Phoenix

I do alternative health, utilizing foods, Vitamins, Herbs and Spices and Essential Oils and other supplements for health and restoring of vital health and life energies...showing people what type of supplements to buy and how to utilize them to augment there health. Utilizing food as well as these supplements in a complimentary way...to either regain what is lost..or to maintain and encourage better health. check out my blog page....this will have a link to my web page http://tony-rdconsultant.blogspot.com/

independz

Last Updated:
Jun 23, 2008

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 52
Sign: Taurus

City: PHOENIX
State: Arizona
Country: US

Signup Date: 03/02/06

Blog Archive
Older     Newer ]


Thursday, September 04, 2008

A CANCER VID....TAKE A LOOK IT HAS A RISING STAR!!!
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

http://www.youtube.com/user/HerbsPlusBeadWorks


OR GO TO YOUTUBE AND TYPE IN HERBSPLUSAND BEADWORKS


Enjoy the show and share it with whoever you know who may need this data

10:53 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

What A SHOT EH!!
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukQL_CW5nx0


Another profit center for pharma

Gardasil is an immunization against a "disease" that often has no symptoms and usually resolves itself.

Marketers of the vaccine imply it helps prevent cervical cancer. This is scientifically false. Furthermore, cervical cancer is already substantially on the decline.

What is true is that if you introduce Gardasil into a person who already has HPV you dramatically increase their odds of developing pre-cancerous cell behavior.

So why are the marketers of this vaccine working with crooked politicians to make Gardasil injections mandatory for young girls?

It's garbage science and bogus public health all in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

UPDATE

Since publishing this video in the winter of 2008, the predictable public health catastrophe has begun.

Unnamed "federal health officials" reported to the New York Post recently that there have been over 8,000 "adverse events" - including death and paralysis - in girls and women injected with Gardasil.

Let's get some things straight:

1. Gardisil is NOT a vaccine against cervical cancer even though it has been promoted that way by its makers

2. The vaccination series costs $360

3. Some politicians are seeking to make it mandatory for all girls between the ages of 10 and 15.

Another pharmaceutical industry fraud

Thanks to George Bush & Friends, victims of this "vaccine" will not be able to sue the manufacturer. Instead, they will have to apply to the federal government for relief which will involve a prolonged and expensive hearing process.

Some of the injuries reported so far include:

1. A 17-year-old who collapsed and died two days after receiving the last of three injections.

2. An 11-year-old who suffered a heart attack three days after receiving the injection. The doctor attributed the death to a severe allergic reaction.

3. A 13-year-old who developed headaches, lethargy, and paralysis of her left leg days after a Gardasil shot.

Don't let yourself or your daughters be railroaded into receiving this highly suspect "vaccine."

10:32 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Monday, September 01, 2008

The real truth of Vaccinations
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows


The widely-held perception that the influenza vaccination reduces overall mortality risk in the elderly does not withstand careful scrutiny, according to researchers in Alberta. The vaccine does confer protection against specific strains of influenza, but its overall benefit appears to have been exaggerated by a number of observational studies that found a very large reduction in all-cause mortality among elderly patients who had been vaccinated.The study included more than 700 matched elderly subjects, half of whom had taken the vaccine and half of whom had not. After controlling for a wealth of variables that were largely not considered or simply not available in previous studies that reported the mortality benefit, the researchers concluded that any such benefit 'if present at all, was very small and statistically non-significant and may simply be a healthy-user artifact that they were unable to identify.' 'While such a reduction in all-cause mortality would have been impressive, these mortality benefits are likely implausible. Previous studies were likely measuring a benefit not directly attributable to the vaccine itself  but something specific to the individuals who were vaccinated a healthy-user benefit or frailty bias said Dean T. Eurich,Ph.D. clinical epidemiologist and assistant professor at the School of Public Health at the University of Alberta. 'Over the last two decades in the United Sates, even while vaccination rates among the elderly have increased from 15 to 65 percent, there has been no commensurate decrease in hospital admissions or all-cause mortality. Further, only about 10 percent of winter-time deaths in the United States are attributable to influenza, thus to suggest that the vaccine can reduce 50 percent of deaths from all causes is implausible in our opinion.' Dr. Eurich and colleagues hypothesized that if the healthy-user effect was responsible for the mortality benefit associated with influenza vaccination seen in observational studies, there should also be a significant mortality benefit present during the 'off-season'. To determine whether the observed mortality benefits were actually an effect of the flu vaccine, therefore, they analyzed clinical data from records of all six hospitals in the Capital Health region in Alberta. In total, they analyzed data from 704 patients 65 years of age and older who were admitted to the hospital for community-acquired pneumonia during non-flu season, half of whom had been vaccinated, and half of whom had not. Each vaccinated patient was matched to a non-vaccinated patient with similar demographics, medical conditions, functional status, smoking status and current prescription medications. In examining in-hospital mortality, they found that 12 percent of the patients died overall, with a median length of stay of approximately eight days. While analysis with a model similar to that employed by past observational studies indeed showed that patients who were vaccinated were about half as likely to die as unvaccinated patients, a finding consistent with other studies, they found a striking difference after adjusting for detailed clinical information, such as the need for an advanced directive, pneumococcal immunizations, socioeconomic status, as well as sex, smoking, functional status and severity of disease. Controlling for those variables reduced the relative risk of death to a statistically non-significant 19 percent. Further analyses that included more than 3,400 patients from the same cohort did not significantly alter the relative riskThe researchers concluded that there was a difficult to capture healthy-user effect among vaccinated patients. 'The healthy-user effect is seen in what doctors often refer to as their 'good' patients— patients who are well-informed about their health, who exercise regularly, do not smoke or have quit, drink only in moderation, watch what they eat, come in regularly for health maintenance visits and disease screenings, take their medications exactly as prescribed— and quite religiously get vaccinated each year so as to stay healthy. Such attributes are almost impossible to capture in large scale studies using administrative databases,' said principal investigator Sumit Majumdar, M.D., M.P.H., associate professor in the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Alberta.the finding has broad implications For patients People with chronic diseases such as chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immuno-compromised patients, healthcare workers, family members or friends who take care of elderly patients and others with greater exposure or susceptibility to the influenza virus should still be vaccinated  (here is where I think they are out to lunch since there is no validity to the effect that it will prolong life or even work, that the actuall effect maybe as a result of something else in the body, why would you want to be infected with a pathogen that may just make things worse.... look at the previous video ).  'But you also need to take care of yourself. Everyone can reduce their risk by taking simple precautions,' says Dr. Majumdar. 'Wash your hands, avoid sick kids and hospitals during flu season, consider antiviral agents for prophylaxis and tell your doctor as soon as you feel unwell because there is still a chance to decrease symptoms and prevent hospitalization if you get sick— because flu vaccine is not as effective as people have been thinking it is.' For vaccine developers: Previously reported mortality reductions are clearly inflated and erroneousthis may have stifled efforts at developing newer and better vaccines especially for use in the elderly. Efforts directed at 'improving quality of care' are better directed at where the evidence is, such as hand-washing, vaccinating children and vaccinating healthcare workers. Finally, Dr. Majumder said, the findings are a reminder to researchers that 'the healthy-user effect is everywhere you don't want it to be.' The results will appear in the first issue for September of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, a publication of the American Thoracic Society

12:33 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

"Worst coverup in the history of the military", SECRET SHOTS
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj7AN4fRe6s

if you think vaccines are safe ..see what is being done to the military personnel in the USA...and possibly other military personnel in other countries...releasing pandemic properties that would potentiate a series of infections as a result of these personnel being released from the military and normal citizens being infected and released

12:27 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Energized!!!! and it is safe with no side effects...you make it yourself
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

Hi


for those of you who are wanting to be whole and healthy I am doing demo's on youtube...download whatever you need and hopefully you will see improvement or an augmenting of your vital signs and health...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nzeHTpQJhI


there are more on you tube...go to www.youtube.com and then type in herbsplusbeadworks all one word and you will have access to at least 10 vids


To your health!


Tony


 

9:25 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Chart of poisons in the foods you eat....and this effects everyone
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

Here is something to d/l for your information so the next time you go into a store to buy stuff to eat you then can know how to preppare and clean off the toxic poisons that will cause brain damage , faulty digestion, heart and liver failure, respiratory infections, disruptive bowels...and the list goes on....down load this and use this anyway you see fit...

http://www.foodnews.org/fulldataset.php

Test Results: Complete Data Set of Pesticide Contamination

..TR>
 
..DIV>

12:10 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Rank (worst to best)

Commodity

Combined Score

Percentage of Samples Tested with Detectable Pesticides

Percentage of Samples With Two or More Pesticides

Average Number of Pesticides Found on a Sample

Average Amount (in ppm*) of All Pesticides Found

Maximum Number of Pesticides Found on a Single Sample

Number of Pesticides Found on the Commodity in Total

1

Peaches

100

96.6%

86.6%

3.1

1.134

9

42

2

Apples

96

93.6%

82.3%

2.8

0.894

9

50

3

Sweet Bell Peppers

86

81.5%

62.2%

2.4

0.138

11

64

4

Celery

85

94.1%

79.8%

3.0

0.413

9

30

5

Nectarines

84

97.3%

85.3%

3.0

0.576

7

26

6

Strawberries

83

92.3%

69.2%

2.3

0.799

8

38

7

Cherries

75

91.4%

75.8%

2.8

0.290

7

25

8

Lettuce

69

68.2%

44.2%

1.7

0.142

9

57

9

Grapes - Imported

68

84.2%

53.2%

1.8

0.284

8

37

10

Pears

65

86.2%

45.7%

1.6

0.586

6

33

11

Spinach

60

70.0%

31.2%

1.1

1.240

6

24

12

Potatoes

58

81.0%

18.0%

1.0

1.655

4

18

MAKE UP POISON!!!! and your wearing it!!! Prt 1
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Life

Here is some info for all of you be aware that if it is harmul on the outside it will cause damage on the inside...and can stop or imbede normal bodily functions from thought proceses ( causing dementia issues to mental dysfunctions) to organ and tissue damage. So be careful what you have on your skin and be aware as well that the corporates main concern is not being ethical but rather profitable

http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/

About PROPYLENE GLYCOL: Propylene glycol is practically non-toxic when taken orally, i.e. added to food. However, it has been found to provoke skin irritation and sensitization in humans as low as 2% concentration, while the industry review panel recommends cosmetics can contain up to 50% of the substance.

PROPYLENE GLYCOL has reported used in the following product types: facial moisturizer/treatment (849); hair color and bleaching (673); moisturizer (671); anti-aging (533); facial cleanser (444); sunscreen spf 15 and above (431); conditioner (422); styling gel/lotion (366); shampoo (365); body wash/cleanser (344)

 

..TR>

Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)

..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Limited evidence of skin and immune system toxicity

  

CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review), 2006

..TR> Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Limited evidence of respiratory toxicity

products that may be aerosolized (airborne) 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004

show more

 

..TR>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Classified as skin irritant

  

National Library of Medicine HazMap

show more

..TR>

Developmental/reproductive toxicity

Cancer

..TABLE>

One or more animal studies show skin irritation at low doses

  

RTECS®- "Cutaneous Toxicity, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference, 1976," Drill, V 1977

One or more animal studies show skin irritation at low doses

  

RTECS®- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2000

One or more animal studies show skin irritation at moderate doses

  

RTECS®- Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1970

One or more animal studies show skin irritation at moderate doses

  

RTECS®- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2000

..TR> ..TR>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results

  

RTECS®- Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica, Section A, Supplement 1981

show more

..TR> ..TR>

Violations, Restrictions & Warnings

 

..TABLE>

..TABLE>

One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results

  

RTECS®- Food and Chemical Toxicology 1984

..TR> ..TR>

Endocrine disruption

..TABLE>..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Determined safe for use in cosmetics, subject to concentration or use limitations - Safe for use in cosmetics with some qualifications

 

Cosmetic Ingredient Review Assessments

..TR> ..TR>

Neurotoxicity

Enhanced skin absorption

..TABLE>..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

One or more animal studies show endocrine system disruption at high doses

  

RTECS®- Toxic Substance Mechanisms 1995

..TR> ..TR>

Multiple, additive exposure sources

..TABLE>..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Penetration enhancer

  

Cosmetic Ingredient Review Assessments

..TR> ..TR>

Data gaps

..TABLE>..TABLE>

type of concern

product conditions

reference

Designated as safe for general or specific, limited use in food

 

FDA Food Additive Status

Designated as safe for general or specific, limited use in food

 

FDA Everything Added to Food

..TR> ..TR>

type of concern

product conditions