign Incorporation adheres us, without mercy, to adhesion contracts which circumvent us from our Substantive Due Process rights, naming Family Matters non crime, which is Treason and Court Appointed Attorneys do not defend the issues at law properly!
Melissa Shepherd was told by her Court Appointed Counsel UCC is Criminal Code and not relevant to non criminal matters, but one can reserve their rights without prejudice when entering a Municipal Adhesion Contract ’Agreement’, by way of Mass Duress, but none are Fully Advised to know the full impact of these agreements. Therefore Americans are put to Death, by way of Termination of Parental Rights by prosecutors, aided by hardened judiciary, which is Treason.
Our troops are being murdered when judges ignore the Constitution because Legal Illiteracy regarding Article III jurisdiction, SEARCH WARRANT matters, CPS claiming not to need one, Municipal Police, mostly former soldiers, threatening to kick down doors if people demand their right to presentment. Thereto our troops fight for not, we live for not, and raise our children to follow in their footsteps, put to the slaughter subject to Obedience tactics under Administrative Rule.
sos for your troops. sos for the family.
sos for Greg Pound in Florida who got multiple counts of the Death Penalty for a Third Party act of ’Domestic Violence’, (a dog mothered his infant and resulted in what was called a dog bite), and the law of "for see ability" was ignored to Obedience or Sacrifice, instead of ’Mercy is better than Justice’ being applicable, because non crime and Justice are oil and water, Article I, minus Article III, subject to being interpreted by the right to the Equal Protection of the law.
For a copy of the Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney please go to my websites where indicated.
The Nazi did it, The Communist did it... means to an end...
If you have a Driver’s License, you agree my lack of Reservation of your Rights.
Michigan Equal Parents Rally, State Capitol, Lansing, MI 9/27/06 - Dr. Baskerville, political science professor at Patrick Henry College, describes the totalitarian, kafkaesque nature of the divorce regime which profits from separating children from fit parents.
http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/
Added: January 20, 2008
Category: News & Politics
Tags: divorce, industry, family, court, constitutional, rights, violations, children, destruction, parent, forced, separation, suicide, FFFMF, Separation of Powers, Michigan Equal Parents Rally, Nazi, Hitler,
on MySpaceIM my username is auntyblawgwar
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
Mad at CPS @ aol . com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Anna
Date: Mar 1, 2008 7:40 PM
Hi Marilyn,
I hope you will read this note and contact me. I would love to get back in touch with you.
Love, Anna
From: SPC Brian P Shavers Mom - Determined and
Date: Apr 2, 2008 2:55 AM
You’ll have time with him to heal his wounds, and they WIL heal. Who knows, he may grow up to be a Judge who cares for the rights of children! :)
God love ya!
Dreamer (I like that name, lol)
From: Marilyn
Date: Apr 1, 2008 1:15 PM
Feb 06, 2005 to March 05, 2008 makes three years of isolation control tactics inflicted upon us to wear down my son’s bond with me. That is cruel especially when he put my son on the phone to tell me, "Mom they are sending me home", telling me "The ’family’ had a meeting to see what I really wanted and I told them I wanted to go home", (this meeting took place six minths his suprise Birthday present, ’you have a new home and can’t see your mother anymore’. Bleu was eleven and that is not right especially when they changed their mind the very next day putting Bleu on the phone to tell me, in a sad voice, "Mom, I’m not coming home".
I’ll never forget! I’ll never forgive that animal for such a shameless act of cruelty! He can rot in hell.
Bring Brian & Bleu home! That is all I have to say!
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
Awwwwwww Awwwwwwwwwww AwwwwwOOOOOOOOOOO
From: SPC Brian P Shavers Mom - Determined and
Date: Apr 1, 2008 10:02 AM
Woman! Do you know how happy this makes me! I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! God’s gotcha and he will never let you down. AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:)
I love ya!
pamela
From: Marilyn
Date: Apr 1, 2008 12:59 AM
You are a Dreamer of Good Dreams, and so you shall be named ’Dreamer of Dreams’, and I shall remain ’Stands with Pen’...
Zachariah B. Singleton has relented and I was informed my son will be able to visit me this weekend!
So we shall see what is the future result and if my son will come home now if I move in next door to him. Which was my plan once I found him! lol
*******Hugs* Very Happy Hugs*******
P.S. I just has to tell you first!
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron
10:00 AM
-
4 Comments - 6 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
