History of the World part four

HIV does not cause AIDS. In fact, it does not even make you sick. Almost half of you reading this would test positive for it. Why? Two reasons; 1. it's a harmless retrovirus that most people who have it are born with and 2. when you take an HIV test they are not testing for the virus they are testing for antibodies that your body would produce to contain it. Incidentally, they are the same antibodies your body produces when you have the flu. All the people I know with HIV are alive and well and everyone I know who has died of AIDS never tested positive for HIV. (Those who had HIV before developing AIDS were probably born with it) AIDS is a behavioral blood disease. It is a lymphoma, a cancer. Viruses do not cause cancer. (The current scam is that somehow female genital warts cause cervical cancer. Um, are you freakin' retarded?) A douchebag named DR. Gallo who was deep in debt and the laughing stock of the medical community after 15 years of trying to prove viruses cause cancer came up with this nonsense. So what happened?

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is supposedly a retrovirus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This statement is not only false it is not backed by any scientific proof. HIV does not even classify as a retrovirus by definition since it has never been isolated and it has never been proven that can be spread by any means. Further, in the 100,000+ studies done on AIDS to date there has NEVER been proof that HIV leads to AIDS or that they are even related. In fact, by definition of a retrovirus, HIV may not even exist at all! Yes, you are reading this correctly. The test, we are told, that will tell whether someone is HIV positive and therefore develop AIDS does not even test for the virus itself. It tests for components of the virus antibodies and proteins that we are told are specific only to HIV. This is also FALSE. The first Western Blot test by Robert Gallo tested some 75% of the population as being HIV positive. All he did was lower the sensitivity to target the gay population. He also added hydrocortisone to the list which is found in people who are under stress. There are a number of proteins that are misclassified and all of which can be found in any healthy person in different levels depending on a number of factors. Also, we are told that a T-cell count below 200 is a determining factor for HIV. If you were to take a cross section of the population who do not have any risk for HIV and test their T-cell counts you will find that it ranges from 180-1500. And that is in normal healthy individuals, therefore 200 is at the low end of normal. If HIV were a virus, an infectious disease as we are told it is, it would have spread through the rest of the population certainly by now. Why hasn't it? Because what we are told about HIV and AIDS is a LIE! DEMAND ANSWERS AND QUESTION THE SOURCES! It is unfortunate that we live in a culture in which corporate capitalism is the law of the land. The pharmaceutical industry is calling the shots and they know that they are sitting on an absolute gold mine by spreading disinformation about this and other so, called diseases. Remember, a patient cured, is a customer lost. Follow the money and question those who profit from from it. Robert Gallo is a fraud. His Western Blot Test makes a mockery out of science. His work was NEVER peer reviewed before it was released, and it was later determined that he stole his construct of HIV from French researchers. He has to share the profits from the sales of the so called HIV test as a result. Educate yourself, and be aware of charlatans like Robert Gallo. HIV=AIDS is a LIE. HIV has never been isolated. Robert Gallo is a liar and a fraud. His test for HIV is pure medical malpractice. He should be imprisoned for spreading disinformation and be held accountable for promoting the hysteria he has created over the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. The HIV=AIDS hypothesis is a LIE. Further, out of the 100,000+ studies and reports on AIDS, no one has EVER achieved Retroviral Isolation of HIV.

3:46 PM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

History of the World part three

World War One

When I was in grade school, our history textbooks listed the cause for the US to enter WWI as something called "the Zimmerman Letter". It sounded fake, even to me as a 12 year old. It was a letter allegedly written by the chancellor of Germany to the President of Mexico trying to get them to enter the war on their side. Uh, What??? Mexico?? Are you serious? Germany was winning at that time. Mexico barely had an army and no navy at all. That's just dumb. Not to mention that prior to our decleration of war, the US was very pro-German. So what happened?

World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. So how did that turn out? Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply  facing her and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had begun to loose hope. They lost 600,000 men in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. Meanwhile, not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice.  It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and - I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible. The Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: "Look here, You can still win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany.  You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful.  They [Zionists] told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to the European Jews, as the United States would have had to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain - that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine - should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. 

However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that  the United States, which was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, (Ashkenazim) and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war.  So the German bankers - the German-Jews - Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!"  But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.  

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses.  They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no good. Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionists in London sent word to the United States, to Supreme Court Justice Brandeis for him to go to work on President Wilson. "We're getting from England what we want, go to work on Wilson and get the United States into the war."  And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war.  

Now the war - World War One - in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there because we were railroaded into it, we were suckered into that war so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration that you hear so much about is just as phony as a three dollar bill, just like the so called Zimmerman Letter, which they have since removed from the history books. WWI made WWII inevitable. Are you seeing a pattern develop?

5:01 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

History of the World part two

It’s no secret that because I do not support the established media machine or our joke of a political system that I am typically labeled as an anti-Semite or anti-Zionist. I would also like to add that the political group known as the "Israel Lobby" does not enjoy the unyielding support of a majority of American jews.

I want to make something nice and sparkling clear. I am not any type of anit-culturalist or fringe sepratist. What I am is a free thinking being who is owned and controlled by no person or corperation. I may subscribe to the Khazarian theory but I may also subscribe to the Macedonian/Viking/Crown theory. All of that is semantics. There are only two sides to this universal coin and only two types of people. Which one are you?

4:37 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

History of the World part one

There is no distinction between politics and crime - Roman Emperor Cicero

The higher the monkey climbs, the more he’s exposed - Justin Hinds and the Dominoes

Two of my most contraversial theories are the Scandinavian "hebarau" *(variation of hebrew) and the "Khazarian" theories. The hebarau theory is intensive and incomplete, so lets start with the so called khazar. There is a very logical theory that Eastern European Jews are descendants of a nomadic tribe called Khazars. They were invading barbarians much like the Mongols, Turks and early Hunnish tribes, but whereas the Huns were nomadic hunter-gatherers, Khazars were nomadic raiders similar to the Vikings but less technologically advanced. They would use up the land they inhabited until the resources were gone then they simply move on to conquer elsewhere. They were eventually defeated by the combined forces of Rome, early Russia, and early Germanic (Hunnish) tribes in a huge battle in what is today known as Poland. The survivors were forced to flee south into the Caucus mountains of what is today known as Georgia. They remained there until a mini ice-age forced them to move west. This is why there are many physical similarities between European Jews and Armenians. As they decided to assimilate into Europe, they made a decision to adopt an unorthodox form of Judaism based on the Babylonian Talmud. This was spread by Rabbis who had adopted teachings that were a variation on rabbinic laws of "Jewish Biblical" or "Tanakh" origin (as opposed to "Torah" (the first book of Tanakh) - or the law of Moses, also known as the first six books of the bible). This was probably because the word "Jew" does not appear anywhere in the first six books of the bible. In fact the word does not appear until II Kings 16:6, as a generic term used by the Greeks (translation "Iudeus", meaning Edom) to refer to all of the inhabitants of Judea. The Talmud was based on an oral history of discussion and opinion instead of a chronological study of Theology. From around the 20th century BC these Rabbis were known as "Amorites" or nomadic Semitic tribes who were fleeing southern Mesopotamia from the west.  With the Khazars they saw a great opportunity. A conversion to this Talmudic version of judaism by a gluttonous, parasitic and nomadic culture would promulgate what would be later called "jewish evolutionary strategy"; the concept of a small group conquering, controlling and commanding a large group by means other than force of arms. This group would come to be known as "Ashkenazim" (middle German) meaning German Jew. Their beliefs were in contrast with that of "Sephardic" or Palestinian Jewish philosophy based on the Torah and spread throughout Africa to Spain and as far east as Southeast Asia. (It was also spread by early Christians who could have only been Jews) As the 19th century began, several secret societies formed to try to expose the Talmudic Khazar. One such group in Russia wrote a book called "the Protocols of the Wise men (or Elders) of Zion". It was an attempt to prevent Bolshevism and Social Darwinism, which led to the 20th century decline and near destruction of Russia as the USSR. This book is considered by most modern Jewish scholars to be an anti-Semitic forgery based on an earlier work of fiction. There is only one problem. The predictions in the book have come true almost verbatim. To prove it, do this 3 step exercise then research the topic further.

1 - Who owns your bank? (If your bank is small and independent, they are controlled by the Federal Reserve. Who controls that? 2 - Who owns your favorite media company? (Television, Magazines, etc.) 3 - Who is the US military fighting against and why are they fighting?

I have friends of every ethnicity and culture. I’m not anti-anything. I’m pro-me.

*Important footnote: I feel like the Khazar is as much of a pawn in geopolitical strategy as the sub-saharan African. The real power to corrupt and disrupt lies with the Scandinavian "hebrews" whom we know did not descend from the Huns, Visigoths, Vandals, Saxons, Celtics or Angles. But the was another tribe; a tribe called the "Jutes".  Look into it.

7:24 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part twenty

Just what hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 at 9:03 a.m.? I'm sure that most people have heard what some us so called conspiracy nuts are saying. They point out that when "Flight 175" entered the South Tower no part of it broke off. The argument they make is that because a plane is largely aluminum it should have produced major confetti with its impact against the South Tower's steel exterior.
Then there's the overly-simplistic observation that the damage seen in some photos of the other (North Tower) did not match the footage obtained by the Naudet Brothers. I trust that everyone remembers the Naudet Brothers. Their documentary '911' is an inspiration.
We so called conspiracy nuts also mention that there's no known recording of Flight 175's impact with the South Tower. Oh, we've got the object's deceleration and the explosion covered. But the actual, gut-wrenching sound of a largely-aluminum fuselage making contact with steel at an estimated 450 mph was never revealed to the public by anyone.

Having read these so called "idiotic" theories (no, actually having written some of them) I arrived at Lispenard and Church Streets in New York in the early afternoon of 9/11/04. It is an attractive location; and quite famous. This was where Jules Naudet captured "Flight 11" striking the North Tower three years before. (The Naudets also publish a shot of someone watching the North Tower hit. Not bad considering they were ostensibly videotaping a Fire Chief inspecting a gas leak.)
About a half hour later I am standing on the sidewalk outside of Engine 7 Ladder 1, the firehouse on Duane Street where the Naudet Brothers were shooting their documentary about a rookie firefighter. The Naudets supposedly spent months shooting candid video of the firemen at this firehouse. They are both actually part of a psy-op campagn, although their involvement is accidental as they are as dumb as the moron in the white house that people are mistakenly blaming for all this. 
Upon arriving at ground zero I see people pouring in for the demonstrations which are taking place on the three-year anniversary of the most tragic day in US history. A large number of bikers are riding endlessly around the block, showing the American flags attached to their finely-tuned machines. I ask many people whether they saw the object which struck the South Tower. Since most of the people I speak to are tourists very few answer in the affirmative. Finally I encounter a young, pretty French girl. She tells me she saw Flight 11 strike the North Tower. I ask her a few questions and she is not comfortable answering them. However, she tells me that only when she saw the explosion on the North Tower did she know it was a plane. I interpret her remarks to indicate that she may not have seen Flight 11 at all. (The radio station down the block recorded the unmistakable "whir" of a guided missile)

Soon afterwards I speak to a man who tells me he saw a windowless, gray cargo plane strike the South Tower. This is a typical response for people who were a few blocks away. We talk at length and he makes this point clear several times. (What they saw was a hologram, what was seen on TV was simple 2D animation. The network footage was hijacked and replaced with computer generated animation. That's why people up-close saw no plane, people far away saw no plane, but people a few blocks away saw the hologram and on TV we saw defense department cartoons. It's the same technology they put into your automobiles navigation system.) I talk to another man who tells me he saw a commercial jet strike the South Tower. I ask him a couple of questions about what it looked like and he quickly gets frustrated and terminates the conversation. I try to talk to a couple of other eyewitnesses but they won't talk to me. I then hail a cab and head uptown for the Grand Ballroom event.
In the cab I come to the conclusion that someone other than Osama bin Laden sent the diversionary hologram of  a grey cargo plane into the South Tower. Meanwhile, the TV networks aired video of a Hindenberg disaster. 911 was actually a news media hoax, a monumental PsyOps campaign that was inflicted upon the Human Race by the corporate US media. (Which is owned and controlled by those people I can't talk about.)

7:40 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part nineteen

I am not ususally on a soapbox, but I feel that events are accelerating. Here are some of my theories for the record:

The advent of artificial intellegence is much closer than previously believed. The online revolution is adding fuel to a fire which is about to burn out of control. We have already been moved to a cashless society, the next step will be electronic identification, (a card with ID, bank info, medical and criminal history, etc.) then an implanted chip (already being used on pets) followed by artificial selection (thinning out the human species, currenty underway in the third world) the elimination of printed materials to be replaced by the internet and widespead elimination of humans (launching warheads, poisoning the water supply, etc.)

The seeds of deception and lies which resulted in an undeclared war against our society were planted in the summer of 2000. The so called "election" was the testing ground for an even bigger travesty that would come the next summer. You can get into as many arguments as you want about the phoney war on terror, supposed terrorists, sending people to die in central asia to "defend our freedom", and the never-ending Israeli question, but you cant escape the physical evidence or the common sense of independent thinkers;

9/11- plane crashes without the planes (have you ever heard of a car crash without the car?)  A hole in the ground in PA. and a whole bunch of nothing at the pentagon.                                                                                     

9/11- three intentionally and professionally demolished buildings (WTC 7 was just a slap in the face) The pyroclastic flow occurred from the heat produced by thermite charges ( possibly set off by a microwave weapon of some type)                                                                    

9/11- two of the four supposedly hijacked planes execute 180 degree turns and find their respective targets without any help from air traffic conrtol; even though the alleged hijackers had never flown an airliner before, even though they weighed 100 pounds each and were able to overpower former special forces pilots with plastic knives (it was later changed to box cutters when they realized even some americans aren't that dumb), even though deactivation of a transponder would still not make them invisable to radar, even though it went against every avaition rule and policy we have, even though the pentagon has the most guarded air space in the world,  even though the FBI claimed to have no prior knowledge of this supposed "plot" yet within 24 hours they knew every detail, even though aluminum aircraft cannot penetrate steel and concrete at any speed, that seems believable to you. I'm sorry, you're just an idiot if you believe that.                                                    

Election 2000- guess what, there is no popular vote for president. The electors that represent the voting system are not even required by law to vote for whomever carries their state. In fact they are not legally required to vote at all. (Rutherfor B. Hayes lost his election by a landslide, yet he was still sworn in as president)                                                            

War in Iraq- I have yet to hear a logical explanation for this. All I have heard is "war on terror" or "defending freedom". Not only can anyone not fully define this, they cannont seem to make a connection with Iraq. I defend my freedom by confronting the assholes that stripped the constitution and struck down two amendments that secured said freedom.                        

9/11- If no one knew where the supposed  hijacked planes were headed why did bush keep chilling in the florida classroom until it was time to give his regularly scheduled address? His location was public information. Someone knew there was not a plane headed for florida. (Bush was holding the pet goat book upside down)                                                                               

9/11- the footage of palestinians celebrating in the streets on 9/11 was fake. It would have been close to seven PM in palestine when that footage aired, yet the sun was at high noon, as it was here in the US (on a soundstage in Burbank) 

Fake Moon Landing- Speaking of Burbank, can any of you egghead intellectuals explain why the space shuttle crew was seriously effected by radiation from the middle rings of the van allen belt while several hundred miles below it, yet the lying ass apollo douchebags seem to shoot straight through it twice on each trip in that cracker-box of a capsule that had technology equivelent to a $10 wal-mart watch without getting so much as a headache?                                           

War in Lebanon- Isamic fundamentalism was created by the western elite (mostly wall street bankers) as were the viet cong, the rise of the nazis, south american drug cartels and so called communism (social darwinism). The holy Quran denounces violence and condemns negative behavior. The Babylonian Talmud embraced by some so called European Jews encourages warfare, violence, hegemony, racism and supremecy.                                                      

War on Terror- Every CIA director was a former wall street executive. (Wall street financed the nazi war machine in the 30's.) No one is flipping sides because it was always the same side. Fascism and communism are parts in the same engine, as are democrats and republicans. They are a means to an end. Your enslavement to idealism proceeds from a false assumption; That somehow a group of men were placed in a position of athority over other men. 

Mel Gibson- I don't know what he said and I don't really give a damn. I do know that collectievly, mohammed, ghandi, buhdda and jimmy carter are more christianlike than 80 percent of people who consider themselves christian. If you are not a pacifist, you are not a christian. Nowhere in the teachings of christ does it state that war or violence is necessary or justified. In fact he says the opposite, that you should love and pray for your enemies, and treat others in the way you would expect treatment and to do good things so that good things will happen to you (karma). He also mentions that is will be difficult if not impossible to experience a life beyond that which we have now if we do not do these things. Makes sense, doesn't it?

A woman recently asked me why I was calling her son (who was fighting in the middle east) a non-Christian. I told her that he may be a good man, a good person, a great son but definately not a Christian. There is a WORLD of difference between defending your family and your home and flying halfway across the world to kill people that have nothing to do with anything. Honor in ignorance is an existential question. Let me deal with that.

"Shock and Awe" are no different than "Smash and Grab". Stand up to them now or become slaves forever.

                         Skip Pulley

5:15 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part eighteen

Points to ponder about the second World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.

1. Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said, "There is such a taboo on suicide in Islam, it is completely prohibited in Islam, that we find it inconceivable that somebody would invoke the name of God and then commit some act that is totally opposed to the faith."

2. The video of Palistinians in the streets celebrating news of the attacks was made at around noon according to visible shadows. At the time the video was shot it had to have been near or after sunset in that part of the world. Therefore the video could not have been shot on the day or at the time claimed.

3. Devout Muslims who would be willing to sacrifice themselves for their cause do not frequent bars and do not ever drink alchoholic beverages.

4. A devout Muslim would not take a copy of his holy book the Quran to a bar and leave it behind when he left after spending an evening drinking, participating in lapdances, and bragging about pending bloodshed to take place the following day. Who is so stupid that they would believe this?

5. Men who have been so careful during 5 years of planning, training, and careful preparations that never allowed even one leak do not brag the night before their mission that they are going to cause violence and bloodshed the following day, using credit cards with their correct names, allowing drivers licenses with photos to be xeroxed, nor do they spread incriminating evidence around like popcorn.

6. A devout Muslim on the way to his death would not leave his holy Quran in a parked car. He would take it with him.

7. According to news accounts the perpetrators planned the attack as long ago as 5 years, trained to carry out the attack, pulled it off without a hitch, and no information regarding the attack was ever leaked to anyone.

8. Reference 7. Now someone wants us to believe that these were a bunch of drunken fools who shot pistols in their homes, braggarts, who spoke of impending violence and bloodshed to everyone they met and left incriminating evidence everywhere. We are supposed to believe that by some incredible miracle they escaped the notice of every law enforcement and intelligence agency in the entire world. Now read 7 again.

9. Why did the hi-jackers force passengers to call relatives?

10. They were able to hi-jack 4 large commercial jets full of passengers without any problem.

11. They were able to deviate from the flight plan and crash into their targets without any effort from law enforcement or the military to stop them.

12. The simultaneous hi-jackings of 4 large commercial jet aircraft did not alert anyone to the possibility of the impending attacks.

13. Within an hour of the attacks the FBI knew the names, addresses, flight schools they had attended, the aquaintences of the suspects, and had begun a nationwide roundup... yet they cannot find Chandra Levy nor can they say what happened to Jon Benet Ramsey. Pretty strange don't you think?

So who benefits? The answer is obvious and very disturbing. Everyone in the oil business will benefit, especially the Bush family and their business partners. Everyone in the defense industrial complex will benefit. The United Nations will benefit. The (so called) State of Israel will benefit bigtime. Tyranny in the name of security will benefit and rule over the American People. And dont be surprised if many Patriots and politically incorrect Americans begin to disappear overnight.

the late William Cooper

1:07 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part seventeen

If i'm so far from the truth, why is my blog being censored and my posted photos removed?

The hologram theory and 2-D animation theory have been attacked and ridiculed like no other theories relating to 9-11. In fact, however, they are based on stringent science, on reports from the military community and on careful analysis of the photos and mainstream media news videos of the alleged plane crash into south tower and of at least 11 military stealth crafts close by the south tower.

1. Based on the MIT study of the attacks and twin tower collapse, it is established science that the visible flying craft could not have done any, nor all, of the following:

- the entering craft is in south walls shadow wedge but parts of the craft shine white like a lamp

- the visible flying craft emits a yellow flash instants before nose-touch-wall event

- the visible flying craft cuts six floors which is impossible (Prof. Wierzbicki, MIT)

- the entering craft creates dust pimples that blow outward as from explosions

- the sensitive wing tips do not bend or break off, nor do they flip forward

- the sensitive tips of tail rudder and elevator (winglets) do not break off

- no veer or teeter despite flying in at an angle (about 13 degrees)

- no deceleration despite calculated loss of kinetic energy of 26%

- no deformation, crumple or smash-up of the visible flying object

- no explosion until the visible flying object has faded out of sight

People who are not dumb brainwashed American shills and idiots, i.e. people who can use their senses and their brains, have observed that all the videos that CNN, ABC, NBC and other mainstream news stations showed on 9-11 and the days and weeks thereafter document beyond any doubt that the visible flying craft at south tower did all of the above.

12:30 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part sixteen

Some Proofs of Demolition vs. Collapse

9/11 part fifteen

Only Demolition and Severe Earthquakes Have Leveled Skyscrapers

Steel-frame high-rises have been in use for over a century.

• No steel-frame high-rise has ever collapsed due to fire.
• Other skyscrapers have been ravaged by severe fires. Examples include:
• One Meridian Plaza fire blazed for 18 hours, gutting 8 floors.
• First Interstate Bank Building fire burned for 3-1/2 hours, gutting 4 floors.

Both fires exhibited:

• Large emergent flames
• Extensive window breakage
• Blazes filling multiple entire floors

These fires were much worse than those in the Twin Towers and Building 7.
Neither fire significantly damaged vertical steel columns.

9:11 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part fourteen

8:01 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part thirteen

"The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." Adolf Hitler

7:44 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part twelve

a picture is worth two thousand and one words

2:24 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part eleven

What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001?
The flights alleged to have hit the Nth WTC tower and the Pentagon did not exist. They were not scheduled to fly that day.

On the basis of photographic and physical evidence, it has now been established for some time that on Sept 11, 2001 the damage to the Pentagon was caused by something other than the hijacked Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77 claimed by the government to have crashed into the building. More recently, its become widely accepted on the basis of video evidence that the object which hit the North Tower of the WTC at 8.46 that morning was not the hijacked Boeing 767, American Airlines Flight 11, as claimed in the official story.

In response to these observations, both supporters of the truth and blind deniers of it agree on one thing. It raises the question - "If these flights did not hit the buildings as alleged, then where did they go?'

We are now in a position to answer that question.

First lets recap on the official story of what happened to four planes that morning. AA 11 left Boston for LA at about 8 am, was reported as hijacked about 8.25, and hit the Nth Tower at about 8.46. UA 175 left Boston for LA at about the same time, was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Sth Tower at about 9.03 AA 77 left Dulles for LA about the same time , was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Pentagon at about 9.45 UA 93 left Newark for SF at about the same time, was reported hijacked about 9.45 and crashed in PA at about 10.10.  The Bureau of transportation website contains search pages, where one can pull up detailed statistics about the history of which flights have been scheduled for which airports on any given day. Go to
http://www.bts.gov/ntda/oai/index.shtml
and click on "detailed statistics" where one can search records of scheduled and actual departure times, arrival times, diversions and cancellations by departure airport, arrival airport, airline and flight number. Searches for Sept 11 2001 reveal that the flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist. They were not scheduled that day. Here are the search results which I encourage everyone to check for themselves.

A search for UA flights from Newark on Sept 11, 2001 shows 0093 to SF was scheduled at 8.00 and actually departed at 8.01. It is listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination. A search for UA from Boston on that day shows 0175 to LA was scheduled for 8.00 and actually departed at 7.58. Also listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination. The term "diverted" does not specify any differentiation between legally diverted, hijacked or crashed, so the data gives no indication one way or the other as to truth of the official story about what happened to them, but it does confirm that they departed as per the official story and did not arrive at their destinations. A search for AA flights from Boston that day does not list 0011. The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA that day was 0181 at 11.00 A search for AA flights from Dulles that day does not list 0077. The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA was 0135 at 11.15.

If you search for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that they were regularly scheduled flights right up to Sept 10. AA 11 was scheduled daily from Logan to LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not scheduled. Not cancelled. Just not scheduled. On Sept 12, they re-appear in the schedule (obviously as cancelled for the next few days) up until Sept 20 when both flights change their numbers. Thus the official figures from the Bureau of Transportation statistics indicate that neither AA 11 nor AA 77 flew on Sept, 11 2001. This solves the question of what happened to them. Nothing. Because the flights did not exist. This is consistent with other evidence which shows that they were not the objects responsible for the Pentagon and Nth WTC tower incidents.

This still leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the passengers alleged to be aboard the non existent flights. In the case of AA 77, while one can always speculate about the most plausible scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real evidence emerges. However in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that UA 175 left from the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as that normally applicable to AA 11.

Therefore, although there is no direct evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate at this stage that any passengers who were regular fliers on AA 11, and asked to booked on it that day, went to the airport, expecting to get on AA 11, as per the normal routine. They were then told that there was a last minute problem with the flight which could not be fixed within a reasonable period of time, and were offered a flight on UA 175 as compensation. The data in this search indicates that we have been systematically lied to about the alleged flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11 and AA 77, as well as the alleged phone calls made from the planes. It also indicates probable complicity by American Airlines in the events of Sept 11 , 2001. For the benefit of any NWO operatives reading this, just in case you' re thinking of trying to pressure the Bureau into playing hanky panky with the records, the search results pages have already been backed up and widely distributed. Nevertheless, I do encourage all readers to do the searches themselves and back up the results pages, just in case this happens.

        Gerard Homgren 8:44am Thu Nov 13 '03

12:04 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

9/11 part ten

Why does whether any planes hit the World Trade Center matter? After all the people are all still dead. Lots of terrible things have happened since 9/11/01. Why should we continue talking about it? Well, for several reasons. First, the so called Bush government appears to be ready to attack Iran using nuclear weapons. This might unleash a new world war. In addition, Washington is expected to introduce a military state that rivals the Nazis in cruelty. They are already building concentration camps in the US. They plan to take millions out. Second, what is significant about the 911 Hoax is how it was conducted. If the Bush government has such total control over the news media that the latter could be made to air fake planes striking the World Trade Center then no media figure can be believed. This means that the progressive, anti-war movement is extremely infiltrated.  Last, the only means with which the so called Bush regime can be dislodged is if the general public suddenly realizes what a monstrous hoax was perpetuated against all humanity. The indoctrination achieved from the fake image of planes striking the WTC enabled Washington to start two wars as a "response". They've also destroyed the US Constitution on behalf of "protecting" Americans from the fear that they manufactured with phony video. The only way Americans can recover what was lost is if suddenly everyone wasn't so afraid.
               Scott Loughrey

"When they kick in your front door, how you conna come? With your hands on your head, or on the trigger of your gun?" - The Clash 1979; the Guns of Brixton

"Wars are not meant to be won, they are meant to be continual." George Orwell

..> ..>

If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
	And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.

And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper? And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.       Genisis 4, 7-10

"Until philosophers rule as kings or those who are now called kings and leading men genuinely and adequately philosophise, that is, until political power and philosophy entirely coincide, while the many natures who at present pursue either one exclusively are forcibly prevented from doing so, cities will have no rest from evils,... nor, I think, will the human race." Plato

8:11 AM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment