Gender: Female
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 30
Sign: Pisces
City: MEMPHIS
State: TENNESSEE
Country: US
Signup Date:
04/19/06
|
Blog Archive
[ Older
Newer ]
|
|
 |
|
Thursday, April 03, 2008
 |
I can’t think of a post title
It’s been a crazy week. It’s been a REALLY crazy month. (March, and the first few days of April.) I haven’t been answering the phone or even responding to e-mails all the much. So if you’ve tried to get in touch and haven’t heard from me, I’m sorry! I’m back, now, though. I was under a really insane deadline and just couldn’t get away. I did venture out today to pick up a bunch of Final Four Memphis gear. And that’s all I’ll say about the Tigers, because I could easily wind up going on about them for 2 hours. Um, what else? Jennifer Weiner’s new book, Certain Girls, comes out next week. I can’t wait! And Emily Giffin’s Love the One You’re With will be out next month. Also, if you haven’t checked it out yet, I highly recommend The Art of French Kissing by Kristin Harmel. Kristin Harmel is one of my absolute favorite people. She’s so nice, funny, friendly -- and a great writer! I loved her latest book so much, I even blurbed it. That’s all for now.
4:35 PM
-
0 Comments - 0 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Thursday, February 21, 2008
 |
Opening lines
I'm conducting an informal survey of sorts. What kind of "book openings" do you like best? I would be EXTREMELY grateful if you guys could take the time to weigh in on this.
Do you prefer books that start out with:
1.) A line of dialog.
2.) Some kind of "introspective thought." (Example: Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way. –Anna Karenina)
3.) Straightforward description and action. (Example: Robert Langdon awoke slowly. A telephone was ringing in the darkness – a tinny, unfamiliar ring. He fumbled for the bedside lamp and turned it on. – The Da Vinci Code.)
4.) Description WITHOUT action, and without any character introduction. I know this is kind of similar to 3, but I'm thinking of something more along the lines of this example. (A soft fall rain slips down through the trees and the smell of ocean is so strong that it can almost be licked off the air. – The Perfect Storm.)
5.) A character speaking directly to the reader in second person. (Example: So I'll tell you. I'll tell you because confession is supposed to be good for the soul, and when choosing between the tonics available – from religion to Tony Robbins to the friendly late-night chemist – this unburdening seems to present the least risk. – The Last Goodbye.)
6.) Something strange, but intriguing, where you're forced to continue reading past the first sentence or you'll have NO idea what's going on. (It was a bright cold day in April and the clocks were striking thirteen. –1984)
Here's what got me thinking about this: I recently read an article that said most readers prefer "dialog openings" and I'm wondering if that's true. I'm highly interested in your opinions! Also, feel free to expand on this and tell me WHY you like certain book openings better than others. I'm seriously so curious about this.
Thanks!
–Johanna
12:02 AM
-
8 Comments - 13 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
 |
I won’t do this again
 If you don't live in Memphis, or if you don't follow college basketball, then this is going to be the least interesting thing I've ever posted. Still, I couldn't resist. Right now, the great state of Tennessee is in a frenzy over the huge, huge NCAA basketball showdown happening here this weekend.
It's hard to put into words how big this game is. Basically, no. 1 ranked Memphis is going up against no. 2 ranked Tennessee. Factor in that these two teams are bitter rivals, and that Memphis is trying to complete an undefeated season and Tennessee has a chance to ruin that, and you begin to understand the magnitude of this game.
The stakes, and the emotions, are extremely high. And I'm so ready for this game to happen I can't stand it! You see, Memphis if far and away my favorite team. I have loved Memphis basketball since I was a kid. My second favorite team? Tennessee's opponent. Whatever team, whatever day. I don't care. If they're playing Tennessee, they're my new favorite team and I pull for them to win. (And right about now all the UT fans are unfriending me. Don't go, guys! It's nothing personal!)
Anyway, I apologize for indulging my NCAA basketball obsession (although I'm not alone -- the whole city is pretty much crazy about Memphis Tigers basketball). But here's a great article from Sports Illustrated's website about this weekend's game. Enjoy!
Is Tennessee-Memphis the biggest game of the regular season? -- Richard Schulz, Elon, N.C.
Yes, and it's not even close. This season has been kind of a downer when it comes to heavyweight battles between elite teams. The most highly anticipated non-conference showdown until Saturday's Tennessee-Memphis showdown has probably been Memphis-Georgetown, and after a tight first half, that one wasn't all that close. Nor have the most hyped in-league rivalry games been that great. The first North Carolina-Duke game was marred by the absence of Ty Lawson, and while Kansas-Texas was a fun game, it was the only scheduled meeting between the two Big 12 powerhouses all season.
As for No. 1 Memphis and No. 2 Tennessee, they're so far and away the best teams in their respective conferences that their league games have been lacking in the drama department (aside from the near-throwdown between UAB students and Memphis players on Saturday, which is the kind of drama we don't want).
Thank God for Vols-Tigers, which features a host of dynamite storylines: No. 1 vs. No. 2; two hard-driving coaches with big personalities (John Calipari and Bruce Pearl) who don't much like each other; two fan bases in close proximity that like each other even less; and two fun-to-watch teams that have plenty of contrasts and similarities.
How are Memphis and Tennessee similar? Both like to play fast, harassing defense and hope that their depth and conditioning will eventually wear you down. You might recall the last time Pearl's Vols met a team that ran Dribble-Drive Motion was the first round of last year's NCAA tournament, when Tennessee won a hugely entertaining game over Long Beach State, 121-86. (However, you might also recall that Memphis plays much better defense than LBSU.)
How are Memphis and Tennessee different? Well, Memphis has more punch down low, even though Joey Dorsey hasn't been Joey Dorsey of late. And Tennessee has more deadly shooting threats from the outside now that Chris Lofton is back to being Chris Lofton. For me, the big variable (as with any team that faces Memphis) is what kind of defense Pearl chooses to put out there. Pearl has never been a proponent of zone, but zones (and hybrids) are clearly the most effective ways to defend DDM.
I'm going to go with a lukewarm endorsement of Memphis to defend a hair better than the Vols and win on its home court, even though I think Tennessee will end up being more battle-tested for March. What the 'Bag knows for certain is that we've spent far more time in the state of Tennessee this season than in any of our 12 years covering college basketball. We've eaten great barbecue in Memphis (Corky's) and Knoxville (Chandler's Deli), and we've had a blast writing stories on Pearl and on Calipari's offense.
In other words, these are basketball times to remember in the Volunteer State --and not just because of the Volunteers.
1:33 PM
-
2 Comments - 4 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
 |
Random thoughts/update
I think I looked better as a brunette. I probably should have figured that out before I dyed my hair for the 864th time. (I have a small addiction to bleaching my hair.) But I'm not bald yet, so all is good.
This is both the best case scenario, and the worst case scenario, all rolled into one.
If you've e-mailed me, and I haven't written back – I'm sorry. Slight problems, but I think they're fixed now. You should be hearing from me soon.
I got to speak to a journalism class at The University of Memphis today. Yay! It was so much fun…but a little bittersweet because a.) I really miss college. I can't believe I graduated 7 years ago and b.) College freshmen look really, really young which makes me feel really, really old.
I'm chugging along on the new (still untitled) book. It's due to my publisher very, very soon, so that's another reason I've been incommunicado lately.
My tonsils absolutely will be coming out in the not-too-distant future. Surgery sucks, but seeing how I've had strep throat 4 times in 5 months, it's time for drastic measures.
I'm embarrassed to admit how much I'm loving this new Fans vs. Favorite season of Survivor.
Must...finish...book....
4:07 PM
-
3 Comments - 4 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, February 05, 2008
 |
The countdown is ON!
So I turn 30 this year.
Okay, okay I'll come clean: I turn 30 this month. I was totally going to be all sly and vague about it – you know, let people think my birthday was coming up in November or something. But nope, it's in February. The 27th to be exact. So I have about three more weeks until I am officially old.
I realize I'm being super dramatic about this. I'm probably even being kind of annoying. Like last month a friend of mine really irritated me when he droned on and on about what a pain it was to get older.
"Turning 23 sucks," he said. With a straight face. "I'm almost in my…" dramatic pause "mid-twenties!"
I rolled my eyes. Then, for added effect, I threw a straw wrapper at him. I mean, really, who complains about turning 23? Turning 30, that's understandable. Even 25. But 23? (And, as a side note, I'm a little freaked out that I have a friend who is 23. I'm too old to have a friend who's so young, right?)
I have no idea what to expect from this birthday. Part of me thinks I'm going to feel pretty different, but in some ways I bet I'll feel the same.
I was talking to my friend Laura the other day, when I asked her what it felt like to be 30. Laura's birthday was a couple of months ago, so I figured she'd had time to adjust.
"Do you feel like you're 30?" I asked.
She sighed. "Johanna, I feel like I'm 40."
Which wasn't too encouraging.
My friend Brandon turned 31 two days ago, and he's been kind of distraught over it. According to Brandon, 31 is absolutely horrible.
"I feel ten years older than I did last week," he said. "At least when you're 30 you don't feel too ancient, because you used to be 29. But 31 is like a bad joke. Now I'm actually moving into my 30's, which is so much worse. It's like it's finally dawned on me that, as bad as 30 was, I don't even get to stay that age. I'm going to have to be 34 soon, and then 38 and then…oh, God."
I'm glad he stopped there.
I've been trying to console myself with the fact that I've accomplished a lot more than I ever thought I would by 30.
Although, in some areas, I'm kind of lagging behind. I'm not married. I don't own a house. I don't have children.
But I've traveled and I've written books and I'm generally pretty happy with the way my life has turned out.
Also, if this helps, I think I'm a very young 30. I mean, I'm not too wrinkly yet. Plus, I'm pretty immature for my age. (Just last month my friends and I actually prank called someone and pretended to be Simon Cowell. But that's another story for another blog post.)
For now, I'm off to pick up a copy of Lisa Jewell's Thirtynothing. I've never read that book, but I've always wanted to. I just love the title.
But before I go – any suggestions of what I should do for my birthday?
2:39 PM
-
8 Comments - 11 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Monday, January 28, 2008
 |
I have zero self control
I should not be allowed to shop for office supplies. Ever. In fact, they shouldn't even let me in the store. I always go in with the best intentions – I'm only going to walk out with a few pens or a package of printer ink – and I leave with $80 worth of stuff I'll never use.
I think I'm just addicted to organization. Er, I'm addicted to the idea of organization. I'm actually the most disorganized person you'll ever meet. But office supply stores – with all their filing folders and notebooks and dayplanners – make me feel like I'm going to be able to get this scatterbrained thing under control.
I never do.
In fact, shopping for organizational tools actually makes me less organized, because then I just wind up with a big junky pile of notepads and desk organizers and wall calendars. It really is a sickness. It's like the time I bought a $200 pair of tennis shoes – because how could I become a marathon runner unless I had the proper shoes? Or the time I grabbed a hardcover guidebook on glacier tours – for that big Alaskan holiday I was hoping to take. Or the expensive "Italian for Beginners" computer program I picked up last fall, when I was on a quest to learn another language.
Yeah, somebody stop me.
I often get addicted to the idea of something. There are so many things that I love in theory. Like when I see people playing racquetball on TV, I think, Man, that looks like fun. And it's great exercise to boot! I should reserve a racquetball court tomorrow at ..:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />6 a.m. so I can get energized by this vigorous workout first thing in the morning! Then I can shower and change and be at Starbucks by 8 a.m. with my laptop. It'll be the most productive day ever!
Of course, I never do it. I never do most of the stuff I plan on doing. I guess if I had to make a resolution for 2008, it would be to translate more of my ideas into actions. I feel like I'm in my own head a lot of the time, and I don't particularly like that. I need to make big, decisive choices. I need more action, less daydreaming.
And now, one final word about office supplies:
Before I actually got serious about publishing, I used to constantly toy with the idea of completing a book. Every couple of months I'd get on a big "I'm going to finally write my novel!" kick. And the first thing I'd do is hit up Office Max to stock up on supplies.
Don't ask me why. I mean, if there's one thing I've learned it's that you don't need anything fancy to write a book. You just need discipline, really. But back in the day I was convinced I'd never finish a book unless I had the proper supplies. So I'd stock up on piles of notebooks, special pens, highlighters, filing folders, index cards, etc. etc. I don't write longhand. And I never planned to start. So why I thought I needed dozens of notebooks (and I had to have a brand new notebook for each new book idea) is beyond me. I guess I thought I'd carry them around with me and jot down ideas and passages that I would later type up. Somehow that never happened. I just filled the notebooks with bad poetry and history notes and stuff instead.
Anyway, I thought I'd kicked the addiction, but it came crashing back down on me tonight. I stopped at Office Max to pick up a few index cards and I noticed they have this enormous section of spiral notebooks. These things were so awesome and artsy! I grabbed about five of them, plus a couple of packages of pens and some index cards, and some fancy filing folders. I was just about to head over the register when I noticed the price tag on the notebooks: $9.99 a piece. That seemed a little steep. So I bought nothing.
Okay, I'm lying. I actually got a corkboard and a bunch of different-colored index cards. I decided to storyboard the plot of my next book the way directors storyboard movies. I was going to write down all the big "scenes" on index cards and then tack them up on the corkboard. That way I'd be able to see if one storyline was getting too much attention, or if one character wasn't in the book enough. I actually spent about 4 hours tonight working on it. It seemed like time well spent, until I spilled my cappuccino on half the cards, rendering them unreadable. And if that wasn't bad enough, I later realized I could have probably written half a chapter in the amount of time it took to make my weirdo outline.
See, organization never gets me anywhere.
11:12 PM
-
2 Comments - 2 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Sunday, January 20, 2008
 |
Hi, I’m 8
So I was in the car yesterday when I heard a song I really liked. It was very poppy and catchy -- and I had this sinking feeling that I was going to wind up being super embarrassed later on. I mean, there's certain music you just don't want to admit you listen to. Like if you adore a Hanson song. Why would you be proud of that? (For the record, I hate Hanson.) Whenever I hear a catchy song on the radio or in a bar I try to pick out a line from the chorus so I can come home and Google it later on. This is how I discovered that Break Anotha was Blake Lewis. (Yes, I like that song, too.) People, I've reached a new low this time. The catchy pop song I fell in love with yesterday? Wanna know who it was by? Hannah Montana. Yep. Freakin' Hannah Montana. I recounted the story to one of my best friends last night. He grimaced and then said, "You know something, Johanna? It's getting harder and harder to admit that I know you." Come on! It's not that bad. Even if the lyrics are. ("She's just being Miley"?! Okay, this is pretty mortifying.)
2:48 PM
-
11 Comments - 15 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
 |
I’m only joking...unless you’re into it.
I realize I'm coming to this subject about three years too late, but I finally got around to reading He's Just Not That Into You.
And I've got mixed feelings about it.
But first, how I came to read the book: I was at a guy friend's house the other night when I saw it on his kitchen table, and asked if I could borrow it.
"By the way, why in the world do you have this?"
"I need it so I can know what girls expect of me," he said.
"What girls expect of you?" I repeated.
"Yeah. In the past, sometimes I'd ask a girl out and she'd say no. Now I see I wasn't being aggressive enough. If I want her, I've got to pursue her relentlessly or she'll think I don't like her."
Oh, brother. I'd never considered the other side of it, that guys might use He's Just Not That Into You as a "how to get the girl" bible. Which is, I suppose, one of the flaws of the book. There are a couple of others, I think.
Let me start off by saying, I agreed with about 75% of what Greg Behrendt said. And, admittedly, some of it was painful to hear. If he's sending you mixed messages, he's probably not that into you. If he's not calling you back, he's probably not that into you. If he's married to someone else, he's definitely not that into you -- and even if he is, why do you want his ass?
I think my personal favorite was, He's just not that into you if he's NOT having sex with you. Well, duh. If he's coming over three nights a week to watch DVDs and cuddle, yet he won't ever take things to the bedroom, then he's obviously not that into you. He's also probably not that into women, but that's a whole 'nother topic.
My big issue, I guess, is how Behrendt makes things out to be so black and white. The main message is that if a guy wants you, he'll ask you out in a bold, decisive way. He'll move mountains to get to you. He'll track you down and find your number, even if you don't give it to him.
What the book fails to recognize is that some men are shy. Some men aren't comfortable making bold, over-the-top first moves. Hell, some men aren't comfortable making first moves at all.
I've definitely seen lots of guys pull the whole, "So you want go out with me sometime?" number, but do it in a way where it comes across as if they're not being totally serious. You know, like my subject line, that age-old, "I"m only joking...unless you're into it."
A quick sidenote: I have a lot of guy friends. This is a relatively new thing for me. In the past, most of my friends were girls. But for some reason, at this point in time, most of my friends are guys. And I love hanging out with my guy friends, and bugging them for a guy's perspective. One thing I'm starting to realize? Men and women really aren't that different.
I was recently surprised to learn that two of my guy friends -- both of whom are attractive and successful -- had never, ever kissed a girl first. No matter what kind of hints they thought their date might be dropping, they'd always wait it out and let her kiss them.
Another one of my guy friends only just learned how to make the first move. (Or so he thought.) He recently recounted a story about going on a first date with a girl he was really into. They'd been flirting constantly when he finally got up the nerve to ask her out to dinner. She said "yes," and he went in determined to be the aggressor -- he decided that he would kiss her at some point during the evening.
Their date was going great, when she suddenly got up and sat next to him so that their legs were touching. Then she put her hand on his inner thigh. So, without a word spoken, he leaned over and kissed her.
"Isn't that awesome?" he told me, beaming. "I finally made the first move!"
"The first move?" I said, shaking my head. "I don't think so. She's the one who put her hand on your thigh. She made the first move! You made the second move, buddy."
He totally disagreed with me. Weird thing is, when I shared that story with several people, I got really different reactions. All the girls agreed that she made the first move, whereas the guys were kind of mixed. Some of them sided with my guy friend, reasoning that while the girl made a move, the guy made the big move.
Which makes no sense to me at all. I can't imagine too many women would put their hand on a guy's inner thigh just for the hell of it. Typically, if you're making a move like that, you're trying to give him a pretty clear-cut signal. Why would you ever take the risk of groping the inner thigh of a guy you're not interested in?
Another thing: I wonder if He's Just Not That Into You is more valid in certain parts of the country, and less valid in others? I mean, if you're living in New York, where guys are stock brokers and investment bankers and real estate moguls, then, yeah, you expect them to be go-getters. Even your New York baristas and delivery boys are used to a quick, aggressive way of life.
But down here in Memphis, I've seen lots of cases where girls asked guys out, and the guys loved it. Granted, that does seem to the be the exception (I still think most guys love the chase) but it happens more often than you'd think.
I've also heard a couple of men explain reasons they didn't want to ask girls out, even though they were into them. A guy I know recently said:
"I really don't like asking girls out if we work together, or go to church together, or even have a lot of mutual friends. Then, if she rejects me, that makes it really awkward because I can never get away from her. It's much better if I only know her casually, and don't have any big ties to her."
Which was an interesting perspective, and something I'd never considered.
I don't know...what do you all think? Should we take He's Just Not That Into You with a grain of salt, or follow it to a T? Does anyone even still care, since the book came out so long ago?
4:53 PM
-
1 Comments - 2 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Monday, January 07, 2008
 |
What I like about you
Lately, I've been thinking about why we like certain people and dislike others. In theory, we like people because they're nice, or friendly, or because we have stuff in common with them. But that's not always the case. Many, many times that's not the case. I have nothing in common with several of my friends. Our hobbies are different, our political views are different -- in some instances our entire lifestyles are different. Yet, we get along famously. True, it's more fun when you have at least one or two shared interests, but that's not always necessary. Sometimes you just "click" with somebody, despite having very little in common. The same way you often don't click with people, despite having tons of stuff in common. For example, one of my friends used to be obsessed with Dave Matthews Band. She went to tons of concerts, attended lots of fan events. I swear, her whole life was DMB. But she often came away from the gatherings complaining about the other fans. So many of those people got on her nerves and annoyed her. And even when she met other fans she liked, they rarely became friends. She often found that once they'd gone through all the Dave Matthews-related topics they could come up with, their conversations would run out of steam. So if shared hobbies aren't that important, then what makes two people click? I think the big things are: - You never run out of things to talk about. No matter how often you see each other, no matter how many hours you log on the phone, you've still got stuff to say. There are no awkward pauses, no boring conversations. I have several friends like this. We could hang out for two days straight, talking up a storm the whole time -- but then 10 minutes after we part ways I'll think of something else I want to tell them. - You have a million inside jokes. Really, this one is obvious. Who doesn't love hanging around people who make you laugh til you cry? I mean, my friend Laura and I can laugh about absolutely anything. For example, we once had a laugh-til-you-cry-inside-joke about how funny it would be if Kenny G performed an impromptu concert at Burger King. (It would take too long to explain.) We also used to crack ourselves up by putting the words "du jour" behind everything. Like, if we found a great parking spot, it was "parking space du jour." Or if one of us liked a new a guy, he was a "man du jour." (Yes, we are very lame.) My sister and I also have lots of inside jokes -- and we make up all kinds of nicknames for people. (Which I won't post here.) -You want their opinion on everything. Whenever anything new or interesting (or depressing) happens in your life, you immediately contact them to find out what they think. Their opinion truly, genuinely, influences how you live you life. -You're interested in (almost) everything about them. You love hearing about their job, their family -- just their day-to-day experiences in general. No matter what they talk about, even if it's a subject you find boring, they still manage to hold your interest. Like I have one friend who is obsessed with reptiles and amphibians. Normally, I'd be bored to tears by this, but when he talks about searching for snakes and turtles at 2 a.m. behind Wal-Mart, I somehow pay attention. And want to know more. I have another friend who is a sports nut. I find sports (well, except NCAA basketball) so boring. Yet, if he starts telling me about a hockey game he saw, or his football pool at work, I'm entertained. -You can be yourself around them. 'Nuff said. That's sort of a general, albeit fairly obvious, list. And I guess I kind of didn't answer my own question. I sort of described how you can tell when you click with someone, but I didn't answer the why. I guess I'm still not sure. Now, let's quickly go back to the whole "niceness thing." It's weird, because I'm not sure we like people who are nice, as much as we like people who are interesting. Take House, for example. I read an interview with Hugh Laurie recently where they were talking about the challenges of playing a character like Dr. House. It's a tough trick. House is prickly and mean and difficult. There's very little to like about him -- at least on paper. Yet people do like him. I mean, how do you do that? Make a character behave in all these horrible ways, yet still make him loveable? I'm kind of on a tangent here, but the same thing is true in real life. We've all known people who are tough to be around, yet we love spending time with them. People who drive us crazy, but we keep coming back for more. And now, if you can believe it, I've run out of stuff to say. Seriously. I can't think of how to end this post, so I'm just going to go inverted pyramid on you, and trail off. Sorry. I'll try to do better next time.
10:05 PM
-
1 Comments - 4 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
 |
Justin Bartha, you rock my world
Well, not really. But I couldn't think of a better title.
Does anybody even know who Justin Bartha is? I mean, I'm sure you guys are at least vaguely familiar with him. He was in two very popular movies -- he was also in one of the biggest bombs of all time. (Gigli, okay? He was in Gigli. But we won't hold that against him.)
Anyway, in case you weren't aware, Justin Bartha plays Riley, the plucky sidekick in the National Treasure franchise. He's also one of my celebrity crushes. (I have exactly four celebrity crushes. I'll save the other three for later.)
Let's pause, to take a look at him.
Cute, no?
I went to see National Treasure: Book of Secrets today with my mom and sister, hence the Justin Bartha post.
At various points during the film, I would lean over, poke my sister in the side, and hiss, "Hey, hey? Don't you think Riley's cute?"
"No."
"Realllly?"
"No!"
"How can you not think he's cute?"
"Shut up! I'm trying to pay attention."
"But he's got that great dark hair!"
I do love the boys with dark hair. Especially the boys with dark hair and blue eyes, like Justin Bartha.
"And he's so geeky!" I added. "And awkward! Isn't that adorable?"
She sighed. "He looks like Screech. Screech crossed with James Van Der Beek."
Which was a pretty mean thing to say, but I had it coming. I left her alone after that. (Just so you don't think I'm beyond annoying -- my sis and I are always like this with each other. And we were at a matinee in an empty theater, so I wasn't really annoying anybody else. Uh, except for my mom. Oops, didn't think about that. Probably shouldn't annoy my mom on purpose.)
Book of Secrets was pretty good. It's your basic popcorn flick. If you liked the first one, you'll like this.
Biggest thing I took away from it: Nicolas Cage is looking old. And was it just me, or did Nic and Diane Kruger have, like, zero chemistry? This was made even more obvious by the fact that she had tons of chemistry with Justin Bartha. Tons, people, tons! In fact, about halfway through I started wondering if Justin Bartha and Diane Kruger are dating in real life. I mean, their characters kept sitting all close and giggling and flirting.
Not a big fan of that. Something else I'm not a fan of? That random girl who hits on Justin's character at the end. She'd better not be in National Treasure 3.
And I just realized this has been a very "Twelve-Year-Old Schoolgirl" kind of post.
I'll try to write about something a little less cutesy next time.
But, wait! I'm starting to think my sister's right. He does look a little bit like Screech/James Van Der Beek.
Great.
Crush over.
11:17 PM
-
9 Comments - 16 Kudos
- Add Comment
|
|
|