The Green Pill

Last Updated:
Jun 12, 2006

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 23
Sign: Capricorn

City: GRAND JUNCTION
State: COLORADO
Country: US

Signup Date: 06/06/06

Blog Archive
Older     Newer ]


Tuesday, July 10, 2007

What could really happen?

What Really Happens

By Tristian

I've been out of the works for a while traveling around the US seeing different things I couldn't see from being stranded in Grand Junction, Colorado. I wanted to know what could really happen if I wanted to be a drifter in the classical sense of the word. I didn't know what I would find until I tried. So I guess I didn't really travel the US, more like a few states here and there.

Colorado is beautiful. It has this majestic sense to it that I can't seem to find anywhere else. I would talk to people in gas stations in just about anywhere I went in Colorado to see how they felt about the way certain things are. To my surprise I found that people who live in Colorado don't actually like Colorado all that much. Sad! I also learned that you couldn't buy scratch tickets all over the place.

I learned that supporting myself was harder then I thought. I would stay with friends I knew from Grand Junction, and traveled by bus. I was using the money my parents saved for me since I was little. Grand Junction to Denver was easy. You just hop on a bus, or train, or tiny little plane and get there within a matter of hours. I never really traveled far from Denver before, and that's where I had the most trouble. First, I couldn't find my motel. Everything in Denver has a name that implies some dead president or some kind of nut, or club hopper. Then they have sideways streets that have numbers that turn into names, which turn back into numbers.

I found myself at the 16th street mall. Lots of people were playing some kind of instrument on the corners whether it be a saxophone to something vocal, to some trashcans. Very clean. I got hit up for money four times while only walking a few blocks though. The homeless in Denver are a lot different from say New York, or California. In Denver they don't look like those stereotypical homeless who push around shopping carts full of fallen dreams. They ware suit jackets, and are rather clean-shaven. It's like they do it for fun. In California most of the homeless (to me anyway) were higher society: prostitute like.

From the 16th Street Mall, I met up with my friend Paul, who said he would show me the nightlife. We first went back to his loft located somewhere where you had to make three rights, which normally makes a left except in Denver, and ended up in this parking garage that had more areas to park then there were apartments in the building. We came across a website called, Milehighnights.com which shows all the hotspots of Denver.

We were waiting until nightfall and hit Blake Street. Blake is filled with lots and lots of different restaurants, clubs, hookah bars, and just an overall party theme. To bad I wasn't old enough to enter the door of any of these places though. While walking the street I got hit on by anyone and everyone cause alcohol filled the air waves so thick you could get tipsy just by breathing to hard. So we met a few folks who seemed to be pretty sober. We asked them how the felt about the Denver nightlife. According to them, it's one of the best times of the week and it is what made Colorado so great.

We stopped off at a local coffee house that stays open all night. They had concoctions of all sorts of different drinks, and really comfortable seating. Paul and I just sat there and talked for hours with the owners about how business usually runs and how the setting never really changes. Apparently Denver isn't as dangerous as everyone makes it seem. There hasn't been anything consistent since they owned the place and all the time they worry more about someone loitering then they do anything else.

The more you know the less it tries to hurt you, is a motto I like to follow, and in this situation it worked out great. Paul and I walked back over to his place for a well-deserved night of rest. Overall, a perfect first stop on my journey, and I never did find that hotel.

10:21 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

More Than a Justification of Materialism?
Current mood: confused
Category: Goals, Plans, Hopes

More Than a Justification of Materialism?

By: Andrea

 

Maybe it's just the biological age that I'm at, but I use to feel a huge need to travel and experience the world.  I wanted to sell everything I had, travel to a distant country, and learn and do everything I could without abandon.           

 

I still feel that urge.  But lately I also have the urge to settle down, find a nice town to live in with a nice community, a nice church.  I want nice kitchen wear, nice furniture, a nice guy (yes, that scares me too that I put him in that list with the material things).  I want a comfortable place that is securely mine.  I want a quiet place where I can go home to read and do crafts at, have dinner parties, and get a full night of sleep… a place that feels like home.

 

            I worry I'm getting more materialistic.  I worry that getting comfortable isn't necessarily a good thing.  Everything is temporary.  I don't want to become attached, especially to superficial things.  I thought that maybe I was giving up on my dreams- that they scared me more than I am willing to admit.   Maybe my change of priorities might keep me here. 

Then, and I realized this is connected- I have developed ridiculously maternal reactions to babies and men who needed my help.  A male friend asked me to mend some pants for him since his mom wasn't there to do it for him.  I was so happy to take that role on and do whatever he needed.  I also sent him away with lunch and some extra food for later.    Babies will distract me more than anything else.  If there is the most exciting concert I've ever seen and a cute baby, my eyes will wonder to the baby.  The urge to boop noses, tickle toes, and pet soft baby hair is intense. 

Maybe materialism is human nature.  Maybe it's a desire to set up a home that will feel like a home for your babies.  Maybe the desire for security isn't that selfish.  I don't want my kids to have to worry about housing.  I want somewhere safe and comfortable for them.  I didn't have the security desires as much as I do now, but at that time, I didn't have the same maternal feels as I do now.    It's possible to be non-materialistic when you have kids, but it must be harder.  I think biology and mother nature tells us what we should do.  When we get hungry, that's our body telling us to eat.  When we get horny, it's our bodies telling us to breed.  Men have a need to protect things, that helps society.  Women have a need to nurture, that's good too.  Babies are cute so we will take care of them.  The dream to explore teaches us about the world, and should be ignored.  So, maybe now, the urge to nest and collect excess has a purpose, to provide for future dependent people, also, should not be ignored. 

2:27 PM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

Monday, October 16, 2006

Debate: Contraception for Married Couples?

Debate: Contraception for Married Couples?

 

Mathew- I want this topic to be about birth control.

 

Andrea- What about it?  What's the issue?

 

Mathew- Well, I've been debating lately with people about whether birth control is ok for married people.

 

Andrea- What the hell are you talking about!

 

Andrea- How is that even an issue, of course it's ok.  Are you trying to stop married people from having sex too now?

 

Tristan- Go Andrea!

 

Mathew- It is an issue.  Birth control pills mess with human biology.  And barrier methods prevent conception.  That makes sex more about lust than its natural purpose.

 

Andrea- What about the purpose of bonding husband and wife!

 

Tristian- I agree with Andrea.

 

Andrea- And who cares if it is just for pleasure - especially between married people!?

 

Jon- I sort of agree with Matthew and Andrea.

 

Tristian- Yes, let us all have children because Matthew wants more of a pleasurable sex life.

 

Mathew- I just want to allow nature to happen without me trying to play God.

 

Jon- It's not about that, per se, it's about human biology in the aspect of birth control can sometimes be harmful.

 

Mathew- That's very true.  It used to cause cancer in thousands of women before they considered taking it off the shelves for more research.

 

Andrea- God could break through a condom if he wanted to- he does it all the time.

 

Tristian- Well even if contraception were illegal would the topic of abortion still be the same?

 

Andrea- There would be a lot more unwanted pregnancies- probably making the abortion issue an even bigger concern.

 

Jon- were not talking about abortion we're talking about contraceptives.

 

Tristian- I agree with Andrea again. Contraceptives do more help then harm.

 

Jon- In Reality, but has anyone ever really thought about the consequences?

 

Mathew- I don't think its right to trick a woman's body into thinking she's pregnant.  There has to be psychological, biological, and spiritual consequences of that.  

 

Jon- Agreed. Though I'm not a woman, I've known girls who were on "the pill" and their hormones were going crazy.

 

Tristian- So you're saying if men understood what it was like to have "the pill" this debate would sway?

 

Mathew- Also, not using contraceptives is like saying that you trust god fully to help you create your family. 

 

Andrea- As a female I know that BCP's do mess a girl up really bad.  The only reason I'm leery of them is because I've been on them and it was horrible.

 

Jon- I don't look at it as god's way of saying you should or should not have children. I look at it as they impede the way of natural living.

 

Tristian- What do you mean by that?

 

Jon- I mean, that if you're fated to have children, you're going to have children, not because of any unseen force, but just because you were meant to have children. As they say, no contraceptive is 100%

 

Andrea- That's very true!

 

Tristian- But that is not true Jon, meaning that fate will keep you from having children if you have sex 4 times a day without protection.

 

Tristian- If my partner and I don't want kids, but yet we don't use protection, then how do we even have a shot of not getting pregnant.

 

Andrea- Your odds definitely go up without contraception.

 

Jon- According to a federal report, "33 million condoms were recalled or rejected in the last year".

 

Mathew- Well, I also don't like the idea of condoms because it blocks the pheromones so they don't work as effectively to bond people. 

 

Mathew- A woman's body recognizes the man, and connects them even more.

 

Tristian- I agree with Matthew in that a woman's body recognizes the man, and connects the man even more.

 

Tristian- but, your odds of pregnancy go up, and if you don't want children, that's bad.

 

Tristian- studies also show, "Only about 4 in every 1,000 domestic condoms were deemed defective".

 

Mathew- But as you say, God can work around the condoms anyway, so I guess you're meant to get one of those four if it's meant to be, so why even worry about it?

 

Jon- Well, that's all just condoms, yes they're pretty safe, even though studies also show, "Imported condoms proved more risky, with a defective rate of 6.5 for every 1,000, which was still a drop from last year's rate of 7.3".

 

Tristian- My point is that condoms are one kind of contraceptive and they're generally effective, and safe.

 

Andrea- But Mathew, don't you and your wife use rhythm method?  That's a way of changing your odds.

 

Jon- What's rhythm method?  Is that like the emergency pill?

 

Andrea- It's when you don't have sex when the woman is ovulating, to bring down the chance of getting pregnant.

 

Mathew- That's true, but it's not an unnatural method.

 

Andrea- It's purposely trying to prevent pregnancy.

 

Tristian- But contraceptives would make sure you could have sex when you want it.

 

Mathew- But the chance of getting pregnant is still there- which is good because that's the point of sex.

 

Andrea- But if you purposely do something to lower the chances- you're admitting that you're mostly doing it for pleasure and not to make babies.

 

Mathew- But it's still a more natural method that doesn't block pheromones and it still leaves the chances more open for a pregnancy to occur.

 

Jon- Matthew, it sounds like you want to have children

 

Andrea- But, you're still trying to prevent pregnancy- so you're a hypocrite!

 

Mathew- I do want to have kids- family is the most precious thing we have in life.

 

Jon- Hey what do you guys think about Emergency Contraception – its birth control that prevents pregnancy after sex, which is why it is sometimes called "the morning after pill".

 

Andrea- The only thing EC is good for is to prevent abortion in an unfortunate situation that someone got into because they didn't use contraception for whatever reason.

 

Andrea- it should only be for emergencies

 

Mathew- If you don't want to have kids, don't have sex.

 

Tristian- Well, let us try to put this in the view of someone who doesn't want to have children.

 

Jon- I don't want children, but contraceptives still impede maximum pleasure no matter what the box says.

 

Andrea- What about married couples who don't want kids?

 

Tristian- So you're saying you're not allowed to have sex unless you want babies.

 

Jon- I disagree, if sex were made for procreation alone, then there would be no pleasure involved.

 

Mathew- The purpose of sex is to make babies (and to bond husbands and wives) - it's not for acting out your lust.

 

Tristian- I agree with Jon.

 

Jon- Finally!

 

Andrea- God made it feel good so you'll keep doing it- even if you don't' know all the reasons of why.

 

Tristian- But, I do think sex should be had for making LOVE, not babies, babies should be an outcome of a joyous experience.

 

Jon- How does sex work into homosexual relationships?

 

Mathew- It shouldn't

 

Tristian- I think were sticking to heterosexual relationships at the moments

 

Tristian- Besides the homophobic comment. Gays have sex; it's just as simple as that

 

Jon- Agreed

 

Jon- Then that brings about the subject of contraception when in a common law gay relationship, since it's as close to marriage as the gays can get.

 

Tristian- But we were talking about the married heterosexuals.

 

Mathew- God's laws are more important than man's laws and God hasn't changed his mind on that, even if this country is getting weak on that issue.

 

Andrea- Boys!  Boys!  Back to the issue!

 

Andrea- So, I want to know what April thinks about it, since she's apparently on Mathew's side too.

 

April- Hey, I'm here.

 

April- I agree with Mathew, it is a way for people to bond- with the pheromones and because every time you make love there's an agreement that you could get pregnant and that's good or at least ok.

 

Jon- Wait, so you're saying you've just been LUCKY enough to not get pregnant.

 

Tristian- But I guess if they want children eventually, its okay.

 

April- It's more that God doesn't want us to have children yet.  But we want to stay open to the possibility.  And that's true- we do want children as soon as god wants us to.

 

Jon- Alright, so then, the non-contraception works for them.

 

Tristian- Well, I suppose, but not in a literal since. They've just gotten lucky.

 

Andrea- So why do you use the rhythm method then?

 

April- Because it's a way to prevent pregnancy when it's less convenient.  But we wouldn't have gotten married if we weren't prepared to have kids now.

 

Jon- That sure is a holier then thou attitude though.

 

Andrea- So you're worried about the timing of having kids, but you wouldn't allow anyone to take more precautions.  What about a married couple who's in financial troubles all of a sudden.

 

Tristian- Good point.

 

Jon- They shouldn't have children then.

 

Tristian- So you're saying, "Only the rich are allowed to have children".

 

Jon- No, only those who can afford it.

 

Mathew- I guess that's a good point, I hadn't really thought about that.  I guess there are some circumstances that people might need to be more careful.  But that's only for the very poor who can't afford kids, not just them being an inconvenience.

 

Jon- I'm saying abstinence is the best form of contraceptive.

 

Tristian- For teenagers maybe, for a married couple . . . not so much.

 

Mathew- But you wouldn't get pregnant unless it was meant to be.  Also, I think maybe you should consider abstinence during the hard times.  Also rhythm is fairly effective.

 

Tristian- NO, you've just been lucky.

 

Tristian- You shouldn't promote something that has luckily worked for you guys.

 

Mathew- Statistics say that it's fairly affective.  The Rhythm Method is more than 91% affective.  Basal Body Temperature (BBT) Method is 98% effective.  It's about as affective as Cervical Caps.  And BBT method is more affective.

 

Jon- Good point.

 

Tristian- Those methods are for those who want to spend the time and effort into knowing when you're ovulating, and charts and lots of other things that make sex a business meeting rather then making love.

 

Jon- But it makes sex more natural and pleasurable.

 

Mathew- It's bonding to talk about the possibilities with your partner and talk about it realistically.  It shouldn't be taken lightly.  Sex is a big deal.

 

Tristian- I can talk before I have sex, and after, not a three months procedure about possibly having sex next year.

 

Andrea- If you're really trying to be natural you would just leave it totally up to fate and do it when ever you felt the desire and you wouldn't think about any form of preventing pregnancy- including rhythm method.

 

Jon- But it's a way to get rid of unhealthy and unnatural contraceptives.

 

Tristian - But you get rid of the ones that are as natural as they come, LIKE condoms. Condoms may not be the nicest things to put on, or to try and get off, but they are quick, fast and efficient.

 

Jon- This coming from the virgin.

 

Andrea- lol.

 

Tristian- Be that as it may, the process is quick and effective according to studies.

 

Jon- lol.

 

Mathew- Should sex be a quick and effective process?

 

Andrea- Said the man that tells his wife when they can't have sex because of a calendar. 

 

April- Hey!  He doesn't tell me when we can have sex.  I have a say in it too.  

 

Tristian- LOL Andrea.

 

Tristian- I'm talking about the process to have sex, shouldn't be spent on months of preparation. It should be easy to get into the act and have a longer time of pleasure without worry.

 

Jon- Well, condoms impede pleasure especially if they were imported.

 

Tristian- Well let us say it is the best condoms they have out there. They work just as fine.

 

Jon- According to whom . . . virgin.

 

Mathew- How do you explain that it blocks the pheromones?

 

Tristian- It doesn't block pleasure.

 

Jon- But it blocks spiritual connection. 

Mathew- What about the bonding pheromones?

 

Tristian- This coming from the agnostic

 

Mathew- its science, not just spirituality.

 

Tristian- It's more of a mental connection.

 

Tristian- But I'm not worried about mental connection when the need is about to happen.

 

Mathew- But the connection is one of the main points of sex.   

 

Jon- And that the connection of sex in marriage is key

 

Andrea- Ok everyone- Closing statements!

 

April- I think people should do whatever is most natural and leaves some chances up to fate, in whatever they do, sex or otherwise.

 

Tristian- I think contraceptives bring about a way to move from third base to the home plate without worry of a child, or a necessity to plan. They also provide comfort in knowing you won't catch something such as herpes.

 

Jon- I think natural ways are more . . . natural, but the bonds and the pleasure are more comforting without contraceptives especially in marital relationships along with common law. So unless it would be somehow harming to where contraceptives would be best, I think they are unnecessary.

 

Mathew- I think sex is a sacred act between a married man and a woman and no unnatural barriers should be used to impede that sacred act and all the spiritual things that it brings about- that we know about or not.

 

Andrea- I think everyone should do what they think is best for them.

10:28 PM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Volume 5 Article: 1

The Path to Change Starts with, What?

by Tritian

The world as we know it is full of changes. Different presidents, weather changes, wars, crimes, birth rates, bus schedules, cities; they're all changing. Everything is full of never ending changes. So here is the question I pose, "If everything will eventually change, how does the change happen, is it from protests? Natural selection? Or something else?"

I'm not going to answer this question, but I can speculate a few issues. Let us go with slavery. We can all agree that it wasn't going to last forever. Even if the African Americans were not liberated, they would eventually have been replaced by machines and let free in society. Yes, through the crimes and punishment, it would have eventually ended because society is constantly changing.

Society's changes can be influenced, this is a fact, but is it by a person or a group. People say if it wasn't for Martin Luther King Jr. or Gandhi certain moments in life wouldn't have happened. If there lives were not gone the way that they did, we would still be living with selfish moments? So does a selfless act show more to change society or is it the courageous courage like Alexander the Great or Brutality of Hitler?

All these questions can be pondered, but an answer will can't be given because the facts don't show what the single event was. Why did the Roman Empire fall? People speculate it was destined to fall. I don't believe in destiny. I believe in the facts. The facts gathered over the years state that the Roman Empire fell because it was doomed to fall. This makes more sense because when people get too big for their future or move to fast, it will fall.

So let me bring a few pieces of the scattered puzzle together. No one can pinpoint the domino that started the horrible event that can change society. Saying Hitler was the cause of the holocaust is a bit much to fathom. To say Martin Luther King Jr., began the end of slavery is just wrong. Certain events had to happen for another and combined they bring about change. Maybe, just maybe, if the right events were to happen, there would be another event that would cause the world and all its inhabitants to die, or maybe, lead to a better future. So sense no one know what these occurrences are, people just keep protesting, and trying to make their cause heard.

 

10:11 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

The new system.

Sorry folks but The green pill has been going under some new management system. You're going to see some new writers and new ideas brought forth.

10:08 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Debate: Abortion

Lately, we have had some conversations/debates that we thought we should turn into articles here.  Ideally we would have them publicly or on tape, but since this is a written thing, we thought wed stick to that for now.  We welcome any comments here and/or on our group page- The Green Pill Group. 

 

Debate Topic: Abortion

 

Mathew: One of the political topics that I personally care about the most is abortion, so I picked that to be the topic. 

 

Andrea:  Its an important topic

 

Mathew:  I think it is murder, no matter the circumstances. 

 

Andrea:  What if the baby has serious birth defects? 

 

Mathew:  If it seriously risks the mother or the baby wont be able to make it to term, then abortion is more ok.  But, even if the baby has birth defects, it still has the right to live.  If God didnt want that baby to be alive, then it wouldnt be alive. 

 

Andrea:  You cant look at it from just a religious stand point though. 

 

Mathew:  How else is there to look at it?

 

Andrea:  From reality.  Not everyone has the same religious views.  Not everyone thinks its morally wrong.  Its a fact of life that there are unwanted pregnancies.  Abortions happen, we need to make sure they are legal and safe. 

 

Mathew:  Religion is reality, it gives us guidance and understanding.  Nothing is separate from religion.  Abortions dont have to be just a fact of life.  If people didnt have pre-marital sex, waited until they were ready for marriage, and were responsible for their sexuality- then there would be fewer unwanted pregnancies.  And when an accident happens- theres always adoption. 

 

Andrea:  What if the woman is pregnant because of rape?  The women did nothing wrong- should she be punished by nine months of pregnancy and child birth because of it?

 

Mathew:  A child shouldnt die because of the sins of others.  True, its not the womans fault, but its not the childs either.  If the mother aborts the child, she is committing murder.  If she carries the child to term, then she is giving the child a chance at life.  Shell be blessed in her life for the good act.  So be a sinner for aborting, or give the gift of life to an innocent child. 

 

Andrea:  Take it out of the religious context thought and it looks unfair.

 

Mathew:  Unfair?  A child never getting a chance at life is unfair.  When you take the religion out of it its the same deal.  Its unfortunate that the woman was raped.  She is either giving that innocent child a life or not.  Whats the non-religious right thing to do?  Its not a punishment for her to give someone life. 

 

Andrea:  I think youre presuming that the fetus has a soul.

 

Mathew:  I think it does.  And even if we dont non-religiously know when the soul enters the body, but we do know that it does eventually.  That fetus will become a person, whether it is or isnt at that stage of development.  Its a persons chance at life.

 

Andrea:  So, lets say that abortion stays legal- do you think that men have a right in whether the woman gets an abortion?  What if she doesnt know who the father is?  Or a teenage mom needing permission from her parents and boyfriend.  Theres a lot of problems with that. 

 

Mathew:  The man and the woman- Lets not sugar coat it.  Youre really asking if the father of the child has a right to say whether his child lives or dies.  First- its hard to think about since I think abortion should be illegal, but since it is legal, I do think that the father should have a say.  First, people shouldnt be sleeping around so much that they dont know who the father is.  And people shouldnt be sleeping with people they dont trust enough to tell something like that to.  You are risking your body and risking possible pregnancy.  (One of the arguments is that its the womans body, so she should have the choice- but these women are out there risking their bodies knowing the risks) Why do that with someone you dont know or trust.  And the teenage mom shouldnt be having sex until shes ready.  If people didnt have sex before marriage and didnt marry until they were financially independent and ready, then we wouldnt have that problem.  And parents should know.  A pregnant teenage mom is in a very vulnerable state and needs guidance from someone older.  And there are issues about abusive and unsupportive parents and not being able to tell them, but once again, not having pre-marital sex solves that one too.  

 

 

Andrea:  So, everyone should stop having sex because of your religious views? 

 

Mathew:  No, people dont have to do it because religiously I think they should.  And they dont even have to acknowledge any possible religious repercussions of their actions.   But, people should be responsible for themselves.  If youre going to be having sex, do it responsibly so you arent causing yourself or others harm.  Be responsible for your actions and your biological realities.  If you have sex, you might get pregnant.  Be responsible.  That is your child- religion or not.  You created it by your actions- knowing the possible consequences of your actions.  So, either dont have sex when you arent able to be responsible for it, dont have sex with people who wont support you in that risk, and if you do get pregnant- be responsible enough to give that child a chance despite your previous irresponsible behavior.      

 

Andrea:  Alright, I agree with you somewhat on that.  People should be more responsible and think more about the consequences of their actions.  But I think it should still be legal and up to mother to decide, based on her own beliefs. 

 

Mathew:  Thats fine.  I believe abortion should be illegal unless it jeopardizes the mothers life or the baby has no chance of surviving.  I dont think laws should be up to the individual to decide for themselves.  We dont let murders kill people if they choose to because they thought it wasnt wrong.  We know its wrong- so its illegal.  I dont know why abortion should be any different.   

6:03 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Two new writers!
Current mood: excited

We would like to formally introduce two new writers for The Green Pill:

 

Andrea-

Andrea received her associates degree in sociology from University of North Carolina.  She is now a student at Mesa studying art.  Some of her interests are world cultures, sociology of family, anthropology, and human relationships.

 

Lisa-

Lisa is currently a sociology major.  She is interested in social psychology of religion, mass media, gender, and other topics.  Shes also interested in philosophy, world cultures, history, and various kinds of activism. 

9:00 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Volume 4 Article: 2
Current mood: peaceful

Abstinence: More Than Good Birth Control

Thoughts by Andrea, written by April

 

In high school, we constantly heard about how abstinence was one of many good forms of birth control.  Thats true- it is a good form of birth control.  There is so much more to it though. 

 

            About two years ago, I started seriously thinking about abstinence.  At first it was just a passing though, just an idea.  I thought about what it would be like to be pregnant at this stage in my life.  Thats a scary thought.  Theres so much I want to get done before I have kids.  I also dont think any of my previous boyfriends would have been ready for kids at that point in their lives.  I thought about how horrible it would be to get an STD.  I thought about how sex connects people, especially girls.  I thought about the heartbreak Id experienced because of my attachments to those boyfriends and to other I could have been as attached to.  I was fortunate to see through many occasions of guys trying to use me for sex.  I could have been attached to them too, with absolutely no return. 

 

            I decided to make a list of pros and cons of why I should be abstinent.  I came up with literally over a hundred reasons to be abstinent and only a few reasons to be abstinent (which were easily countered).  I bought a book soon after called Sensual Celibacy.  Its a great book.  It had a few reasons I hadnt thought of and gave me inspiration to think about abstinence more seriously.  The book recommends deciding for yourself when its appropriate for you to have sex (ex: flings, serious relationship, marriage, etc.).  Before, I had believed it was ok to have sex with serious, committed boyfriends.  But, looking at my list, I realized that truly, the most emotionally and physically secure time to have sex would be within marriage.  Here are some of the reasons why I believe this:

 

1. Sex can create babies.  This is a no-duh statement.  Abortion, adoption, or raising a child are all huge decisions that will forever change your life, your partners life, and the life of your child.  A married, prepared couple is the best situation for a child to be born into.  I want that for my children.  I dont want my selfish desires in the moment to get in the way of our futures. 

 

2. Sex creates bonds between people.  Sex is an extremely intimate act.  Its the closest two people can physically be to each other.  Its a beautiful, spiritual experience.  Two people are totally exposed and vulnerable to each other.  Trust, closeness, love are shown during sex.  It shouldnt be shared with just anyone.  If someone can share that with just anyone, than they have lost that special-ness that sex is.  Sense sex is a way of creating babies, which creates families, breaking up with a lover is like losing a family member- which is so much worse than losing a boyfriend or a girlfriend. 

 

3. STDs.  If people only had sex with their spouses, the occurrences of stds would go down drastically.  Not totally, since there are already diseases out there, and since not every person can be faithful.  Sex is risky.  You never know who is infected.  Is it really worth risking your health?  Is it worth risking your future spouses health?  I dont think so.

 

4. There are many broken homes because of irresponsible sexuality.  Society needs stable families.  Children need mothers and fathers.  They need responsible parents who want them.  Society is hurt by teen pregnancies, unexpected pregnancies, dead beat dads, and single parent households.  These issues are caused by more than just un-wed sexuality, but it could cut down on these issues too.

 

5. There are spiritual and religious reasons to not have sex.  I saved this for last, since it doesnt apply to everyone.  Many religious commandments are there to help society and individuals.  They arent arbitrarily made up.  Its usually good advice.  Who you want to share that spiritual connection with, is also, something think about.  Monks give up sex to focus on more spiritual things.  Others give it up so they can focus that energy on things they need to do (ex: missionaries, sports players, etc.). 

 

I could go on for pages about all the reasons I think abstinence is best for people.  But, I think these are some of the important reasons.  After two years of abstinence, in the prime of my college years, I have to say that I am thankful that I made that decision.  Ive met many guys who are willing to wait and respect my choice.  They do exist.  I have more self-respect, more emotional security, less stress, and Ive learned to look for entirely different and more quality guys. 

5:45 PM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Friday, August 18, 2006