And you thought smoking was bad!!!
Current mood: bored

EFFECT ON HUMAN ENERGY LEVELS

According to a study from the Neurological Hospital of the University of Freiburg in Germany, cellular telephones' high-frequency electromagnetic ?elds lead to a signicant increase in blood pressure. Pulsed high-frequency ?elds, as used with cellular telephones, affect biological processes in the brain, which are measurable in electroencephalograms (EEG). It is beyond question that cellular telephones in?uence the brain's bioelectric activity.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



THERMOGRAPHIC IMAGING

It has been proven that electromagnetic and radio wave radiation affect the human brain and body. Commands originating in the brain can be transmitted incorrectly, resulting in the body's ?awed functioning. Furthermore, this could lead to defective cell metabolism, followed by organ failures. Long-term exposure leads to tissue damage, which could cause a multitude of health problems.

Dr. George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interview


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



HUMAN CELLULAR STUDY

First image shows blood in rouleaux and otherwise much less healthy looking condition after having used an unprotected cell phone for approximately ? ve minutes. When the red blood cells are not free ?oating, delivery of oxygen and nutrients is greatly impaired. This leads to deterioration of health and lack of toxin removal.Second image, next day, shows red blood cells again floating freely, after a Bioprotec chip has been placed on the cell phone and using the phone for ?ve minutes.We need to remember that our bodies are 75% water. Energy waves affect water; therefore EMFs in? uence our bodies and our biochemical commu- nication processes, including our immune systems. This is something to we need to seriously consider when using EMF-emitting devices. Human beings feel well and are healthy when their bodies are in a state of equilibrium. Should this equilibrium be disturbed by external or internal in? uences, various mechanisms that regulate and control the human body are activated to restore balance. Commands for certain bodily functions originate in the brain and are relayed to cells and organs using nerves, hormones, and other means. With the enormous increase of electromagnetic and radio wave radiation emitted by cellular telephones, increasing numbers of illnesses such as allergies, neurodermatitis, decreased productivity, fatigue, asthma, heart disease, brain cancer, depression, sleep disorders and ill tempers are on the rise.


CELL PHONE FAQs
ARE CELL PHONES SAFE?
Yes. Absolutely. As long as they are turned off. Of course, that still leaves the transmissions towers that radiate pulsed microwaves in all directions, 24/7.


CELL PHONE RADIATION
• Leaves phone in spherical pattern, microwaves penetrate skull.
• Dangerous at low power.
• Disrupts critical cellular functions.
• Industry suppressing studies and lying about dangers.
• Criminally inadequate standards - no standards for worst effects.
• Interacts with toxic chemicals in the body, revving up cancer cells.
• Especially dangerous around fetuses, children, and in metal vehicles.
• Effects follow a dose-response curve: more exposure is worse.
• Effects are cumulative and persist for hours after cell phone is turned off.
BLUE SMOG
The big and growing concern is for people and other animals continuously exposed to the "blue smog" of microwave pollution. More than 50 residential and occupational studies have concluded that exposure to electromagnetic fields from cell phone towers promote brain cancer, female and male breast cancer, miscarriages and other serious health maladies.

Leukemia is more common among mobile phone users. When Italian researchers exposed leukemia cancer cells to low-power 900-MHz frequency digital phone towers: after 24 hours' continuous exposure to these low power pulsed microwaves: 20% of leukemia cells were killed. After 48 hours' exposure, these effects reversed, making them replicate ferociously.

Base stations radiate up to 50 Watts per channel in Australia-even more across rural America.

Mice exposed to heating of only 0.17 to 1.05 microwatts per square-centimeter in an "antenna park" ended up with irreversible sterility. The current U.S. exposure standard of 579 microwatts per square centimeter is 500 times higher.

Potentially dangerous radiation occurs in a widening cone of transmission at up to 800 feet from towers rising 150-feet or higher above the ground. The herd-like behavior of cell phone users is dangerous. In Germany, cows grazing under cell phone towers are dying of acute circulatory collapse and bleeding from several organs after microwave antenna installed on a tower formerly used to transmit only non-pulsed television and radio signals.

Humans are antennas too. As upright, ambulatory saline water bags, we attract electromagnetic fields.

Across Britain, Canada and the USA, newly introduced "Picture Phones" featuring picture messaging are already boosting these tower transmitted power levels.

LOW POWER
Like many people, I thought that the new cell phones and cell phone towers radiate at power levels far too low to be dangerous. Current digital phones transmit at a fraction of the power of the first analogue phones. But many clinical studies now show that the damaging effects of cell phones and cell phone relay towers actually increase at low power levels!

Renowned biophysicist and electromagnetic radiation researcher Professor Neil Cherry points to dozens of epidemiological studies showing that chronic low level exposure to pulsed radio frequency/microwave radiation produces increased cancer risk." The Barnett Study commissioned by the Australian government found that low power pulsed microwaves interfere with central nervous system, impair memory function, and result in damage to the eyes.


HOW CAN LOW POWER BE WORSE?
A low-intensity electrical field that can cause a disproportionately large response in much the same way that a low-power strobe light can induce seizures in susceptible people. It's not the amount of energy from the light that provokes the seizure-but rather the regularity of flashing at a frequency that matches or is close to a frequency utilized by the brain itself.

Weak microwaves broadcast by mobile phones can alter several hundred chemicals communicating vital processes in human brain cells.

The problem is all this pulsing. Cell phones jackhammer internal organs and the brain at 217 times every second. It's even worse using the new portables operating at 2.2 GHz or higher. That's an EMR "wind" whipping cells like stalks of wheat back and forth 2.2 million times a second! The wheat will snap. When cells snap, the resulting DNA breaks can cause cancer.

The 1994 "Barnett Report" prepared by Dr. Stan Barnett for the Australian government found that the speediest pathway for cancer promoters to spark cell proliferation occurs when electromagnetic radiation interference with normal cellular control.

Low-level microwaves have also been shown to alter brain, immune and heart activity-which like all cellular metabolism are basically electrical in nature. While you chat on your cell phone, your brain cells are also chattering away in chemical codes as each enzyme exchange pumps life-giving chemistry through the cell at one-tenth-of-a-volt. This subtle electrochemical dialogue also releases calcium and sodium ions that inhibit runaway cell division, and block rogue molecules.

Cell phone radiation increases this calcium efflux, tearing holes in the cell membrane, while every digitized conversation disrupts these vital whisperings between cells. Cell phone microwaves measured at one-tenth British "safety" guidelines emit the frequencies causing the biggest changes in cell calcium levels. Excessive calcium found outside cells following EMR exposure show increased cell growth. Whether or not this leads to cancer is part of cell phone roulette.

In the early 1970s, Australian scientist Dr. Ross Adey traced calcium processes in cells to measure the effects of EMR exposure. Hired by the cell phone industry to defend their products, this leading corporate researcher found that cell phone effects are frequency-dependent.

After 40 years spent looking at how cells communicate with each other using calcium ion flows and tiny electrical impulses, Adey has become a fierce advocate of much lower cell phone radiation standards. Motorola withdrew its funding from Adey, whose laboratory at Loma Linda, California quickly collapsed as a result.


STRANDED
Exposure to pulsed Radio Frequencies produce double strand breaks that are known to lead to cell death. NP Singh and biomedical scientist Dr. Henry Lai at the University of Washington reported finding DNA strand breaks at levels one-fifth of American "safety" limits.

Lai and Singh raised alarms when they repeatedly found double-strand breakages in DNA in live rat brains after just two hours' low-level exposure to both pulsed and older analogue cell phones.
Double-strand breaks, which break both sides of the twisted double-helix ladder in DNA, create serious genetic alterations and can lead to cancer, cell death or mutagenic problems. Brains show fewer DNA breaks during cell phone exposure than brain cells checked four hours after exposure.


MICROWAVES
Microwaves are very short waves of electromagnetic energy that travel through just about everything at 186,282 miles per second. They have been found to "slightly cook" proteins in the blood. Because stress proteins are involved in the progression of a number of diseases, heavy daily cell-phone usage could lead to great incidence of disorders such as Alzheimer's and cancer.

A cell phone typically transmits at 2 to 5 watts. Even at one-ten-thousands of a watt, albumen proteins increase in the brains of half the rats examined. Rat DNA is very close to human DNA.

Swedish neurosurgeon Leif Salford, Dr. James Lin and other researchers have independently confirmed that after two minutes of cell phone exposures, the blood-brain barrier fails, allowing proteins to enter the brain. Once they stray into the brain, proteins that normally behave themselves in the blood could trigger autoimmune diseases such as Fibromyalgia and Multiple Sclerosis.

Damaged nerve cells in the brain can also lead to the dementia associated with Alzheimer's, premature aging, and Parkinson's disease. Medications that under normal circumstances would not be able to penetrate the blood-brain-barrier can also enter the brain during a cell phone conversation and do damage.


HEADACHES
Headaches widely reported among cell phone users indicate microwave-induced leakage of unwanted molecules into the brain. Nitrous Oxide regulates nerve transmissions and arterial flow to the brain. NOx also appears to play a role in Alzheimer's. If something restricts the NOx needed by your brain-headaches result.

Neurologists agree that even non-cell phone users continuously exposed to emissions from cell phones and towers could be at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.


FREQUENCY
Think of frequency as "frequentlies". The higher the frequency, the more cellular DNA is whipped back and forth. When it comes to interfering with living organisms, frequency is more important than power. Cell phones and relay towers transmit on the worst frequencies.

TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) and CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) allow multiple conversations to piggyback on microsecond gaps to share a single channel. Worldwide cell phones use Global System for Mobile Communications: GSM.

Living organisms are very likely sensitive to both the microwave carrier and the lower frequency pulsing of 83.4 Hz TDMA signals from cell phone towers-which correspond to the alpha brain waves of normal consciousness.

Cell phone towers use multiple frequencies to penetrate solid surfaces. The high-frequency 900+ MHz band used by digital cell phones is also very close to the resonant frequency of human DNA, as well as the resonant frequency of the human skull case.

Shouldn't we stop right there?

When you get a plane or enter a hospital and they tell you to turn your cell phone off to protect vital electronic equipment, is the electronic equipment in our heads any less worth protecting?


SAR
Like all radio transmitters, cell phones are government licensed. Cell phone "safety" guidelines are called SAR. The Standard Absorption Rate measures the amount of heating over one square-centimeter of skin.

Because SAR looks only the physical heating of tissues, the resulting "safe" declarations are like saying that smoking won't hurt you if you don't burn yourself!

At the same time, there are no "average" humans. Age, health, gender, body mass, immune function-all matter. And cannot be standardized.

Cell phone microwaves are also amplified, and can morph into unintended frequencies when interacting with aluminum window frames, power lines and wet conditions.

SAR standards average out the power spikes erupting from cell phones. So cell phones that regularly microwave "hot spots" in brain tissue at up to seven-times the average power used for licensing actually "comply" with the much lower limits.

Phones pass or flunk inadequate safety tests depending on how they are held. A phone that really leaks radiation may simply be re-oriented until it passes.

USA SAR is 1.6 Watts/kg for civilians. Anyone working with extremely high-power military radar, radio and microwave transmitters is exempt from these regulations-but not from the effects.

Nothing "safe" about CANADA Safety Code 6: not look at the immune compromised, electrically sensitive, young, females.
Canada's Safe Council funded by Motorola: Safe for industry to make profits.

Many biological effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure occur at induced heating of about 1°C or more.

Memory impairment is showing up in rats exposed to only SAR 0.6-for 45 minutes.

But for a given temperature increase the required SAR value is substantially higher for small animals. Therefore, data from mice underestimates the heating effect in humans.

The much more drastic "non-thermal effects" of mobile phones - including the mass destruction of brain cells - are not regulated at all.

When it comes to covering cell phone liabilities, big insurers are saying, "Forget it." Lloyds and other major underwriters are not buying the SAR safety standards. They refused to cover cell phone liabilities back in 1999.

British government regulators have also refused to give mobile phones a clean bill of health.

Fears about radiation prompted the European Parliament to call for all mobile phones in Europe to carry health warnings.


CLASS B CARCINOGEN
Yet in 1990, the Environmental Protection Agency recommended that magnetic fields be classified as "Class B" carcinogens-along with formaldehyde in carpets and wallpaper, DDT, pulp mill and wood stove dioxins and ubiquitous PCBs.


WINDOWS
Cell phones are licensed for specific power levels and frequencies. But it has recently been discovered that "windows" form when randomly intersecting frequencies resonate unpredictably. When such cell phone harmonics occur, unintended variations in power levels and frequencies often exceed licensed limits.


SYMPTOMS
Powerwatch in the UK receives frequent calls from regular mobile-phone users reporting headaches, loss of concentration, skin tingling or burning or twitching, eye 'tics', very serious short-term memory loss, and buzzing or clicking in the head at night.

Also inexplicable aggression, fatigue, dizziness, agitation, chest pain and shortness of breath - symptoms that were not present before they started using cell phones.

Electromagnetic radiation from cell phones also cause lethargy, and a substantially reduced ability to learn. Widespread apathy and the inability to think coherently often cited as the "dumbing down" of Americans could be the result of EMR pollution.

Residents living around cell phone towers often report the same symptoms. Cellular base stations crank power up and down to adjust to the strength of the signals they receive, radiating energy spiking as high as 240-times.

Reflection from building. Radiation triple wet conditions.

No rights to object environment (health). $250,000 fine CA allowing objections.


BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS ATTRIBUTED CELL PHONES
Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, brain cancer, female and male breast cancer and miscarriages have all been linked to cell phones.

Dr. John Holt reports that once cell damage from cell phones occurs, the damage is irrecoverable and inherited unchanged, from generation to generation.


THE EYES HAVE IT
Even if we close our eyes to cell phone dangers, the watery layer around the iris and retina absorbs cell phone radiation with every call-increasing the chances of contracting eye cancer. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) found that the lens of the eye is acutely sensitive to RF radiation because of its lack of a blood supply and hence limited heat-dissipating capability.

Four-fold eye cancer 1 SAR 2001 Stang.

Glaucoma drugs and cell phones pose special dangers. Application of the glaucoma drug Timolol Maleate reduced the threshold for microwave-induced damage to just 0.26 W/kg.

The frequencies hardest on eyes are in the range of 1-10 GHz.

Every day some 300 million users are activating new 1.9 Gigahertz cell and portable phones.

Besides the eyes, the most vulnerable areas to cell phone heating are the testes.

Dr. John Moulder reports from the Medical College of Wisconsin that besides cataracts, reduced sperm counts are well-documented acute exposure hazards.

Sperm counts already down significantly 1989.

John Holt believes that the disappearance of frogs in remote rainforests where pesticides are never used is being caused by planet-wide "radio wave pollution" interfering with electrically conductive, fertilized eggs spawned on the surface of ponds.

Iridium 66
Global Star 48
10 different satellite communications systems
much lower intensity
deep radar mapping Earth

Sperm counts are decreasing sharply in men for the same reason, he adds.

In Hungary Men who carried a phone with them on stand-by throughout the day had significantly lower sperm concentration. Those who had the phone in use had sperm counts lowered by up to 30 percent after 13 months' exposure.


HOW LONG CAN I TALK ON MY CELL PHONE?
Independent studies have shown that after two-minutes on a cell phone, the blood brain barrier opens - allowing proteins and other toxins in the bloodstream to enter the brain and kill brain cells.
Some researchers say the blood-brain barrier opens within one minute of exposure. So two minutes max, one minute or less is better - and no minutes at all is best. Remember, effects can linger for hours after the phone is shut off.


DRIVING IMPAIRED
Doctors say that the main public health concern should be motor vehicle collisions-not brain tumors, which increase in risk only 30 percent with regular cell phone use.

The risk of crashing your vehicle is 400% greater if you're "on the phone"-or have just completed your call.

Prompted by insurers to look into cell phone hazards, the province of Ontario here in Canada found that heavy mobile users are involved in twice as many fatal road accidents than light users.

That's $4 billion a year in extra claims among cell phone-wielding drivers.

But it's not the distraction of dialing and talking on these phones that's causing so many crashes, the use of handheld cell phones are banned in moving vehicles in more than 45 countries - with notable exceptions of the USA and Canada.

In Australia fines range up to $1,200 per offence.
Studies have found that drivers using phones miss traffic signals and are slow to react. It doesn't matter if the driver is actually holding the cell phone.

The heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to 15-minutes after completing a call.

The chairman of the BC Medical Association's emergency medical services calls using a cell phone in a car it comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk.


HANDS FREE
"Hands-free" mobile speakerphones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units. 600% car accident rate hands-free: Motorola study 1997

The Lancet driving study predicted, "new laws, like one in New York that bans handheld cell phones, won't reduce the risk of accidents."

The British government's decision to remove the health approval on hands-free kits followed a number of investigations showing that hands-free devices channel radiation directly into the users head through the connecting wire.


KIDS CHILDREN, FETUSES
Children and teenagers should not use cell phones period. Their rapidly-dividing cells and the smaller thinner skulls and soft brain tissue of adolescents allow deeper penetration of radiation, while making young children especially susceptible conductors of electromagnetic energy from cell phones - and the cell phone antennas in their schoolyards and neighborhoods.

New Zealand has banned cell phone towers on school grounds. If cell phone towers are considered to dangerous to install near schools, why would they be any safer installed in your neighborhood?

Studies quoted in my report show that children and teens who use cell phones are at high risk for learning disabilities, aggression and early onset of senility.

A decade ago, the Barnett Report in Australia found that fetuses are affected more than their mothers, who should stay away from cell phones and cell phone towers.

Leading medical experts now question whether it is safe for children to use mobile phones at all. Doctors fear that disturbed brain activity in children could lead to psychiatric and behavioral problems or impair learning ability.

MD Gerald Hyland is a mobile phone adviser to the British government. He points to a Swedish study that found children's brains are affected for long periods even after very short-term use. This could affect their mood and ability to learn in the classroom if they have been using a phone during break time, for example.

The cell phone's deep penetration into children's brains could cause kids to lose their ability to concentration and remember-making it impossible to learn.

Cell phone use is also linked with aggressive behavior in kids - who may experience "radical changes" in mood and behavior.

Dr. Michael Klieeisen conducted a famous Spanish study. He says they never expected to see continuing activity in the brain - after turning cell phones off.

He worries that immunity to infection and disease could be altered by interference with chemical balances in the brain. Flus and asthma…


ASTHMA
Everyone knows that if you want to give child asthma, give her dairy products like milk and ice cream. That will do it. Or give them a cell phone.

After the city of Sydney, Australian city went broadband "wireless"-a 25% increase in asthma led researcher Peter Franch to find the production of bronchial spasm-causing histamine to nearly double after exposure to cellular phone frequencies. This disruptive histamine production persists after the phone is shut off.

Franch also found that cellular phone frequencies inhibit our body's cellular response to anti-asthmatic drugs.

Studies conducted in Sydney, Honolulu and twice in the UK all showed significantly higher leukemia rates in people living around transmission towers. The Sydney study found childhood leukemia at more than twice the expected rate.

I have always wanted to visit that spectacular seaside city. Now I wouldn't enter Sydney Australia at gunpoint. It would be like being locked into a room full of smokers.

With inception cell towers across USA 1995 similar spike major cities.

Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of Public Health in New York believes that 30% of all childhood cancers are associated with EMF exposure.

87% of 11- to 16-year-olds in Britain own mobile phones; 40% of them spend 15 minutes or more talking each day on them. In terms of senility, brain cancers and autoimmune diseases-many of these kids will be doomed.

Children 5 to 9 using cell phones increased five-fold since 2000. [Times Jan 12/05]

Since 1996, Professor John Holt has looked at cell phones as a possible cancer culprit. Holt warns that cellular phones permanently damage human cells: "Once the damage is created, the damage is irrecoverable-and inherited unchanged, from generation to generation."

Just carrying cell phones can be dangerous if they're turned on. Once activated to receive calls, cell phones connect every 2 minutes with the nearest relay tower - emitting electromagnetic radiation that can penetrate nearby organs-such as the brain, kidneys, ovaries and testicles, depending on how the activated phone is used and carried.


PORTABLE PHONES
Up the EM spectrum toward visible light, waves become closer and closer - more loaded with energy - more harmful bio systems.

900 Mhz (million cycles/second) analogue much weaker than cell phones.
Less impact than new digital phones. But new Personal Communications Services frequencies 1800 to 1900 MHz bring permissible power densities up another 200%.

New digital cordless 5-6 Gigahertz range (billion cycles second) worse than cellphones.

Corded phones hard to find this side of an antique sale.

.. phone always on in your residence same 2.45 GHz microwave ovens.

Cell Phone Shields
If radiation shields worked 100% and blocked all radiation from your cell phone - it would not be able to transmit. The best tested commercially advertised cell phone shield blocks 61% of electromagnetic radiation coming from the phone.

This is not good enough.

Because when cell phone shields measurably reduce electromagnetic radiation from the phone's transmitter, the phone and/or base station significantly boost their power levels to compensate - largely nullifying the effect and exposing even more passersby to "second-hand" cell phone radiation.

Also people who think they are protected tend to use their cell phones more.

Experts recommend using a cell phone for no more than five minutes per month. Which should handle most emergencies. The best cell phone modification is made with a hammer.

Isn't that a bit over the top?
Are Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, MS or brain cancer over the top?

Who says cell phones are dangerous?
Leading corporate researchers Dr. Ross Adey, Dr. George Carlo, Dr. Michael Repacholi and others have denounced the dangers of cell phones after completing their studies.

The Lancet regularly carries medical studies detailing cell phone health effects.

Government studies in Britain and Australia showing how cellular phones disrupt cellular processes leading to disease have also received coverage in ABC News, Canada's CBC, CBS, The Guardian (London), New York Times, other mass media.

Motorola in the USA and Nokia in Europe are currently leading this "cell phones are perfectly safe" approach. They've hired the world's biggest "damage control" PR firm to present this lie. Burston Marsteller is very good at this, after successfully downplaying the Exxon Valdez, Bhopal and other disasters in the United States.

"The cell phone industry has consistently distorted the medical facts, and colored the public presentation of adverse evidence," Fist snorts. If cell phones are so safe, why are top researchers being persecuted?

WHY THE PERSECUTION OF TOP RESEARCHERS?
If cell phones are so safe, why were the best researchers driven from the field and forced to close their labs after their funding was cut off?

Seattle's Bioelectromagnetic Research Laboratory at the U. of Washington is the oldest, most productive laboratory conducting research into the biomedical aspects of radio exposure. At least, it was. The lab used by Henry Lai and NP Singh will soon close down after losing their government funding.


BE SAFE
Except in true emergencies, always use a landline.

Doctors recommend limiting cell phone use to five minutes a month max.

Lai and Singh of the U. of Washington found that melatonin supplements capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and neutralizing free radicals can counter the effects of cell phone pollution that destroy melatonin-causing the insomnia encountered by many habitual cell phone users.

This does not mean it's safe to use a cell phone if you take melatonin. But it may be helpful to take melatonin after unavoidable exposure.

Cell phones with internal antennas also reduce the phone's electromagnetic emissions. But again, the phone must transmit at higher power levels to compensate-or suffer from reduced range.

Because headsets that convey sound to the earpiece through a wire also deliver microwave radiation directly into your skull, a company has developed an air-filled wireless tube they say, "delivers crystal clear sound" while eliminating the possibility of radiation reaching your head from the headset. But what do you do with the phone?

The danger regarding apparently reduced radiation is that users thinking they are "safe" tend to use their cell phones more-increasing their exposure. The safest modification you can make to your cell phone is with a hammer.


People aren't dropping dead in the streets yet.
Statistical tools invented to identify isolated and acute diseases often miss low-level chronic conditions. Aussie techno writer Stewart Fist thinks it's possible that most modern societies have been suffering the effects of long-term background R/F exposures for a couple of generations. But no one has yet scientifically established the link.

Sudden spikes in death rates in cities like Sydney Australia that that have "gone wireless" indicate big trouble ahead. Peter Franch attributes a 5% increase in death rates in that Australian city to the mass introduction of wireless relay towers.

Given the incubation time of most cancers, we are still a decade away from a sudden and unarguable "spike" in debilitating illnesses-and a possible doubling of already high cancer mortalities-awakens the public to hazards as severe and as long covered-up as smoking.


LEADING RESEARCHERS
Neil Cherry in Christ Church, New Zealand considers the proliferation of cell phones, microwave towers and microwave pollution to be serious contributors to cancer, brain tumors and increasing neurological problems among the human population.

Neurosurgeon Leif Salford says that cell phone users already headed for Alzheimer's or dementia in old age will get these conditions much earlier, while those who would have escaped both maladies are at greater risk of succumbing to them.

Salford's best scenarios show both risk groups having a "significantly diminished" number of working brain cells throughout their lives if they habitually use cell phones or live in the electrosmog produced by microwave transmitting antennas.

Salford and his colleagues at Sweden's prestigious Lund University have published "before and after" images showing a clear link between radiation emitted by mobile phones and brain damage.

Salford adds, "If this effect is transferred to young humans the effects can be terrifying."


GEORGE CARLO
1993 the wireless industry association hired epidemiologist Dr. George Carlo to manage a six-year, $28 million research program looking into cell phone safety. When Dr. Carlo identified and confirmed genetic damage from wireless phone radiation, he did something completely unanticipated by his employers. He told the truth.

Carlo's research concluded cell phone users were twice as likely to suffer from brain cancer and rare tumors than non-users.

He spelled out his findings and concerns to the Chief Executive Officer AT&T Oct 7, 1999. His letter is in my report.

Carlo said severe cell phone risks use appeared to follow a dose-response curve - and the risk of contracting certain tumors more than doubled.

"Alarmingly…the industry has ignored the scientific findings suggesting potential health effects - they have repeatedly and falsely claimed that wireless phones are safe for all consumers including children. I am asking you to help us do the right thing"-in distributing the summary findings. -George L. Carlo PhD.

Another team of Aussie scientists funded by the communications giant Telstra exposed a group of mice to a digitally pulsed cell phone transmitting for two 30-minute periods each day - and also found a doubling of cancer rates. Most mobile phones zap between 10 and 30 times more radiation into the user's head than those Aussie mice were exposed to.


REPACHOLI
Telstra's favorite scientist Dr. Michael Repacholi had previously promoted the safety of cell phones in court cases against base-stations and towers. But Repacholi reversed his polarity in 1999, warning that low levels of non-ionizing radiation can create changes in animal tissue.


DR. STEPHEN CLEARY
Dr. Stephen Cleary World Health Organization researcher made his mark by finding that human brain cells show altered DNA after a single exposure to microwaves-and that such damage is probably cumulative. Cleary is also retiring from further cell phone research due to lack of funding, after being cut off by the cell phone industry's wireless research arm, and by Motorola-the biggest corporation giving grants to compliant scientists.


JERRY PHILLIPS
Dr. Jerry Phillips worked with Ross Adey. He, too, found his funding withdrawn after he published a paper revealing DNA damage at a SAR 0.0024 (1998. Replicated.) Jerry Phillips has now largely withdrawn from further research.

How can corporations sell products known to be so dangerous?
Ask Big Tobacco. Or makers and sellers of rollover-prone SUVs. $40 billion a year in cell phone sales buys a lot of denial.

I'll take my chances. My cell phone is too convenient to give up.
How convenient is cancer?


WHITHER NOW?
Like smoking around children or in public places not personal "right" or decision.
Rights of all affected persons and species.

If present rates of cell phone exposure continue or climb, children, executives and other heavy cell phone users will be culled by an electromagnetic epidemic within a decade. Plummeting perm counts - inability to reproduce = extinction.

Sixth Great Extinction Event now.

Earth's electromagnetic spectrum is part global commons - not corporate preserve.
Not military preserve test new toys on the families they are liberating to death in Iraq.

Yet our airwaves are being auctioned off like real estate.

Fight back!

Insist on precautionary principle - new products must be proven safe before introduction - not proven dangerous after spread through society.

USE BIOPROTEC!!

4:30 PM - 2 Comments - 4 Kudos - Add Comment

I'm working for Greenpeace!
Current mood: peaceful
Category: Life

Today I joined Greenpeace. Today a sweet girl asked me if I would like to join and I told her that I was a fan of their work and that I would be honored to join the good fight. The first donation is $25 and you can choose from $5 and upward for the other monthly contributions. I decided to go with $15. If any of you are interested send me your phone number. She is going to call me and I would like to get others to join. I asked her how many people besides me had also joined and she said two others. That was at 3:30 in the afternoon after she had been outside in the cold for a few hours. That is sad. We had a good conversation about the good things Greenpeace is doing to keep our world clean and safe for future generations. Give up a couple of drinks a month or other unnecessary things and give that money to something that will help the world.

Smile,

Jeffrey

6:15 PM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

I caught a glimpse of a good man today.
Current mood: happy
Category: Life

As a was driving home this afternoon after working out I saw something unusual. I was sitting idle in my car waiting for the light the turn green and I noticed a tattered and whiskered older man, who looked to be a vagabond. He had a cardboard sign in his weathered hands. I have seen many men like this over the years and expected it to read, "NEED MONEY". I was wrong. The sign read, "SMILE," in big and bold letters. As he walked my me I responded to this man's sign. So I looked into his eyes and I flipped the motherfucker off!........What?!....I'm only kidding! I gave him the biggest smile I have ever given someone and it was genuine. It made me think about how life can be hard at times, but all of us have the power within ourselves to choose how we respond to what comes our way. I don't know if other people felt the same way as I did, but he made me have a better day.

SMILE,

Jeffrey    

5:17 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Tag!....You're It!
Current mood: garth... ;p
Category: garth... ;p Life

Tag!.... You're It!

Ok the rules are, once you've been tagged you have to write a blog with 6 weird/things/habits about yourself. In the end you need to list 6 other people to tag and list their names. Don't forget to leave a comment saying "You've been tagged." in their comments and tell them to read your blog.

1- I have been a type I diabetic for 13 years. Not many people know this because I don't usually bring it up.

 2- I have not been in a serious long term relationship because I am very independent and am still finding out who I am. That and I haven't found the right woman for me. 

3- I don't like to be around shallow people. I don't think that anyone is better than me or that I am better than anyone else. 

4- I don't care what a person's ethnic background is. Love you all the same. I have an exotic look and a darker complexion, so people always ask what my heritage is. I don't know much about my dad's side, and I'm dark like him.

5- As a child I never thought about what I wanted to be when I grew up. I just liked to have fun. Occupations are not a natural thing. The industrial revolution has only been going on for a few hundred years.

6- I have been told that I look "gay" or that I'm a "pretty boy". I still don't get how good genes or "facial symmetry" means that you like dick. Also some have told me that I look like I would be an asshole. I would like people to not base their opinions on what they see on the surface, but I also realize that it is in our nature because humankind needed to make quick decisions in order to survive. Our ancestors didn't have the time to analyze things. 

My Six People Are... Scooter, Crystal, Ryan, Heidi, Marv, and Iraz

12:49 PM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

Bless me?

Next time that someone belches or farts, say, "Bless you". Let's start a new trend. Many people say, "Bless you," when someone sneezes, so why not say, "Bless you," when people make other bodily noises. I've heard that the trend originated from the belief that a sneeze was believed to be when the spirit was coming out through the nose. I don't know if this is true. I would have to do some research on it. A fart or belch sounds like the devil is coming out.

2:06 PM - 3 Comments - 3 Kudos - Add Comment

Captain Planet Was Right!
Current mood: angry

I am watching it right now and it's the episode when the red headed guy goes 50 years into the future. The world is devastated from pollution. In one of the scenes there is a massive hurricane caused by global warming. This is what happened with Hurricane Katrina! We need to make a fucking change in the world. We are destroying our planet. It will only get worse if we continue burning fossil fuels. My worst fears have come true. The greed needs to stop. There are alternative power sources that are clean. Wind, water, and solar power are the way to go. We are going to be fucked if we don't change things. This massive hurricane is only a preview of what is going to happen. We need to heal the fucking world before its too late. And if you don't care, well fuck you!

Peace,
Jeffrey

9:19 AM - 7 Comments - 10 Kudos - Add Comment

Crunk?
Current mood: creative

I am always hearing people talk about how they got hella “crunk” over the weekend. Who the hell made up this new word? I blame the damn hopscotch music, or whatever the kids are calling it these days. Some rapper made up a new catch phrase and now everybody and their mother is saying it. I like the word. It sounds cool. I dig it. It is my opinion that it is used in the wrong context. People are using it to say that they got really “drunk”, right? The word “crunk” is going backwards in the alphabet. I have a new list of words to describe the levels of alcohol intoxication. Here they are:

Brunk: A little bit buzzed after the first drink. Feeling relaxed and tingling.

Crunk: Very good buzz. Little tipsy. More courage and saying things you wouldn’t say otherwise.

Drunk: You all know what drunk is like. No explanation.

Frunk: Fucked up! Can’t walk straight, falling over, speech severely impaired. “You are fucking frunk!” Sounds catchy, doesn’t it?

Hrunk: Almost comatose. Passed out on the floor, lying in your own bodily fluids. “Hrunk” sounds like a dog hurling.

I hope you all enjoyed my list of words. Maybe these will catch on if you all start using them.

Peace!

Jeff  

12:37 PM - 4 Comments - 4 Kudos - Add Comment

Watch where you spray...
Current mood: contemplative

Alright, I haven't posted anything in awhile. So I'll write about something that happened to me a little over a week ago. I had just finished painting my grandfather's garage and I was covered in white paint. I looked like I had just got off the set of "Cumshot Deluxe"(so I've been in a porn shop a couple times). I went into the front lawn and hosed myself off, paying particular attention to blasting the paint off of my bare forearms. I wasn't even watching where the spray was going because I was concentrating on getting the paint off. I heard the loud rumble of a big bike and then a loud yell of, "Fuck you, asshole!!!"
I looked up to see the bike come to a screeching stop. This guy was huge, not muscular, but obese. He yelled, "Fuck you!!!" again. I just looked at him and he sped off. A few seconds later he came back speeding from down the road. I didn't know what to expect. Maybe I'd spray him more if he came at me. That would have been a sight. But he then did a u-turn and stopped right in front of me and yelled, "Fuck you!!! You sprayed me, asshole"
I told him calmly, "Sorry, man, it was a total accident. I wasn't looking up."
He then yelled, "Fuck You!!!"
He reved his engine as loud as fuck and peeled out. My cousin, Lee, was working on the car in the driveway and said, "What the hell was up with that fat fuck?"
I just shrugged my shoulders and said, "I sprayed him on accident."
The other day I was walking along that street and I heard the rumble of a few motorcycles coming my way. I jumped into a bush to avoid that guy in case it was him. I will always watch where I spray from now on.

3:24 PM - 5 Comments - 8 Kudos - Add Comment

Violence and hate needs to stop!
Current mood: calm

I am getting sick and tired of the hate and violence in this world. People need to get over their fears and differences and treat each other with respect. The wars and hate crimes need to stop if we are to ever advance as a species and live comfortable and happy lives. Only then will our wounds heal and we can start to reverse the damage that we have caused to our planet through our greed and selfishness.

On Friday, July 1, at around 10 pm, my brother Brian and I were  victims of violent crime. My brother was driving us to Seattle on I-5 when a white Jetta swerved into our lane. My brother had to slam on his brakes to avoid getting into a car accident. We were pissed and Brian honked at them. We continued driving and looked over at the Jetta that was still weaving in and out of traffic. They almost collided with us again and Brian honked again. My brother got off on the Olive Way exit to avoid them. They followed us off the exit and pulled alongside us at Melrose Ave/ Pine Street. I was feeling an adrenaline rush and my whole body was tingling. We rolled our windows down and they rolled down theirs. There were two guys. White guys in their early 20's. They were around 6 foot tall, 185 - 200 lbs, had very short brown hair, goutees and dressed in a thug style. The driver spit into our window onto my shoulder. The driver yelled at us to get out of the car. I had no fear and was tired of these punks thinking they can harrass and scare people, so I got out without a blink of an eye.  It was me against two men. I yelled at the driver for almost running us off the road and was waiting for him to swing at me so I could take him down with an Aikido move or kick out his knee caps. He distracted me while his friend snuck around behind me and hit me directly in the eye.  Seems like they have done this many times before. I only hit him twice before the pain and blood gushing out was too much and I fell over. My brother tackled him and got in a few good hits before they fled and around 20 bystanders came to help us. A few people saw the license plate number and reported it to the police. So many people came to help my brother and me out.  A beautiful woman came to my side as a lay in a bush covering my eye which was gushing blood. She asked me what had happened and was concerned for me. She went into a nearby restaurant and got me some ice for my eye. I never did get her name. I had to wait a half hour for the Police to write their reports before Brian could drive me to Harborview to get stitches for the 1 inch laceration under my right eyebrow and get x rays to make sure that no bones were broken and that my eye had not been damaged. It was a painful experience of having to wait a few hours in the waiting room, puking on the floor of the waiting room while giving my information and the pain of my throbbing eye. We went in around 11 pm and got home at 7 am. 

Today I had the stitches removed and I found out that the slight fracture of the medial orbital wall is healing well. So.... no surgery. I think that good will come out of this. Next time something like that happens I won't get out because they could have had a weapon. I learned the hard way, but maybe they will get what they deserve. I am going back to the scene in a week to go to the clubs and restaurant on Pine and thank the people for being good samaritans. I hate violence and will only fight to defend myself. I am going to get back into martial arts training. The best thing to do is to avoid violence. I was trying to be a hero that day. The true heroes were all of the bystanders who joined together and helped my brother and me. We cannot do it alone, but if we work together we can make a difference. I thank those bystanders, the police and fire department and the great staff at Harborview Medical Center. Something bad happened, and good prevailed.    

Peace,

Jeffrey

5:33 PM - 9 Comments - 12 Kudos - Add Comment

This video made me sick, sad, and angry...

On a serious note, I am posting this. My friend, Jen, posted this as a bulletin on animal cruelty. I love animals and I am against animal cruelty. It was very hard for me to watch this video. I had to look away several times thoughout it. I have a strong stomach and watching this made me feel weezy. I am not endorsing vegetarianism, because I am not one. I try hard to eat only free range  animals that are allowed to grow naturally without hormones and that are killed in more humane ways. Maybe someday I will become a vegetarian. This video has helped me to see the cruel truth that I had heard about years ago, but was never able to fully understand until viewing this. As hard as this may be, I encourage you all to take a look at this video. It will change the way that you think about what you are eating.

Here is the link to copy and paste into your browser:   

http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=mym2002

Peace,

Jeffrey

10:26 PM - 5 Comments - 3 Kudos - Add Comment