I am not quite sure what the advantage is in having a few more dollars to spend if the air is too dirty to breathe, the water too polluted to drink, the commuters are losing out in the struggle to get in and out of the city, the streets are filthy, and the schools so bad that the young perhaps wisely stay away, and the hoodlums roll citizens for some of the dollars they saved in the tax cut. ~John Kenneth Galbraith The atom bombs are piling up in the factories, the police are prowling through the cities, the lies are streaming from the loudspeakers, but the earth is still going round the sun. ~George Orwell, Shooting an Elephant, 1950 It is one of the maladies of our age to profess a frenzied allegiance to truth in unimportant matters, to refuse consistently to face her where graver issues are at stake. ~Norman Douglas Society honors its living conformists and its dead troublemakers. ~Mignon McLaughlin We create an environment where it is alright to hate, to steal, to cheat, and to lie if we dress it up with symbols of respectability, dignity and love. ~Whitney Moore, Jr. Nothing can be more readily disproved than the old saw, "You can't keep a good man down." Most human societies have been beautifully organized to keep good men down. ~John W. Gardner When we think of the past, we forget the fools and remember the sage. We reverse the process for our own time. ~George Boas So long as all the increased wealth which modern progress brings goes but to build up great fortunes, to increase luxury and make sharper the contrast between the House of Have and the House of Want, progress is not real and cannot be permanent. ~Henry George, Progress and Poverty, 1879 Failure seems to be regarded as the one unpardonable crime, success as the all-redeeming virtue, the acquisition of wealth as the single worthy aim of life. The hair-raising revelations of skullduggery and grand-scale thievery merely incite others to surpass by yet bolder outrages and more corrupt combinations. ~Charles Francis Adams The world is governed more by appearance than realities so that it is fully as necessary to seem to know something as to know it. ~Daniel Webster The tragedy of it is that nobody sees the look of desperation on my face. Thousands and thousands of us, and we're passing one another without a look of recognition. ~Henry Miller Armaments, universal debt and planned obsolescence - those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. ~Aldous Huxley, Island We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork. ~Milton Friedman The quintessential revolution is that of the spirit, born of an intellectual conviction of the need for change in those mental attitudes and values which shape the course of a nation's development. A revolution which aims merely at changing official policies and institutions with a view to an improvement in material conditions has little chance of genuine success. Without a revolution in spirit, the forces which had produced inequities of the old order would continue to be operative, posing a constant threat to the process of reform and regeneration. It is not enough merely to call for freedom, democracy and human rights. There has to be a united determination to persevere in the struggle, to make sacrifices in the name of enduring truths, to resist the corrupting influences of desire, ill will, ignorance, and fear. ~Aung San Suu Kyi http://www.quotegarden.com/society.html

Bill

Last Updated:
Sep 16, 2008

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 54
Sign: Libra

City: DELRAY BEACH
State: Florida
Country: US

Signup Date: 05/01/05

My Blog Groups

must we start a fuckin revolution up in here?
Previous |Random|Next

What's Wrong With America Today
Previous |Random|Next


Browse Blog Groups


My Subscriptions
Tom
Lo
"IM SO HOOD"
mary (CRONE)
Arielle
I-P
Mama Hippie
B'Ob-ama for Obama
Dude - Campaign for Liberty- Voting 3rd Party
Chris
0pen y0ur eye$ @nd y0ur m!nd...b4 !+$ +0 l@+e ...
LIVE For the Revolution
Because you're so wonderful,
Matt
~Master Of My Domain~
madeup
The Judge
Maria
Arundhati Roy Supporters
Jet Set Willy II
I Am Like You
Robin
Cheryl
Policy Reform in Action
Derek Wallace - organicreform.org

Blog Archive
Older     Newer ]


Monday, October 06, 2008

Our security can only be found in unity with all Humanity.
Current mood: fabulous

My friend Itay posted the following on the Peace & Justice group.

"You know what's sad?  I cant even fantasize a world of brotherly peace.. that's how much I disbelieve that I'll live in a world where one day I wont be a target."

My reply to him (including quotes);

"Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War. He is the only one that gathers his brethren about him and goes forth in cold blood and calm pulse to exterminate his kind. He is the only animal that for sordid wages will march out... and help to slaughter strangers of his own species who have done him no harm and with whom he has no quarrel.... And in the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for "the universal brotherhood of man" - with his mouth."
~Mark Twain

"What a country calls its vital . . . interests are not things that help its people live, but things that help it make war. Petroleum is a more likely cause of international conflict than wheat."
~Simone Weil, Ecrits historiques et politiques, 1960

"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets."
~Voltaire, War



I understand your feelings Itay. I assume that you are saying that because of violence and hate directed at Jews and Israelis. Violence and hate are universal problems. My son is a Black Jew. I doubt that he will ever experience violence because of his Jewish heritage but I do believe that it is possible that he could experience violence because of the Black part of his heritage. Most of the violence in the world is caused by structural and geopolitical conflict. Millions die worldwide from poverty and preventable disease. Thousands die from proxy wars enabled by powerful nations to insure control and influence. In spite of the promises Humanity made to ourselves after WWII to "never again" allow genocide, we have had several genocides or near genocides since WWII.

Our security can only be found in unity with all Humanity. We must defend Humanity rather than seek the false promises of nationalism, classism, narrow ideology or a fractured and exclusive religiosity. There are good people and bad people in every group under the sun. There is a class of good people that is of a higher order than the "goodness" found in group loyalty. Truly good people seek to build bridges to other good people in all groups but most especially with those groups that they have a history of conflict with. Hold your head high Itay, avoid foolishly endangering yourself but don't fear Humanity. The vast majority of the world's people are decent people trapped by the circumstances of life and birth and yet when given the chance, most people will rise to the occasion when offered kindness and respect. Don't allow fear blind you to all the beautiful people all around you. There are some cool Arabs just waiting for a cool Jewish friend like you. Give it a chance Bro.

3:12 AM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

All Living Beings are material representations of G_d
Current mood: tired

This was a letter sent to another group in reply to a group member.  There was a discussion about religion and the death penalty.  Digging through my files, I came across it again and thought that my dear readers would like to read my thoughts on some of the topics discussed.  Besides that, I want to get blogging again and I'm too, tired and too lazy and maybe a bit uninspired to come up with any new ideas.  Then again, sometimes the old ideas are the best.

Peas & Luv,

Bill

**************************************

Greg;

I pray that I won't find myself guilty of the tyranny of knowingness, but I do desire to show you some of the dreams and visions that I have gathered in my life journey.  I saw your post and was inspired by the strength of your beliefs and your willingness to share your thoughts with all of us.  Indeed, given that the goal of this group as clearly stated in its name, "Transforming Conservative Domination", is to alter current conservative trends, you demonstrated courage and intellectual honesty just for showing up.  These days most of us are looking for our own choirs to preach to because it truly can be difficult to subject one's views to the open glare of honest critics.  I come not to criticize however.  What criticism can one bring to another's faith and belief system anyhow?  The question at hand for all of us is not whether you or me are right or wrong; rather, how shall we best resolve conflict in a way that allows us to grow together as fellow dwellers on the planet. 

What I would like to do is to state my beliefs while reflecting some of your thoughts especially the areas where I feel we may share common ground.   Let's start out with Jesus.  I will state what I believe to be facts which hopefully will give you the foundation of my value system.  Jesus was a man.  We are men.  None of us are perfect.  In the time of Jesus, he was not perceived as perfect either.  Jesus was a Jew.  Jews were a minority living under the Roman Empire.  The Romans were the pinnacle of civilization (or believed so) at that time and their wealth and power only confirmed the blessings of their Gods.  Jesus' message was a message for all Humankind, and for all time; not only for Jew or Gentile nor any other sub-category of Humanity including the formal structure of "Christianity".  For G_d is the Nameless, the Infinite and lives in the Hearts of Humankind, not in any material or ideological structures. 

The Jews were credited with giving us Monotheism, the belief in One G_d. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheism) 

If there is a G_d, then G_d is G_d of All Creation; "Christian" and Jew, Muslim, Baha'i, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, believer and nonbeliever, etc, etc.  The Good and the Evil, all are children of G_d, Our One Creator.  The only Evil that I can be absolutely certain of is my own.  The only truly Good that I can do is to assist in bringing the awareness of our Oneness and the Brother and Sisterhood of Humankind.  This "awareness" is not dependent upon me nor any other human, for it is written in Our Hearts.  In our history books we learn the truths of our forefathers.  This is the essence of patriotism.  In other lands they learn the stories of their forefathers; they too, are patriotic.  All of these stories are mostly true, at least in our own minds. 

But there is only one Real Truth; All Living Beings are material representations of G_d, and there is only One History and that is Our Story, the Story of Humankind.  This is Our Common Spiritual Reality.  All else are sub-ordinate temporary ways of organization for a still evolving Human society. 

As we grow spiritually, our field of concern and love grows as well.  The Human Family started out in small groupings closely knit by family connections.  Over time we grew into clans, villages, cities and Nation States.  We created various ways to organize ourselves economically and socially based upon our peculiar circumstances.  We developed Legal institutions to mediate conflict and political systems to effectuate law.  Through effort, trial and error, serendipity and divine revelation we discovered many of the wonders of nature and are poised to discover some of the mysteries of the Universe.  None of this is as important however, as Our Common Destiny.   There are many paths now.  Soon there will be but two; belief in the Oneness of Our Human Family (and by implication, Our Creator) and it's opposite.

I will close in saying that the only force capable of conquering hate is Love.  The only force that can stop crime is Love.  The only force that can transform enemies into friends is Love.  The only force that can stop terrorism is Love.  Not guns, Love.  Not threats, Love.  Not politics, Love.  Not Religion, Love.  Universal Love.  This, I believe, was the message of our Lord Jesus Christ; that every Human, though stained with the blood of the centuries, can find reconciliation with one another through his life and death and His grace and our Love for One Another. 

I am not sure if you can understand my longwinded discourse, but I have tried to convey to you my honest feelings, perceptions and knowledge.  I pray I have not come across as arrogant or a "Mr. Know-it-all".  Although "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions", I do all that I do for Love.  Not for anything or anyone in particular, but for the wonder of it all and the grandeur of G_d's Creation.  If I have cut through my own biases and the limitations of Human Language, perhaps I have connected with you.  If I have been successful in connecting with you then we both share a little wisdom. 

The essence of wisdom being the awareness of shared insight.  If we now share this wisdom, what shall we do with it?  If we don't, I hope that if you find disagreement with any of my thoughts and opinions that you will show me the kindness of your views so that I may better explain myself or correct my viewpoint as appropriate.

I will send some more resources to the group re. some of the topics you touched upon --the death penalty, drug policy, US foreign policy, US economic policy, Iraqi freedom, hard work and failure, etc—in a future post.

Here are two links re. The Death Penalty:

http://www.deathofinnocents.net/

http://www.moratoriumcampaign.org/  

Your friend,

Randy (Just an ol' lump of coal)

Currently listening :
A Love Supreme
By John Coltrane
Release date: 19 August, 2003

3:55 PM - 3 Comments - 6 Kudos - Add Comment

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

The Need for Progressive Assets and Revenue Streams
Current mood: creative

If you take risks, you may fail. But if you don't take risks, you will surely fail. The greatest risk of all is to do nothing.

~Robert Goizueta

 

Be brave enough to live life creatively. The creative is the place where no one else has ever been. You have to leave the city of your comfort and go into the wilderness of your intuition. You can't get there by bus, only by hard work and risk and by not quite knowing what you're doing. What you'll discover will be wonderful. What you'll discover will be yourself.

~Alan Alda 

 

There has been a calculated risk in every stage of American development--pioneers who were not afraid of the wilderness, businessmen who were not afraid of failure, and dreamers who were not afraid of action.

~unknown

 

"Democracy is based upon the conviction that there are extraordinary possibilities in ordinary people."                                                                                       

~Harry Fosdick 

 

The rules of engagement around building a brand have changed significantly over the past 10 to 15 years. Where companies at one time could spread their message through traditional marketing, consumers now seek an enduring emotional connection with the companies they patronize. The foundation of that connection is the most important characteristic of building a world-class brand: trust. Trust with your people and trust with your customers.

~Howard Schultz 

Source: Business 2.0: How To Succeed: Dare to Be a Social Entrepreneur: http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/biz2/howtosucceed/5.html  

www.zaadz.com

 

"A social entrepreneur is someone who recognizes a social problem and uses traditional entrepreneurial principles to organize, create, and manage a venture to make social change. Whereas business entrepreneurs typically measure performance in profit and return, social entrepreneurs often start nonprofits and citizen groups."

http://groups.myspace.com/SocialEntrepreneurship 

"Why, then, do we accept the excuses? Why do we hand business a blank check and exempt enterprise from the responsibility for maintaining social values? One reason might be that . . . we have only a piecemeal view of events. We have no [way to] accumulate the overall image of cumulative destruction. Furthermore, their actions are defended--I daresay have to be defended--because most of us are dependent upon them for our livelihood. Even a declining General Motors still employs nearly 600,000 people.

A supermarket chain such as American Stores employs 200,000 or more. The 400 companies profiled in Everybody's Business Almanac employ or support one-fourth of the U.S. population. . . . The average large business is 16,500 times larger than the average small business. And since much of the population is now employed by these large corporations, they naturally see their interest as being linked to the success and growth of their employers. Such fealty resembles the allegiance that sustained feudal baronies; the vassal serfs believed that the lord who exploited them was better than the uncertainty of no lord at all. But in the competitive world of modern commerce, loyalty to the system prevents an objective examination of how market capitalism can also work against those who serve it."

"We should not be surprised then, that there is deep-seated unwillingness to face the necessary reconstruction of our commercial institutions so that they function on behalf of our lives. Business believes that if it does not continue to grow and instead cuts back and retreats, it will destroy itself. Ecologists believe that if business continues its unabated expansion it will destroy the world around it. This book will discuss a third way, a path that restores the natural communities on earth but uses many of the historically effective organizational and market techniques of free enterprise."
~Paul Hawken

http://www.ecobooks.com/books/ecommerc.htm 

"The difference between what we are doing and what we are capable of doing would solve most of the world's problems."

~Mahatma Gandhi


Message #2

Calling all artists, musicians, writers, crafters, accountants, nerds, talkers and listeners, programmers, carpenters, real estate brokers, lawyers, non-gunmen and moneymen and moneywomen, etc. let's brainstorm.  *** Anyone have any ideas or interest in working together to build ventures to further peace & social justice and create jobs and income for the participants? ***

The Need for Progressive Assets and Revenue Streams

No society, group or people can long survive if they can not provide sustenance or income to their members. Those who struggle on behalf of peace & justice can be more effective if they have independent sources of income. Groups and organizations that work on these goals are in dire need of revenue sources as well. With that in mind I sent out an email to my friend's list several days ago. Please forgive the delayed arrival of this reply to the initial group of friends answering the first email. I would list all of my excuses for not replying sooner but that would only add further delay.

I will start out by showing the replies that I have received so far and then offer my observations about the replies. I think that it would be useful if we brainstorm and generate some ideas that we can organize and winnow down based upon agreed upon criteria. Perhaps we can come up with ideas in a short, middle and long range format.

Included is info about some tax benefits of having a home-based business. Also, I have collected some info about Social Entrepreneurship, Non-Profits, and social transformation FYI.  Lots of stuff here so take your time.  As you may know Uncle Bill will endeavor to send only very useful stuff, so enjoy and pass it on.

 

Suggestion; Please join this group, http://groups.myspace.com/SocialEntrepreneurship so that we may continue this discussion online.   Also, please help get the word out if you feel this endeavor has value.  


If you recall, the question was;

*** Anyone have any ideas or interest in working together to build ventures to further peace & social justice and create jobs and income for the participants? ***


My friend Molotov said;
"I'm interested. No ideas where you want to go with this though..."
Molotov


Read on Brother Molotov, I'm not so sure myself but wherever I go, I want to go with an inclusive group of kindred spirits.

My friend Doug said;

"Sounds good to me. Let me know what you have in mind, and I'll help out any way I can! Example: I'm in Spain, and they are pretty good at alternative energy over here. It would be cool to set up a company that sends that technology to the states, since it fights against the energy and oil wars at the same time. I know a couple of people, one stateside and one here in Spain, who would also be interested. If you have any other ideas, I'd be glad to hear them!"

doug


Good stuff Doug. My wife and her sister are starting a business to broker Green goods and services. We need to discuss this further, ok?


My friend Jim said;

I'm interested. But got no ideas.....

There are places like the Catholic Worker Houses where you don't really make any money, but its room and board, anyway.

Jim

Jim, I bet you got more ideas than someone can shake a stick at.

My friend Alma said;

"I believe they can ... at least I'm hoping so. As for peace and justice ... I haven't come up with anything that would provide an income for that just yet ... our small newspaper is still barely breaking even by exploiting us volunteers.

Progressive environmentalism may have a chance down here where I am ... I've got to finish writing my business plan for a recycling project I hope to pursue ..."

Alma Abedul

Good stuff Alma. Is your newspaper online? Perhaps we can work as a group to assist you in promoting it. Also, I have a friend that does an online magazine, perhaps you can swap contact info and you publicize what they are doing and they do the same for you.
http://www.myspace.com/bansheemagazine  

My friend Dude said;

It'd have to be a non-profit enterprise. At least for now.

Dude

I don't see why we can't do both.

My friend Charles said;

One of the biggest agendas in my life is to build businesses. I created a Corporation called Siafu Industries. Basically, Siafu Ind. builds businesses. Now, of course I have only been in the foundation of building my own business, though the goals are to build business, make them self-sufficient, and then build another. I am working on a couple of projects currently. My first project is a family entertainment guide for my area, one that expands to include many areas that is free yet offers advertisement. The guide is unique in the information it contains. And second I am working on organizing a Non-Profit called SAORC or Sexual Abuse Outreach Center, Basically a national call center that assists victims in getting help, council and help with reporting the crime to the authorities, (over 70% of sexual abuse goes unreported.) So, all those are venture programs and I am very open to other ideas as well.

Your Servant

Charles

Charles,

What you are doing sounds very exciting. Would you consider having a look at my business with the possibility that I would offer my B2B service of an employee benefit nature to your employees and use some of the commissions to fund a charity of your choice and a venture that we can develop collectively with this group?


My friend Writeress said;

Hi Bill

I think first we must come together as like minds and then pursue goals of worthy change. I started the NEW TITHERS Group for that purpose, I hope. The new tithe is a method outlined in my book, of A Mustard Seed. So, the way to be compensated for your time, as every human being deserves and should insist upon, is to devise the simplest strategy one can to implement positive change to any issue. Mine is homeless kids. That is so "unnatural" to our species, or certainly should be. So, I wrote about it. I chose fiction so that hopefully, you can see the point I am making in an entertaining mystery. I love mysteries when I do actually get time to read. I prefer chewy thought every time. And, the compensation I receive will give me the resources to build houses for homeless kids. Everything comes full circle and a wonderful balance to my life and my soul is achieved. I am immensely thankful!

Writeress

Writeress;

What you are doing sounds sooo inspiring and needed. I really like what you said, "Mine is homeless kids. That is so "unnatural" to our species, or certainly should be."

My friend Carrie On said;

I've wondered about this, and i can't think of a way to make money unless you end up selling something.... darn consumer culture! I wish I could think of a way! Unless it was run by donations or membership or something. Do you have any ideas?

Carrie On

Well Carrie, I share your misgivings about consumer culture as I'm sure many of our friends do. Perhaps some aspect of the non-profit world is more to your liking. For others though, marketing or "selling" is an unfortunate part of life; Alma has a newspaper, Writeress has a book, Charles desires to start a Sexual Abuse Outreach Center and fund it using his business, all of these projects involve some aspect of consumer culture. What we should do is to build a consumer culture that is good for workers, consumers, communities and the environment.

My friend Christopher said;

(Let's create a real commune!! Plenty of fun, but serious too. This is a new concept, totally, not like the old communes at all)

A call to establish a large, rural, cooperative community (commune) based on socio-economically just principles and ecologically sustainable practices.
Please check out the proposal and instructions for joining at:
http://www.abundancethroughsharing.org/  

Thank you,

Christopher

Gainesville, Florida
rootcause@bellsouth.net
Telephone 352-275-5659

P.S. Just a personal thought, but as important as the male-female relationship is, it is only in a humanitarian communitarian socialist commune that I believe men and women will ever truly find deep and lasting peace in relationship with each other. I say this because only here would the pressures or issues of economics and companionship be removed from that relationship.

Well said Christopher. This especially caught my eye; "the pressures or issues of economics", this is a destroyer of families and communities. This is where we can have an impact.

Ok, so there you have a round-up of replies to my initial message.

As you can see, others are doing some exciting things. I have several purposes with this project all of which depend upon group effort. We are fortunate to have the internet as a resource for it offers opportunities to Social Entrepreneurs and Change Agents unheard of a generation ago.

This is one idea;  Brainstorm to create a marketing concept --a brand-- that encompasses our values, ideals and aspirations. Use that brand to create small easily outsourced items initially then more sophisticated stuff later. The idea is to use words and ideas as part of branded goods and services to further goals of peace and social justice. We know that there are millions of people that desire to do something about various problems or challenges in the world. We also know that there is a great deal of cynicism about the world of business and work. I believe that we can tap into that desire for a better world and create businesses and organizations that actually do more and more good as they grow rather than seeming increasingly threatening as many of today's large businesses are.

Structurally, I see ourselves organizing as a cooperative with each member holding equal membership. We will need to devise transparent and independent accounting procedures if we are to have long term confidence in our endeavor. The easiest thing to do would be a purely internet biz. Perhaps we can do art/slogans on www.cafepress.com or a similar service.

Our mission as I see it is to build a replicable model of a vehicle to help create meaningful social change and provide income for the participants. I am not wedded to any idea. I do not work well alone. I need people. I believe that our strength is in our numbers and our ability to build structures that facilitate our cooperation with one another and personal and community growth.

I have some ideas re. raising capital and earning income as we raise capital, but my ideas place me in a conflict of interest and I will not introduce them unless someone explicitly requests info. Beyond that, I'd love to hear from others any ideas they may have for legally, ethically and in a fun and simple way make money.

 

Below I have included info re. the tax benefits of having a business.  Irrespective of whatever else one is doing –minimum wage job, two jobs, "retired", homemaker, college student, etc. and especially if you are in a high income tax bracket and are one of the "good guys" lol—one should have a business of some kind because of the way our system has been set up to assist business ownership with tax breaks and other privileges.  Also, find info re. social entrepreneurship.

Zaragoza Bill

Tons of stuff here. My apologies.

Hire your children, write off your golf game and other legal tax deductions that you might not know about
Tax-Planning Expert Sandy Botkin
By Laura Tiffany
February 25, 2003
URL: http://www.entrepreneur.com/entrepreneurextra/fiveminuteswith/article59870.html 

Tax-Planning Expert Sandy Botkin

So you think the government is out to rob you of all your hard-earned money? Every time you hear the word "tax," you recoil in fear? Cheer up! It's not that bad--especially if you're a business owner.

Tax expert Sandy Botkin, author of Lower Your Taxes Big Time! and a former IRS attorney, says there is hope for all us saps who just hand over our paychecks to Uncle Sam. Read on for Botkin's tips on taking advantage of tons of business tax deductions--all within the letter of the law.

You say that home-based business is one of the few legal tax shelters left. What does that mean?

Sandy Botkin:
First of all, understand something: We have two tax systems in this country. [Many] times people think there's one for rich and one for poor. That is a huge myth. What the systems are is one for employees--people who don't know the rules, which are designed to take your wealth--and one for self-employed people, [the rules of] which are designed to create economic growth. The reason for that is, small business generates over 70 percent of the jobs in this country. So Congress passes good tax laws. And there are good tax laws--let me emphasize this--for small business.

Let's say your business generates a loss. If that loss exceeds the income from that business, you can use that loss against any form of income you have: interest, dividends, rents, wages, pensions, anything. Say you make $50,000 in salary and you have a small business that creates a $10,000 loss. You only pay tax on $40,000. Let's say the loss exceeds your whole income. You can carry back all business losses in 2002 five years and actually get a refund from the last five years' federal and state income tax you paid. In 2003, by the way, that number is going down to two years. Or you can carry forward all business losses 20 years and offset the next 20 years of earning. So you never lose a properly documented business deduction.

What if your home-based business is profitable? How can you still save on your taxes?

Botkin:
By having a profitable home-based business, you can set up a host of fringe benefits, many of which I include in my book. You can set up a self-insured medical reimbursement plan and write off all your deductibles, eyeglasses, co-insurance, pre-existing conditions. Usually that stuff has to exceed a certain threshold [7.5 percent of your adjusted gross income] to deduct anything. With a self-insured medical reimbursement plan, you get a deduction regardless. It's dollar for dollar.

What other deductions do people not typically know about?

Botkin:
As an employee, you have to pay [taxes on everything]. As a self-employed person, you don't pay tax until all your deductions are over. So [if you're an employee making] $60,000 a year, you've got to pay Social Security on 15.3 percent of $60,000. You've got to pay income tax on $60,000, regardless of your employee business expenses. [But] if you're self-employed--let's say you have $40,000 of expenses on that $60,000, you only pay tax on $20,000. You pay tax on your net. See the difference?

So what are some things you can do? If you have a child and you want to send them to college, that isn't deductible. And if you pay for their wedding, is that deductible? The answer is no. But if you were to hire your children in your business and pay them [the same] wage you'd pay an assistant, that's deductible. And if they use that money to pay for their own college or their own wedding or their own car, aren't you in essence getting a deduction for those things?

And by the way, children under 18--if you hire them in a sole proprietorship business--are exempt from Social Security and federal unemployment taxes, and the first $4,700 they made in 2002 is exempt from income tax. Result? You get a deduction, and they get that money tax-free.

So to protect yourself, you need to do the same paperwork as you would a normal employee?


Botkin:
Good point. You want to have things like time sheets or a tax diary showing what your kid did. So for example, you might say Matthew, my son, sorted files and made 3-by-5 cards for four hours on February 3. That shows what he did, when he did it and how long he worked.

You also want to pay by check--none of this under-the-table nonsense, because [checks] establish a payment from you to your child to your child's bank account. You want to have the appropriate paperwork done. There are W-2s you have to file once a year and 940s and 941s for unemployment and Social Security. But I recommend using a payroll service, because people don't want to do all this paperwork. They will do all the payroll, all the forms, all the filings. You also want to have a contract for services showing you hired your kids and what you're paying them, a normal contract like any other employee.

Does all this apply when you hire your spouse as well?


Botkin:
Yes, it's all the same. Now for hiring your spouse, you can set up a self-insured medical reimbursement plan. I can deduct all my medical expenses, dollar for dollar--not because I'm paying medical, but because I'm providing a medical reimbursement plan for my employee, who I happen to be married to. And the IRS has approved this, by the way. It's not some loophole I thought up.

What are some other techniques for taking deductions?


Botkin:
A lot of people don't know that when you're in business, you can deduct your fun. IRS says in their regulations that you can deduct 50 percent of your fun and 50 percent of your [business associate's] fun if you talk business within the same 24-hour day as the fun. Say you invite a prospect over to go to a football game. You talk business over the phone and then pick them up two hours later. Is that talking business within the same 24-hour day? The answer is yes. Say we go to a restaurant and I talk to you in the car about our business or try to get referrals and then we go to a nice theater. Is that talking business within the same 24-hour day? The answer is yes.

You also don't need receipts for entertainment if it's under $75 per expense. Now when you do entertain, the IRS requires certain documentation. So with entertainment, you have to write down what I call the four Ws and an H:

Who: name and occupation
Where: We went to Greasy Lloyd's restaurant.
Why: Why did you take that person out?
And here's one of the biggest mistakes self-employed people make. You must be specific in the documentation. The word "prospect" isn't specific enough. "Good will" isn't specific enough. Specific would be "try to get a referral" or "talked with a reporter about my book." Don't be general.
What: What was the date, and was it for breakfast, lunch or dinner?
• And finally, how much.

If you write down all five things, you'll never have to worry about an IRS audit again. If you leave out any one of the five, your deductions will be disallowed and the IRS will hit you with a 75 percent penalty, plus interest.

Why is it so important to make yourself aware of these things?

Botkin: What amazes me is, say you look at your credit card statement and there's a $200 charge you never saw before. Aren't you going to call the credit card company and find out what's going on? And you might spend an hour on the phone doing that. Yet taxes are the number-one expense in this country. They exceed what most people pay for food, clothing, lodging and transportation combined. [But] 99 [percent of people] give it a 10-minute thought. And the reason is, there's a huge myth in this country. "My accountant takes care of my taxes."

What are some audit red flags that people need to avoid?

Botkin: The number-one red flag is failing to report all your income. The IRS matches all those 1099s you get from your bank accounts, your stock brokerage companies, whatever. If there's a mismatch--suppose you made $30,000, but you only report $28,000--then you're calling attention to your tax return.

The second thing you want to do is do not use cents in figuring out your tax return. Always round. Mathematical errors cause some of the biggest scrutiny of your tax return because things don't match up. If you use cents, you're just increasing your chance of making an error.

If you do your own tax return, for the most part, you increase your chance of being selected for an audit. The IRS figures if you do your own return, you don't know what you're doing, unlike accountants who might do hundreds of returns. People tend to make more mathematical mistakes when they do their own returns than accountants make.

Third major tip to reducing your chance of audit: Always, always send in your tax return with a return receipt. And if there's a check, send it registered mail or FedEx. There [have even been] cases where if you do send it FedEx [and it is lost], the IRS will waive penalties.

I'll give you another nice tip. Many times people call the IRS for information, especially during this time of year. The problem is, the IRS isn't bound to anything they tell you. However, there is one situation where you can call IRS and if you get a bad answer, they'll waive penalties. But you've got to get six things when you call them: The person's name, their badge number, the date of the call, the time of the call, the nature of the question and the answer. If you write down all six things and you get a bad answer that IRS relied on, they'll waive penalties...

If You Dont Have a Home-Based Business Start One Today! - 4/17/2001
Sandy Botkin CPA. Esq.
Copyright 2001, all rights reserved

The last decade may have been a decade of tremendous corporate profits and economic growth, but for the vast majority of North Americans, the 90's were a dismal, uphill climb. And many economists believe that this new millennium won't be getting better any time soon.

Why?


Changing business and government attitudes are the reason. There has seemingly been more anti-business legislation in the last decade than in any other this century. Stronger employment and labor laws, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Comprehensive Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA, which includes mandating health insurance for workers for a period of time after they leave employment), safety laws, much tougher laws for discharging workers, more liabilities for lawsuits, Family Leave Act, Americans with Disabilities Act (which is creating immense numbers of lawsuits), along with higher minimum wages and fringe benefits.

Just reading this list is exhausting.

While these acts have beneficial and protective aspects, they have also encouraged businesses to move their facilities. That "sucking sound" popularized by Ross Perot is not just down to Mexico, but elsewhere as well. The result has been a dramatic loss of heavy industry in the U.S.

The young and the middle-aged alike are realizing that their dream of "having a job with a company forever" is an illusion. Companies have been downsizing, rightsizing, and capsizing for some time now, and they continue to do so-more now than ever before. Even the federal and state governments are getting into the act with layoffs and attrition of jobs.

In addition to all this uncertainty and mutual lack of loyalty between companies and employees, even the workers who do keep their jobs have no guarantee of promotions due to the shrinking number of management positions. These circumstances aggravate the already tryingly long commutes in rush hour traffic and increasingly typical frustrated boss-spelled backwards, that double S-O-B.

Finally, if all this isn't bad enough, under recent tax laws employees are shafted more than ever with limits and thresholds for their employee deductions and higher social security tax limits. This results in more couples working than ever before and, on many occasions, working more than one job. It is now almost impossible to have only one job in the family and make ends meet! Today, many households need three incomes just to survive.

Sadly, even having more than one job does not produce any major positive effect on most people's bank accounts. Why? Because of tax laws. This was well illustrated in 1994 by Jane Bryant Quinn in her Woman's Day article on "How to Live on One Salary."

Where The Money Goes

Ms. Quinn's example assumed that a man was earning $40,000 per year. His wife (we will call her Lori) wasn't working. They had more month than money. (Sound familiar?) Lori subsequently got an administrative job for $15,000 per year. You would think this would improve the family's financial situation, but when Ms. Quinn examined the economics of getting this extra income, the results were startling!

Lori had to pay federal and state taxes on her new income. Since they filed jointly, the family's combined income was what established their tax bracket. She paid $4,500 in new taxes, most of which was non-deductible, for federal and state income tax.

Lori had social security withheld from her paycheck at the rate of 7.65 percent, which amounted to an additional nondeductible amount of $1,148 being extracted from her salary. She also had to commute to work 10 miles a day round trip, which is probably conservative for most people. This resulted (in 1995) in nondeductible commuting costs of $696.

Lori also had some child care expenses, which give a partial tax credit. Ms. Quinn figured that the amount spent over and beyond the tax credit was $4,250 per year.

Lori also ate out each day with colleagues, spending an average of $5 per day, five days a week. This results in a nondeductible expense of $1,250 per year. ( I would love to know where she ate for only $5!)

Now that Lori has a job, she has to have professional clothing, this means a hefty dry cleaning bill. Ms. Quinn assumed that Lori's increased expenses here amounted to an extra $1,000 per year, nondeductible, of course.

Finally, with both spouses working, Lori wasn't in the mood to cook dinner every night. They bought more convenience foods and ate out more frequently. This resulted in increased food costs of a nondeductible $1,000 per year in minimum.

Add it all up and Lori's take home pay was a paltry $1,156 a year, for which she had to put up with a daily commute, an unpleasant boss, and corporate hassles.

No wonder more and more people are starting home-based businesses. In fact, there are currently an estimated 30 million people working from their homes. This number is expected to more than triple, to 97 million, by the year 2000, and to keep on growing. This has become and will continue to be one of the greatest mass movements in the U.S.

Why a Home-Based Business Makes So Much "Cents"

There are many reasons why so many people are favoring home-based over traditional business.

There is no commute (unless you have a really big home), no boss, little if any chance of lawsuits, much lower overhead, no employees, (or few), and far fewer government restrictions. In fact, many of the laws previously cited don't apply to small firms with few or no employees. It is for these reasons, according to Entrepreneur magazine, that 95 percent of home-based businesses succeed in their first year and achieve an average income of $50,250 per year with many earning much more.

There are really two sets of tax laws in this country. One is for employees, and it allows deductions for individual retirement accounts, 401(k)s (if you have one set up by your company), interest and property taxes on your home (which some in Congress want to do away with ), and charity. Then there are the laws for home-based business people who conduct their business either full-time or part-time. They can deduct, with proper documentation ,their house, their spouse, and even children (by hiring them), their business vacations, their cars, and their food with colleagues. They can also set up a pension plan that makes any government plan seem paltry by comparison.

For Lori-and for you - the meaning of all this is simple:

Lori earned $15,000 in salary as an employee, but took home only $1,156. She could have netted the entire $15,000 had she earned it in a home-based business!

This is an increase of almost 13 times her take-home pay as an employee.

Notice that Lori is not spending dramatically more money than she is currently spending. She would eat out anyway, go on trips and drive her car the same as before. By having a home-based business, however, many of their expenses become deductible. This concept is known as "redirecting expenses." With a legitimate home-based business, she can now deduct some of the expenses that she is incurring anyway.

Renegade Strategy: If you don't have a home-based business, start one!

In addition to all the benefits mentioned above, Congress will subsidize you while you are growing your home-based business. If your home-based business produces a tax loss in the first year or so, you can use that tax loss against any other income you have. It can be used against wages earned as an employee, dividends, pensions, or interest income-or you can use the loss against your spouse's earnings if you file a joint return.

If the tax loss exceeds all your income for this year, no problem. You can carry back the loss two years and get a refund from the IRS for up to the last two years of income taxes paid, or you can carry over the loss twenty years. You read it right: You can offset up to 20 years of income!

Here's an example:

Mike earns $50,000 in a job with the government. If he starts a home-based business that generates a tax loss of 10,000, he only pays tax on $40,000.

Renegade Tip: You can never lose a properly documented business deduction as long as you run your legitimate business like a business with a bona fide business purpose and have an honest expectation of profit. Make also sure that all your expenses are ordinary and necessary and reasonable as noted in our Tax Advantage and Tax Strategy Program

Renegade Strategy: Get LUCK-Labor Under Correct Knowledge.

Can You Succeed In a Home-Based Business?

Research has constantly shown that it is rarely the business that determines success or failure. It is usually the business owner. Why does one person succeed and another fail at the same business?

Two words-Knowledge and Action.

Some people want the benefits of having their own business, but they don't take action. The result is business failure.

Then there are the people who are always working. They take action but still fail. The reason is that they are not taking the correct actions, the knowledgeable actions, that will bring the desired results. Again, business failure.

It's like drilling for oil. If you set up a drilling rig in your back yard, it is going to fail at producing oil unless your back yard is in Texas or Alaska. The same rig in a good field will produce a gusher, because it was placed where oil was known to exist.

The point is that most people who get excited about starting their own home-based business do so without all the necessary knowledge. Consequently, many people quit before they acquire, through experience, the knowledge they need, without realizing that they are getting substantial tax breaks. This leads to another strategy....


Renegade Strategy: Learn to duplicate the success of others.

Duplicating the strategy of others is much quicker and more effective than going to the school of hard knocks.

It is also known as modeling, which is well-illustrated by the way The McDonalds Corporation blazed a trail to success that many have since followed.

In the early 1950's McDonald's and other start-up companies discovered that they could grow many times faster than the conventional firms through franchising. Instead of the company investing millions of dollars to build new stores, they let independent franchises do it for them.

It seemed like a great idea, but at first no one figured out how to make it succeed on a consistent basis; therefore, the media attacked relentlessly and continually. News articles featured destitute families who had lost their life savings through franchising schemes. Virtually every state attorney general in the U.S. condemned the new marketing method. Some congressmen even tried to outlaw franchising entirely.

Over the years, however, Ray Kroc and his management team at McDonald's developed a turnkey franchise business team at McDonald's franchise. The newfound success-from the system-turned public perception of franchising around. Today, virtually every franchise business models-to some extent-the franchise business system created by McDonald's, making franchising one of the most respected ways of doing business in the world.

Modeling is simply learning what other successful people have done to achieve success in a specific area, and then doing the same thing. Someone said that "education is the shortcut to experience." With modeling, you literally leverage your own learning with the collective years of learning through experience of many others. Modeling the success of others saves both time and money and reduces frustration and stress.

The light at the end of the tunnel, for you and millions of others today, is the financial opportunity that starting your own business offers. If you have one going already, then make sure you are enjoying the many financial advantages to which your smart choice entitles you. The tax advantage alone can make a home-based business the single best financial move you could ever make.

Sandy Botkin is a CPA, attorney and former trainer of IRS attorneys nationwide. He lectures all over the nation on tax planning for self-employed and corporate taxpayers and can be seen in the big events with Donald Trump, Anthony Robbins and many others. He has been written up in Newsweek and in many other magazines. He is also a syndicated writer and noted author of this famed tape series "Tax Strategies for Business Professionals" and "Tax and Financial Strategies for Residential Real Estate." To find out more about Sandy and his products, check out his terrific small business web site at: www.taxreductioninstitute.com or by calling his office at 301-972-3600 in Maryland. http://www.taxreductioninstitute.com/article.asp?specific=10 

What is a Social Entrepreneur(SE)? 


Social entrepreneurs are individuals with innovative solutions to society's most pressing social problems. They are ambitious and persistent, tackling major social issues and offering new ideas for wide-scale change.


Rather than leaving societal needs to the government or business sectors, social entrepreneurs find what is not working and solve the problem by changing the system, spreading the solution, and persuading entire societies to take new leaps.
http://www.ashoka.org/fellows/social_entrepreneur.cfm 

Social entrepreneurship

Social entrepreneurship is the work of a social entrepreneur. A social entrepreneur is someone who recognizes a social problem and uses entrepreneurial principles to organize, create, and manage a venture to make social change. Whereas business entrepreneurs typically measure performance in profit and return, social entrepreneurs assess their success in terms of the impact they have on society and often work through nonprofits and citizen groups.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_entrepreneurship 

What is a Social Entrepreneur?

A social entrepreneur is a different kind of social leader who:

Identifies and applies practical solutions to social problems by combining innovation, resourcefulness and opportunity.

Innovates by finding a new product, a new service, or a new approach to a social problem

Focuses first and foremost on social value creation and in that spirit, is willing to share openly the innovations and insights of the initiative with a view to its wider replication

Doesn't wait to secure the resources before undertaking the catalytic innovation

Is fully accountable to the constituencies s/he serves

Resists being trapped by the constraints of ideology or discipline

Continuously refines and adapts approach in response to feedback

Has a vision, but also a well-thought out roadmap as to how to attain the goal


What is Social Entrepreneurship?

Describes an approach to a social issue.  It is not a field of discipline that can be learned in academia.

An approach that cuts across disciplines (medicine, engineering, law, education, investment banking, agronomy, environment, etc.) and is not confined to sectors (health, transportation, finance, labor, trade, and the like).

More related to leadership than to management
http://www.schwabfound.org/definition.htm


Social Enterprise (Social Entrepreneurship)
http://www.managementhelp.org/soc_entr/soc_entr.htm 


Nonprofits Doing Business:

Earned-Income Generation
The National Economic Development and Law Center offers a free document [PDF] regarding many of the legal ramifications of creating a business venture out of a nonprofit.

Even though an organization is tax exempt, it still may be liable for tax on its unrelated business income. Unrelated business income is income from a trade or business, regularly carried on, that is not substantially related to the performance by the organization of its exempt purpose or function except that the organization needs the profits derived from this activity. An exempt organization that has $1,000 or more gross income from an unrelated business must file Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return. For additional information, see the Form 990-T instructions. http://www.nonprofitexpert.com/income.htm


Where to Start:
http://www.socialenterprise.net/pdfs/earned_income_strategies.pdf 

Why Grantmakers Fund SE's
http://www.se-alliance.org/making_the_case_final.pdf 

Important definitions
After years of hovering around the edges of the nonprofit sector, social entrepreneurship today has moved into the mainstream. Venture philanthropists, traditional grant-makers, Boards of Directors, nonprofit entrepreneurs, consultants, academics and others are all rushing to the table. But there is still confusion about terminology.

Please click here for definitions of 22 terms that might prove useful. http://www.socialent.org/beta/definitions.htm  

And here are three of the most important:

"Dependency"
The traditional business model for nonprofits, in which they depend solely or almost entirely on charitable contributions and public sector subsidies, with earned income either non-existent or minimal

"Sustainability"
The ability to fund the future of a nonprofit through a combination of earned income, charitable contributions and public sector subsidies

"Self-sufficiency"
The ability to fund the future of a nonprofit through earned income alone
http://www.socialent.org/ 

Eight Basic Principles for Non-Profit SE's


"Eight basic principles for nonprofit entrepreneurs," Jerr Boschee, Nonprofit World, July-August 2001, pp. 15-18.
http://www.socialent.org/pdfs/8BasicPrinciples.pdf 

The Social Enterprise Sourcebook

Jerr Boschee's Sourcebook contains journalistic profiles of 14 nonprofits that have successfully started social sector businesses. If you would like to download free copies of specific chapters, click below on the name of the nonprofit featured in the chapter you desire.

http://www.socialent.org/sourcebook.htm 

Welcome to the Social Edge Resource Index.

Social Edge's online events cover topics crucial to the success and growth of nonprofit organizations across the globe. Social Edge also hosts a library of articles written by experts in the field. These archived events and articles contain a trove of practical advice and recommendations for practitioners in the field of social entrepreneurship.

To find the information you need, simply search the category and topic you're looking for. Events are grouped by topic and listed alphabetically.
http://www.socialedge.org/resources.html 

Vision
The vision of Social Edge is to become a spiritual home for social entrepreneurs, supporting the growth of social entrepreneurship as a field.


Mission
The mission of Social Edge to inform social entrepreneurs about news and opportunities, educate them with a set of information resources in the field and connect them to each other and the broader community with tools and services that support their work.

Engaging Youth To Be Social Entrepreneurs
A Network Of Purpose
Should Your Organization Go Hybrid
Networking For The Social Benefit Sector
Creating A Hybrid For-Profit / Nonprofit Social Enterprise Structure
How To Get Online Donations
Profit For A Purpose
What's Your Story? What's Your Need?
Help Us Find An Alternative To 'Nonprofit.'
Second Life and the Social Sector
http://www.socialedge.org/ 

Entrepreneuring Peace
On-the-ground innovations for managing conflict
Entry deadline is January 10, 2007 at 12 pm Eastern US time
http://www.changemakers.net/journal/peace/ 


A social entrepreneur is someone who recognizes a social problem and uses traditional entrepreneurial principles to organize, create, and manage a venture to make social change. Whereas business entrepreneurs typically measure performance in profit and return, social entrepreneurs often start nonprofits and citizen groups.

http://groups.myspace.com/SocialEntrepreneurship 

If you do not design the future, someone or something else will design it for you.
~Edward de Bono                                    

http://www.zaadz.com/

Currently reading :
How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas
By David Bornstein
Release date: 05 February, 2004

11:28 AM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Undercover of the Night the Devil's Work Gets Done
Current mood: working

An Anti-Democracy Foreign Policy: Guatemala
by Jacob G. Hornberger, February 11, 2005

 

Unfortunately, the CIA "success" in Iran, which produced the CIA's ouster of Iran's democratically elected prime minister, bred a CIA "success" in another part of the world, Latin America. One year after the 1953 coup in Iran, the CIA did it again, this time in Guatemala, where U.S. officials feared the communist threat even more than they did in Iran.

 

This time, the target was the democratically elected president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz, a self-avowed socialist whose domestic policies were in fact modeled after the socialist New Deal policies of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt.

 

Arbenz's socialist mindset had driven him to adopt an "agrarian reform plan," a type of land-distribution scheme that unfortunately is all too common in Latin America. The plan entailed the confiscation of a portion of land owned by a major U.S. corporation operating in Guatemala at that time, United Fruit, and its redistribution to Guatemalan peasants. While the plan was an almost perfect embodiment of the socialist concept of taking property from the rich to give to the poor, in actuality it was no different in principle from the wealth-redistribution revolution that FDR's welfare-state concept brought to America, whereby the primary purpose of the federal government became taxing the income of the rich in order to redistribute the money to the needy (or, in reality, to the politically privileged).

 

So Arbenz had two strikes against him already as far as the CIA was concerned — his belief in socialism and his confrontation with a major U.S. corporation that had strong allies in the U.S. Congress. His third strike knocked him out — his unwillingness to obey U.S. government orders to rid his government of self-avowed communists.

 

Consequently, flush with the "success" of its coup in Iran the year before, in 1954 the CIA secretly organized and engineered a military coup in Guatemala that ousted the democratically elected Arbenz from power. Schlesinger and Kinzer write:

The United States organized, financed, and equipped the invasion forces. U.S. personnel flew the rebel aircraft and filled the airways with bogus transmissions suggesting a much larger force had invaded. Unrelenting U.S. diplomatic and political pressure encouraged treason and demoralized supporters. CIA assets in the officer corps and the administration worked actively to undermine President Arbenz's authority and block efforts to move against the rebels.

 

Unaware that the CIA was orchestrating the military coup against him, throughout the crisis Arbenz turned to the U.S. government for help, innocently placing his faith in a government that was purportedly committed to advancing democracy. On Sunday, June 27, 1954, democratically elected President Jacobo Arbenz was ousted from office and fled Guatemala. The CIA replaced him with an unelected Guatemalan military dictator, Col. Carlos Castillo Armas, whom the CIA designated the "Liberator" of the Guatemalan people.

 

Canceling the presidential election scheduled for 1955 and continuing "emergency" suspension of civil liberties, including freedom of the press, Castillo Armas retained the unwavering support of the U.S. government. A year after taking office, he visited Washington, where he was warmly greeted by Vice President Richard Nixon and, not surprisingly given that he was a military man, was accorded the privilege of reviewing a U.S. military honor guard with Nixon at his side. Nixon visted Guatemala in 1955, declaring that "this is the first instance in history were a Communist government has been replaced by a free one."

 

The CIA's new "free" regime lasted for three years. Plagued by corruption, chaos, dissent, and violence, the Castillo Armas regime came to a violent end in 1957, when the CIA's "Liberator" was assassinated by one of his guards, who supposedly committed suicide immediately after killing the president.

Castillo Armas was then followed by a succession of U.S.-approved Guatemalan military regimes, regimes whose military men, over the years, would be trained in torture, assassination, and counter-insurgency techniques at the Pentagon's infamous School of the Americas. The CIA-induced Guatemalan coup and the four decades of brutal, torturous, U.S.-government-supported military rule that came with it precipitated a civil war in Guatemala that would last some 40 years and ultimately take the lives of more than 200,000 Guatemalan people.

 

In their book Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala, Stephen Schlesinger and Stephen Kinzer write,

The [Historical Clarification Commission], which was headed by a German lawyer, Christian Tomuschat, estimated that the conflict had caused more than 200,000 deaths, and blamed the military for 93 percent of them. In a speech presenting the report, Mr. Tomuschat said that while he and his fellow commissioners knew when they began their work more or less what had happened during the conflict, "no one of us could have imagined the dimensions of this tragedy, not even the Guatemalan commissioners who had lived through the experience directly."

 

"It is with profound sadness that the commission learned of the extreme cruelty with which many of the violations were committed, of the large number of girls and boys who were victims of violent cruelty and murder, and of the special brutality directed against women, especially against Mayan women, who were tortured, raped and murdered," Mr. Tomuschat said. "State security forces blindly pursued the anti-Communist struggle without respect for any legal principles or the most elemental ethical and religious values."

 

In 1999, President Clinton, visiting Guatemala, candidly admitted, "For the United States, it is important that I state clearly that support for military forces and intelligence units which engaged in violence and widespread repression was wrong, and the United States must not repeat that mistake."

 

What if the CIA had not intervened in the domestic affairs of Guatemala? What if it hadn't violently ousted its democratically elected president? What if it had not installed a series of brutal U.S.-approved military dictatorships in Guatemala? What if it had simply stayed out of the natural democratic progression in Guatemala, letting regularly scheduled national elections to take place in 1955, one year after the coup? Schlesinger and Kinzer write, Had Arbenz served out his term, the opposition might well have been strong enough to contest and even win the 1955 elections. Although a distinct minority, the conservative opposition had both money and organized religion on its side.... In short, the democratic option — however uncertain its results — was still open to Guatemalan conservatives in 1954. The U.S. intervention gave them an opportunity to win by opting instead for the security of authoritarian repression. In taking this path, they condemned their country to four decades of unremitting brutality and violence.

 

The CIA's easy "success" in Iran and Guatemala then drove it to seek regime change in Cuba, where President Fidel Castro's steadfast refusal to do the bidding of U.S. officials led not only to the Bay of Pigs disaster but also to the U.S. government's 45-year obsession with ousting Castro from power. (While Castro is an unelected communist dictator, it has never been a lack of democracy in Cuba that has driven the U.S. government's obsession with ousting him from power.

 

Instead, the obsession is rooted in Castro's longtime, steadfast commitment to keeping Cuba independent of U.S. government control, unlike other Latin American regimes, both elected and unelected, which consider it an enormous honor and privilege to be well-paid vassals in the U.S. government's vast overseas empire.)

 

Then, in 1973, faced with the democratic election of another self-avowed socialist in Latin America, Salvador Allende, the CIA supported his violent military ouster and the installation of a military strongman into power, Gen. Augusto Pinochet. I wrote about Pinochet's U.S.-supported 17-year reign of murder, torture, and terror in my recent article "U.S. Regime Change, Torture, and Murder in Chile.<