The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July

4:33 PM - 2 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

A Nation Under Occupation: the Confederate States of America
Category: News and Politics

A Nation Under Occupation

General Robert E. Lee surrendered his military forces at Appomattox on April 7th, 1865; however, this was only a surrender of Lee's army, not the Government of the Confederate States of America. Most of the CSA Government officials either fled to Europe or Canada; however President Jefferson Davis was captured and held for two years by the Union. NEVER during the entire time of Davis' imprisonment did he surrender the government to the Union. NEVER at any point in time did any member of the Government sign a treaty with the Union, nor did they ever surrender the Government of the CSA.

"That when the people of any one of said rebel States shall have formed a constitution of government in conformity with the Constitution of the United States in all respects, framed by a convention of delegates elected by the male citizens of said State twenty-one years old and upward, of whatever race, color, or previous condition, who have been resident in said State for one year previous to the day of such election, except such as may be disfranchised for participation in the rebellion, or for felony at common law…"

"…and when such constitution shall have been submitted to Congress for examination and approval, and Congress shall have approved the same, and when said State, by a vote of its legislature elected under said constitution, shall have adopted the amendment to the Constitution of the United States, proposed by the Thirty-Ninth Congress, and known as article fourteen, and when said article shall have become a part of the Constitution of the United States, said State shall be declared entitled to representation in Congress, and Senators and Representatives shall be admitted therefrom on their taking the oaths prescribed by law, and then and thereafter the preceding sections of this act shall be inoperative in said State: Provided, That no person excluded from the privilege of holding office by said proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall be eligible to election as a member of the convention to frame a constitution for any of said rebel States, nor shall any such person vote for members of such convention."

Not only did the Congress need to approve the Constitutions, but the States had to be forced to approve the illegal 14th Amendment to the US Constitution before the puppet government was even allowed representation in the Federal Government.

"…I am twenty-one years old; that I have not been disfranchised for participation in any rebellion or civil war against the United States, nor for felony committed against the laws of any State or of the United States; that I have never been a member of any State legislature, nor held any executive or judicial office in any State and afterwards engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof; that I have never taken an oath as a member of Congress of the United States, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, and afterwards engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof; that I will faithfully support the Constitution and obey the laws of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, encourage others so to do, so help me God"

11:09 AM - 15 Comments - 12 Kudos - Add Comment

The NRA is a Fraud! (NRA Endorses Gun Control Democrat; Lies about Ron Paul’s Record)

NRA Endorses Gun Control Democrat, Lies About Ron Paul's Record

Jones Report | November 1, 2006
By Kevin Smith

Any doubt the NRA isn't a shill organization, have now been removed for all to see. The recent B rating given to Dr. Ron Paul (R) TX -14th District, is an outrage. According to the NRA's website as well as his challenger, Rep. Ron Paul's "B" rating indicates past votes for restrictive legislation. This is a blatant lie! When asked for the rating criteria, the NRA said they didn't publish one. According to Penny Langford Freeman, an aide to Congressman Paul, the lowered rating appears to be payback for Congressman Paul's opposition to the NRA's compromise gun locks legislation, which was added to a clean firearms manufacturer's protection bill.

On the other hand, Gun Owners of America, as well as other leading gun rights groups, rate Rep. Paul with an A+. When executive director of GOA, Larry Pratt was informed of what the NRA was doing, he was quick to come to the aide of the Texas congressman.

Larry Pratt went on to relate that from the time Ron Paul got to Congress in 1976 he has been the staunchest of defenders of the 2nd Amendment. From his first days in Congress trying to use a constitutional remedy, the 'One House Veto' to return residents of Washington D.C. their gun rights, to the continual moans of his own Republican party, "Oh here we go again" every time he try's to strike down existing gun laws. Pratt continued "This is a guy who's the real deal", "let's get behind Ron Paul! He's been behind us". When asked how GOA rated the challenger Shane Sklar, Mr. Pratt said "he didn't return the form, which is a very bad sign".

Young Mr. Sklar, whose main battle cry is that the incumbent doesn't bring home enough pork, is out of step, a relic that can't work the system for his constituents. Ignored and irrelevant, is the claim directed at the most principled person in Washington. Congressman Paul's bills are now being recognized by many around the country as necessary to saving this country.

A new wrinkle has been added with the fake ratings by the NRA, now Mr. Sklar has launched a new campaign site emphasizing the fact that he's an avid hunter and fisherman. We all know this line "I support the gun rights of sportsman and hunters", says Mr. Sklar. Versus something that the Statesman, Ron Paul would say, "the Second Amendment is not about hunting or your right to shoot skeet".

We need all men and women who believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, regardless of political affiliations to come to the aid of the last great statesman of the United States of America, veteran, doctor, and scholar; Congressman Ron Paul.

We are in the midst of a detailed investigation into Shane Sklar, he's a registered lobbyist here in Texas. With ethics violations swirling around, his ties to Big Agra and organizations pushing the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) are very troubling; he has all the earmarks of being the corrupt establishment's boy.

Here are a few facts from sources here in Texas:

-Shane Sklar is: He is a registered lobbyist with ethics violations recorded with the TEC

-He has about $150k in personal debt according to his FEC report and he just turned 30 this year.

-Pelosi had a fundraiser for him in DC in July

-He had never been in the military though he says that he is pro military.(he's still young enough to enlist)

-He says that he is a farmer/rancher though he just borrowed money from his mother to invest in his family farm this year.

-His family has ties to oil.

-He is for amnesty(though he says that the illegals need to pay a fine and go to the back of the line, not be deported or prosecuted for breaking the law.)

-He says that he wants more money for farmers, roads, military, but yet wants to balance the budget.

Let's support the GOA instead. They're an organization that actually cares about our natural and God given right to own and bear arms, as recognized by our 2nd Amendment.

11:56 AM - 5 Comments - 8 Kudos - Add Comment

Why the GOP Must Nominate Ron Paul
Current mood: horny
Category: News and Politics

Excellent analysis of the 08 election:

http://www.chattano ogan.com/ articles/ article_114454. asp

Why the GOP Must Nominate Ron Paul
posted October 2, 2007

Why must the Republican Party nominate a 72-year-old grandfather from
the Gulf Coast of Texas, until the past few months little known
outside his district, as its 2008 standard-bearer? Very simple: the
alternative is eight years of President Hillary Clinton. That ought
to be enough to get the attention of every conservative who happens
upon these words, so let me explain.

It should come as no big revelation to anyone inside or outside of
the Republican Party that the GOP has lost touch with its
conservative roots. Massive deficit spending that would make Bill
Clinton or Jimmy Carter blush; foreign adventurism beyond the wildest
dreams of Woodrow Wilson or Teddy Roosevelt; more big government
programs than FDR or LBJ (Google "Medicare expansion" for a massive
example) ... the Republican Party of the early 21st century is
clearly not your father's or grandfather' s GOP.

There are no more Robert Tafts, no more Barry Goldwaters, not even
any more Ronald Reagans (as imperfect as he turned out to be after
reaching the White House) ... except one: Ron Paul. Dr. Paul (an
OB/GYN who has delivered more than 4,000 babies) is the last, best
hope for the GOP to reclaim its once-upon-a- time status as the party
of limited government.

It isn't his status as the leading advocate of limited,
constitutional government that makes Ron Paul a must-nominate for the
GOP, though. It is true that in the long run, the Republican Party
needs him to help it reclaim its spirit, and this indeed will be his
lasting legacy. But, in the short run, the party needs him to win the
2008 election and save the country from another Clinton presidency
that would be far worse than the first. (Unlike Bill, who was
apparently mainly involved in politics to get the attention of the
ladies, Hillary is a true believer in socialism; and, with a
Democratic majority in Congress, she will have an excellent
opportunity to expedite its widespread implementation in America.)

Fact one: Hillary Clinton will win the 2008 Democratic nomination.
She is an experienced, cut-throat politician with deep ties in the
party, and can take Barack Obama down pretty much any time she wants
to. And John Edwards is not serious about pursuing the nomination. He
is just positioning himself to be the VP nominee again, because in
the wake of the 2006 Congressional elections he believes that Hillary
will win the Presidency by taking a few key states where John Kerry
fell short. Long story short: forget the others - Hillary is the
woman to beat in 2008.

Fact two: The 2008 election will be won by the candidate who most
credibly addresses the growing anti-war sentiment that has been
embraced by the majority of the country's voters. (Google "2006 mid-
term elections.) 70% or more of Americans want out of Iraq, and for
many of them, it is the defining issue of the campaign. You may agree
or disagree, but it's a fact and it's going to decide the 2008
Presidential election.

If it comes down to Hillary Clinton vs. any of the "establishment"
Republican candidates, she wins by default. She may have voted for
the war originally, but she will continue to claim that she was
misled by the Republican administration, and that we should trust her
to make things right. (Of course she won't really get us out of the
Middle East mess, but Joe Six-Pack won't figure that out until after
she wins the election.)

If any of the supposed "front runner" Republican candidates (Rudy
Giuliani, Mitt Romney, John McCain, or Fred Thompson) wins the GOP
nomination, Hillary Clinton is essentially a lock. Not only will she
win over a sizable portion of the independent vote with her
(perceived) status as "the anti-war candidate," but - simply put -
the GOP will not turn out its base in sufficient numbers to win.

Nominate Rudy Giuliani? Conservative, red-state voters are not going
to turn out to support a gun-grabbing Northern liberal faux
Republican who dresses in drag and is a charter member of the Wife-Of-
The-Month Club. The social conservatives, along with the fiscal
conservatives and the key swing voters (libertarians and
constitutionalists) will either stay home on Election Day or vote
third party. Rudy won't even carry his home state, and ask Al Gore
how that usually works out. Slam dunk, Hillary wins.

Nominate Mitt Romney? You get basically the same result as Giuliani
without the (bogus) "America's Mayor" 9/11 cachet. Conservatives in
the South and West won't turn out for the former governor
of "Taxachusetts" who has flip-flopped on virtually every issue they
hold dear. The fact that Romney is a Mormon won't help him with the
mainstream Christian base, either. He probably can't win the GOP
nomination, but even if he does, Romney is toast in the general
election.

Nominate John McCain? Not gonna happen. His campaign has taken a nose
dive from which it will be virtually impossible to recover. As of the
end of the second quarter, even (supposed) long-shot Ron Paul had
more cash on hand - and, when the third quarter numbers come in,
McCain will be even further behind in the money game. He probably
won't even be in the top five on the GOP side. Stick a fork in him,
he's done. And even if he could pull off the apparently impossible
and come back to win the Republican nomination, he loses to Hillary
on the war and many domestic issues as well.

Fred Thompson? He's the last hope of those Republicans who are
looking for a "mainstream" candidate to save them from looming,
seemingly inevitable defeat in 2008. On the surface, he appears to
have more of a chance than the previously mentioned "big three."
After all, he has the "actor factor." It worked for Reagan and, more
recently, Arnold Schwarzenegger in California - couldn't it work for
Fred, too? Well, no, not this time around.

Like Ronald Reagan, Fred Thompson is reasonably good at reading a
script. Unlike the Gipper, though, Fred is just awful at speaking
extemporaneously. In case anyone was wondering why Thompson waited so
long to declare his candidacy, it's obvious to those who know
anything about his abilities and liabilities: he wanted to avoid as
many debates as possible.

Like Obama on the Democratic side, Thompson is an empty suit. He
looks reasonably presentable, but sooner or later he has to open his
mouth, and when he does he doesn't say anything of substance. The
less he speaks in public (especially with other candidates around to
rebut him), the better for Fred. Unfortunately for Thompson, while he
has so far been able to duck any direct confrontation with his GOP
rivals, he won't be able to avoid debating Hillary if he wins the
Republican nomination. And about five minutes into the first debate,
with no "Law and Order" writers to put words in his mouth, it will be
over. Game, set, match, Hillary.

When you look at it objectively, there isn't a single one of the "Big
Four" GOP candidates who can beat Hillary Clinton head-to-head. And
none of the "second tier" candidates (Huckabee, Brownback, Hunter,
Tancredo, et al) have stepped up to the challenge. Really, there is
only one remaining viable Republican candidate: You guessed it, Ron
Paul.

Only Ron Paul can take advantage of the Internet the way Howard Dean
did before he imploded four years ago. Indeed, he has already
captured the Internet ... the Ron Paul Revolution is already in full
swing online. It sure was nice of Al Gore to invent the Net for Ron
Paul supporters to take over, wasn't it?

Only Ron Paul can outflank Hillary Clinton both to the left on the
war, and to the right on everything else ... which is the only
winning strategy the Republicans can plausibly employ in 2008.

Only Ron Paul, who is truly pro-family (married to the same woman for
over 50 years, with five children and 18 grandchildren - no "trophy
wives" here) can motivate the socially conservative base to actually
turn out and vote.

Only Ron Paul, who wants to eliminate the IRS (and a host of other
federal agencies) and stop the Federal Reserve from devaluing our
money through runaway, printing-press inflation, can motivate the
fiscally conservative base to cast a GOP ballot in 2008.

Only Ron Paul can keep the Libertarians and Constitution Party
members from splintering off to support their own third-party
nominees rather than another neo-con, Bush clone Republican. (In
fact, the 2004 nominees of the Constitution Party and the Libertarian
Party, Michael Peroutka and Michael Badnarik, have both already
endorsed Ron Paul's candidacy.) While the LP and CP may command only
a small fraction of the overall vote, that may well be enough to turn
the tide in a crucial state or two. Ask Al Gore if he could have used
a few thousand of Ralph Nader's votes in 2000....

Yes, when you look at things objectively, there are only two
candidates who can win the White House in 2008: Hillary Clinton and
Ron Paul. The contrast could not be more stark, nor the results for
the future of America more divergent. If you are a social or fiscal
conservative, a libertarian, a constitutionalist, or just a concerned
independent ... now is the time to consider your options and act
accordingly while there is still time to affect the outcome.

The Ron Paul Revolution has begun.

Joe Dumas
joe@joedumas. com

8:19 AM - 1 Comments - 4 Kudos - Add Comment

Goverment "authorized" ways to celebrate your freedoms this Constitution Day, Sept. 17
Current mood: irritated

By:  John Perna

On Sept. 17, 1787, the U.S. Constitution was signed by thirty-nine brave
men who changed the course of history. Now Constitution Day is a time for
us to continue their legacy and develop habits of citizenship in a new
generation of Americans.

As we go out to celebrate our freedom this Constitution Day Sept. 17,
let's go over a few things to make your celebration a success.

Do not claim that freedom of speech gives you the right to wear a Tee-shirt that the government doesn't like.
They can put you in jail.
If you are a REALLY BIG criminal you will get a Presidential pardon. You will have no such luck if you are just a border patrol agent doing his job.

Tidy up you house before you leave in case it is searched while you are out.
You used to have the right to freedom from search unless a search warrant is issued. Now the police can come into your home, and take whatever they want, and not tell you until 2 weeks later, if they tell you at all.
They don't even have to knock on the door before they barge in.

Don't use any illegal fireworks in your celebration. It is for your own safety. And the founding father's implemented a government to protect you from yourselves. Didn't they? Besides, fireworks are explosive devices and you might be considered a terrorist with weapons of mass destruction. And although the government can't find any in Iraq, you can rest assured they will find them in your car trunk. But don't worry, getting arrested, imprisoned indefinitely without formal charges, and a 5 year wait before the secret tribunal trial per the Patriot Act is a breeze. It's that secret summary execution that should make you nervous.

Make sure you are buckled up in your seat belts, there will be roadblocks and checkpoints to make sure you comply. It is for the children. Have your papers ready as you approach the holiday police checkpoints.

If you are an airline employee, lighten up for the holiday, you can always look for a job tomorrow. Maybe you could transfer over to a Federal Airport Security Screener job.
Big demand for those jobs and you don't have to be smart.

If you are a Haliburton employee, then celebrate:
You probably have a raise coming from the Iraqi contract windfall.

If celebrating on any public property,
make no mention of religious ideals.
Government is a god there.
You will be apprehended.
ALSO, do not hold any religious observances in "your home"
without checking with the zoning administration,
to see if "your home" is properly zoned for church activities.
ALSO by careful not to violate any ordinances against "group assembly".
Do not put up any patriotic signs in front of "your home"
without checking with the zoning administration,
to see if "your home" is properly zoned for billboards.
The term "your home" is used to refer;
not only to homes that are rented on a monthly basis,
from another subject;
but also to homes that are rented on a yearly basis,
directly from the government agent, in the property tax division of your county.
If you make any improvements,
in preparation for your fully government authorized gathering,
make sure that you get permission from the real owner of "your home". The correct government agent, to grant this permission,
will be in the "building permits" section.

Don't criticize the President, or other government officials;
you might be in violation of the Patriot Act and considered a possible terrorist.

Don't mention the Constitution in any district court,
or you could be held in contempt.

If your children get out of line this holiday,
do not discipline them,
or they may be kidnapped by the Dept. of Social Services
and held hostage until you sign a confession,
receive approved psychological therapy,
and are deemed acceptable.

Show compassion this Constitution Day by bringing an illegal immigrant to your celebration, or by hugging a tree.

If an election is occurring in your locality within the next 90 days, do not talk about or publicly support any candidate, as that is no longer lawful. Keep your mouth shut.

If an officer asks to search your vehicle at the "seat belt" checks, do not be belligerent and demand a search warrant.
Standing up for your fourth amendment rights is anti-social and not in tune with the new American way.
Are you with Al Quada or something?

Do not get upset when the searching officer will not help you pick up your belongings that he has strewn all over the highway as he searched your vehicle.
It is not in his job description
and complaining will get you charged with obstructing justice.

Keep your guns at home.
You are not going hunting and besides,
what on earth do guns have to do with Constitution Day?
Better yet, turn your guns into the authorities to let them know that you are a true patriotic American.
You still have the right to carry a gun if you have a license,
but that will soon be gone if the United Nations passes their measure making carrying a gun illegal.

Better yet, just STAY at home.
BUT do not assume that you are safe,
because you are at home.
If a government bureaucrat shows up at "your home",
he will probably be flashing a badge at you.
This makes him look like a constitutional law enforcement officer.
He may even be armed.
Do not ask to see a warrant,
and then tell him to leave if he does not have one.
They will put a siege around your house.
If you do not come out soon enough,
they may invade, with guns drawn,
or even set your house on fire.
For more information, do a Google search using keywords like "Symbionese Liberation Army", "Philadelphia MOVE group", "Gordon Kahl", "The Order", "Robert Matthews", "Covenant of the Sword and Arm of the Lord", "Randy Weaver" , "Branch Davidian", or "Elian Gonzalez".

If you are counting on you congressman to protect you,
understand that the average congressman is ALSO afraid to resist.
For more information, do a Google search using keywords like "George Hansen", "James Traficant" or "Larry McDonald".

You used to have the right to privacy.
Now they have cameras everywhere watching you.
If celebrating at the mall you are probably safe as the mall is now monitored by hundreds of surveillance cameras,
watched by federal security forces.
Don't do anything that you wouldn't want them to see.

Bring lots of cash with you,
there will be many taxes, fines, and fees to pay as you celebrate your freedoms this day. Of course there is an undefined amount of cash that is "too much". If you have more cash on you than someone with a badge thinks you should have, it will make you look like a drug dealer and the cash will be confiscated. Even if you're not charged, you will have to prove your innocence before you see your cash again. In fact, you might have to put up a bond of 120% of what was seized just to get the opportunity to attempt to prove your innocence to get your own cash back. See comments below on "civil forfeiture" laws.

Do not leave home without your driver's license,
social security card, birth certificate, welfare card, Medicare card, medical records, W-2 Form, and two others forms of ID. You may be asked for them at the police checkpoints.
Better yet, get micro-chipped, and avoid the hassle of carrying around your papers. Bring your library card, the FBI may ask you for it. But do not complain. As soon as the "Real ID Act" is fully implemented you will not have all of this inconvenience. You will be required to carry one card that has a magnetic strip storing every bit of your personal and private information.
Of course any state has the right to refuse to comply with the REAL ID Act. However, that state will not receive any highway funding from the federal government, funding in every area will be cut, and residents using the old licenses will not be able to open bank accounts or credit card accounts, obtain loans or mortgages, obtain student loans, attend a public college, apply for food stamps, enter any federal building or courthouse, receive a federal income tax refund, receive social security benefits, or fly on an airplane. Of course you will still be expected to pay the federal income tax that funds all of the above, in order to avoid having "your home", and anything of value found in "your home", sold at public auction.

Do not put any "anti-government" bumper stickers on your car. Especially not anything about the right to keep and bear arms. Police have been trained by the FBI in "bumper sticker profiling".
This attracts their attention at the check points, and makes you look like a terrorist.

With regard to "bumper sticker profiling" you should be especially aware of the fact that "They will get my gun, when they pry it from my cold dead fingers" is no longer mere semantics. At WACO, and at RUBY RIDGE,
we learned that they WILL kill you to take your guns

ALSO, be careful not to have any unauthorized THOUGHTS.
There are now serious penalties for "thought crime".
Be aware that "civil forfeiture" laws make it possible to take anything that you own, by alleging that it was "intended" to be used for the commission of a crime. This could include transporting, or storing, a gun.
If "civil forfeiture" proceedings are initiated against you,
then you will have the burden of proof,
to show that your thoughts were in compliance with government standards.

Get to know some politicians, and bureaucrats, so that you might be able to head off the taking of your private property to be given to private developers for the "public good".

If traveling by air, this Constitution Day,
do not give the airport screeners a hard time.
They are feeling you up, and molesting your daughter, and wife, for the security of America. If you complain you could be arrested. You don't support Bin Laden do you?

Keep an eye on your fellow Americans as you celebrate this Constitution Day Sept. 17. If you see anything suspicious, take notes so that when you get home you can call and report them to the Homeland Security Office.
And remember you are not a nosey snitch, you are a great American Patriot.

Do not mention the signers of the Declaration of Independence this Constitution Day Sept. 17.
Mentioning these white subversive terrorists is not popular and could get you in big trouble.
Besides what do these guys have to do with the Constitution Day anyway?

Do not leave home without one or more little plastic American flags made by political slaves in Communist China.
Make sure you have one flying from the antennae of your vehicle.
You don't want to seem un-American do you?

Do not take a copy of the Declaration of Independence with you as it advocates the overthrow of tyrannical government.
It is a terrorist document and will be confiscated at the holiday police checkpoints.
Same advice for the Constitution.

And remember, as you leave home for your Constitution Day outing, that the second you stepped out of your door that you probably broke hundreds of federal, state, and local laws that you are probably unaware of.
However, if you tow the line, you will not be charged.

If arrested you used to have the right to a jury trial,
and to be told what you have done wrong,
and appointed council.
Now you can be labeled an "enemy combatant" or terrorist,
and be placed in jail with no trial, no lawyer, nothing for as long as they want.
For more information, do a Google search on "Jose Padilla".

Don't even think about taxes on this great day.
The 50 per cent government confiscation of your income at the threat of imprisonment or at the point of a gun should not even cross your mind as you revel in your freedom.
After all, April 15th is a long way off.
With a little effort,
maybe we can get our taxes down to one fourth of our income;
like the amount that the feudal serfs paid to their masters.

And whatever you do, do not let on that you really know that true freedom died a long time ago in America, just have fun for the day and then go home and stick your head back in the sand and pretend America is not becoming a fascist police state.

If you have a few decades with nothing better to do,
study up on "administrative law".
Laws are now made by the unelected bureaucrats,
in hundreds of "administrative agencies".
If you are charged with violating one of these "laws" you will not get a trial by a jury of your peers.
You will be tried by the agency that made the "law" and made the charge against you.
If you appeal this "conviction, " your appeal will also be heard by the administrative agency that "convicted" you.
How likely is it, that they will decide, that they were right?

I hope this message gets past the Department of Home land Insecurity approved internet filter.
How else can they protect us from unauthorized thought?

Now go out and celebrate your freedom,
and have a great Constitution Day!


=====

HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY
This transmission screened prior to receipt by addressee pursuant to applicable sections of the USA PATRIOT Act.

The Patriot Act is constitutionally illegal, but was signed into law takes away your rights and turns them into privileges, which the government can grant or take away at will. If you remember we were told that this would just be temporary. Now it has been made permanent. But no one protested did they?

You used to have the rights to not be spied on by anyone while on the phone or the internet.
You also used to have the rights to your bank records being held private.
Now the government can just go through your bank record data and monitor your financial transactions without question and without even telling you.
------------ ------
Now go out there and celebrate your freedom, and liberty, and have a great sanitized, politically correct, and government approved and authorized Constitution Day!

Do you wish that the government would read the Constitution?

Just email it to a few of your friends.

The snoops, who are reading your emails,

are the ones who need to know what the Constitution says.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free.
Our forefathers are crying.
Our forefathers are angry.
Our forefathers are loading their muskets and heading for The Green.

America..... ...Wake the hell up.

There will be many people coming out to celebrate this Constitution Day when they should be out protesting the rights they have lost. We need to get those rights back.
And for those of you who say
"Why should I care I have done nothing wrong."
This just shows how much you value your rights!
The government loves people like you.
They can take away even more of your rights and you will just go along with them without speaking out.
You deserve to lose your rights because you didn't appreciate them when you did have them.

If any of the above concerns you visit:

www.jbs.org
and
www.thenewamerican. com



Note:
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message.
No baby seals were harmed in the sending of this message.
No whales were harmed in the sending of this message.
The sending of this message did not require testing on animals.
The sending of this message did not damage the environment.

Wishing everyone the best Constitution Day Sept. 17 ever.
Declaration of Independence Facts:

Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed
the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the
British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their
homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the
Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56
fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their
sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine
were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated.
But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well
that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from
the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay
his debts, and died in rags. Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the
British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He
served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding.
His possessions were taken from him,and poverty was his reward.
Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer,
Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Rutledge, and Middleton. At the battle of
Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr, noted that the British General Cornwallis
had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged
General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and
Nelson died bankrupt. Francis Lewis had his home and properties
destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few
months. John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was
dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his
gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in
forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his
children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a
broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution.
These were not wild-eyed, rabble- rousing ruffians. They were
soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they
valued liberty more. Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they
pledged: "For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on
the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each
other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor." They gave you
and me a free and independent America. The history books never told
you a lot about what happened in the Revolutionary War. We didn't
fight just the British.

We were British subjects at that time and we fought our own
government! Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but
we shouldn't. So,take a few minutes while enjoying your Constitution Day Sept. 17
holiday and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for
the price they paid.

Remember: Freedom is never free! I hope you will show your support by
please sending this to as many people as you can. It's time we get
the word out that patriotism is NOT a sin, and the Constitution Day has
more to it than beer, picnics, and baseball games.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom,
go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.
May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."
- Samuel Adams

12:41 PM - 2 Comments - 8 Kudos - Add Comment

Today is a True Patriot’s Birthday: Happy Birthday Ron Paul
Current mood: cheerful
Category: News and Politics

Today is a True Patriot's Birthday

By: Rad'>http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=102429815">Rad Joe

7:28 PM - 2 Comments - 6 Kudos - Add Comment

Fox News Rigs Debate To Savagely Attack Ron Paul
Current mood: pissed off
Category: News and Politics

Prison Planet | May 16, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson

In a sickening display of cronyism and as a consequence of the sheer terror
elicited amongst the establishment after his previous success, Fox News
rigged last night's entire presidential debate in a crass effort to smear
Ron Paul - yet the Texas Congressman still beat Rudy Giuliani in Fox's own
poll.
If you thought the MSNBC debate was somewhat unfair towards Ron Paul, then
this was an absolute debacle.
The audience for the debate was clearly pre-screened and pre-selected to
include only mainly geriatric 75 year old plus Fox News viewers who are
scared of their own shadow. How else can the bizarre applause for
warmongering and torture, which polls show are both clearly opposed by the
majority of American people, be explained?
Guantanamo Bay is uniformly abhorred, even to the point where George W. Bush
himself said he wanted to close it down, and yet Romney is clapped for
saying he would like to double it!

Are these audience members robots or did Fox News dub the audio to include
the applause?
Giuliani clearly endorses torture and the mindless drones in attendance
rapaciously lap it up! Fox News manufactured a fictitious scenario to rig
the debate - the notion that terrorists are about to detonate a nuclear bomb
and that only torture can lead to its discovery.


Host Bit Hume failed to mention the fact that obtaining confessions from
torture is notoriously unreliable because the victim simply tells the
interrogator what he wants to hear, and not necessarily the truth. In fact,
using torture in place of more traditional investigative techniques would
only create false leads, waste more time and put the country in more danger.

Under the Constitution of the United States, which any of these potential
Presidents will have to swear an oath to uphold, evidence obtained from
torture is not admissible in court. In effect, Giuliani, Romney and Tancredo
(who has now completely discredited himself) have promised to violate the
Constitution before they even get into office.

After the show, Hannity and Colmes double-teamed Paul in an attempt to
discredit him in the eyes of both liberals and conservatives, with Colmes
going after him on abortion and Hannity chomping at the bit to smear the
Texas Congressman as weak on terrorism.
This followed a showdown between Giuliani and Paul in which the Texas
Congressman pointed out the fact that U.S. Foreign policy has bred hatred of
America throughout the world, a self-evident truth that is even embraced by
the CIA itself, and was scorned by Giuliani in response.

Despite the fact that Paul was given the more difficult questions and less
time to answer them and was then savagely attacked after he debate, he still
came out on top when the early polling began, eventually finishing a close
second to Romney and easily ahead of Giuliani.
Fox News were obviously desperate to prevent Ron Paul winning the poll
because they restricted it to text message only, no Internet voting, and
closed it down declaring Romney the winner after just three hours.


An MSNBC poll again shows Ron Paul trouncing the other candidates, beating
his nearest contenders hands down in every category.
Fox News anchor Carl Cameron immediately tried to spin Paul's success in the
poll when it became apparent he was winning with 30% of the vote shortly
after 11PM. Cameron roared that Paul had been "slapped down" by Giuliani in
the debate and that his success was merely because his office was unfairly
flood voting - ignoring the fact that McCain had openly told his supporters
to spam the polls on his own website.
ABC News' poll has Ron Paul at 18,500+ votes, with his nearest rivals Romney
and Giuliani barely making it into the 200's. This is an emphatic win for
the Texas Congressman.

Despite the fact that this whole event was a giant orchestrated smear job on behalf of Fox News to eliminate Ron Paul from the race, his message of liberty and real conservatism still resonates with the American people and no amount of vitriol on behalf of Neo-Con Rupert Murdoch and his underlings is going to change that fact.

9:06 PM - 2 Comments - 6 Kudos - Add Comment

A Comparison of all 2008 Presidential Candidates (and why you SHOULD vote for Ron Paul!)
Current mood: ecstatic

Written by Rad Joe